-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Rumpf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 November 2004 17:20
To: LOGS (Tunc Eresen); users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: How can I bring CPU down where Spamd takes %60 of all CPU?
On Thursday 18 November 2004 04:20 am, LOGS (Tunc Eresen) wrote:
First, shutdown the running spamd process (if it is), and any process that
calls the use of spamassassin.
Then from the CPAN shell use 'force install Mail::SpamAssassin'
Then restart everything and see what happens.
-Noel
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Suurmeijer [mailto:[EMAIL
At 06:57 PM 11/18/2004, Rick Macdougall wrote:
Pssh, kill -15 is for wimps :)
Yeah, true.. real sysadmins just fix their servers by throwing the main
circuit breaker in the breaker panel :)
(and of course, REAL sysamdins don't use UPS systems either. After all,
what user is going to be at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2004 3:38 PM, Michael Parker wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:53:19AM -0800, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
Some questions:
Is bytea really necessary? If I follow the path of the patch, the bytea
change was done prior to adding the index.
[ Lots of Good Stuff ]
Yes please, can you dump all of this into the bug so we have a good
record.
Thanks,
Michael
pgpy9B04ISWOI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I've run into a problem with sa-learn. I'm running SA 3.0.1, and since the
RPMs always seem to lag behind the binaries it's compiled. I call
spamassassin using amavsd. I think the problem has arisen since upgrading my
Mandrake system from 10.0 to 10.1, it looks like 10.1 uses Perl 5.8.5, I
Bob Mortimer wrote:
I've run into a problem with sa-learn. I'm running SA 3.0.1, and since the
RPMs always seem to lag behind the binaries it's compiled. I call
spamassassin using amavsd. I think the problem has arisen since upgrading my
Mandrake system from 10.0 to 10.1, it looks like 10.1
tried it but didn't work. There's probably some statement in a startup
script that is no longer available in v3.01, but I have no idea
what. Anyone?
Noel K Hall II wrote:
First, shutdown the running spamd process (if it is), and any process that
calls the use of spamassassin.
Then from the
Hello everyone
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 and for some reason, rewrite_subject is not
working. It's set on 1 in my local.cf (I'm starting it with spamd).
Any clues?
Thanks
Lior Marantenboim
SysAdmin
bumeran.com
Lior Marantenboim wrote:
Hello everyone
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 and for some reason, rewrite_subject is not
working. It's set on 1 in my local.cf (I'm starting it with spamd).
Any clues?
Hi,
Read the upgrade doc. rewrite_subject doesn't exist anymore.
From the UPGRADE file
- The
On Friday 19 Nov 2004 08:29, alan premselaar wrote:
what is the actual sa-learn command you're using? I ran into this
using Maildir format by specifying sa-learn -D --spam
/path/to/maildir/cur/*
I use one script to move the mails out of my mail directory tree into my
ham/spam folders:
Thanks everyone, it was my fault for not reading !
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 11:26, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:28 AM 11/19/2004 -0300, Lior Marantenboim wrote:
Hello everyone
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.0 and for some reason, rewrite_subject is not
working. It's set on 1 in my local.cf (I'm
hi ive fed sa-learn about 450 each of spam ham
bash-2.03$ sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0426 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0427 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:48:07PM +1100, Dimitry Peisakhov wrote:
Thanks for the advice Michael. I have a question though.
Services from init.d start up under root, as far as i know. Root
currently has no TZ set, but all other services log correctly. If i
set TZ in the spamd init.d
|-Original Message-
|From: Stefan Suurmeijer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 18 November 2004 23:52
|To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
|Subject: script error?
|
|Hi list,
|
|this is probably some easy configuration issue, but it's now
|almost 1am and I just spent the last 4 hours
Hello Matt,
Thank you for ur answer,
Matt Kettler dijo:
At 04:13 PM 11/18/2004, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
I'm seeing a heavy cpu usage in some process of spamd for a long time and
sometimes they just hang there until I kill them(usage goes from 80% to
97%).
Also my system is reporting a high
Platform: Solaris 8
MTA: Postfix 2.1.5
Software: SpamAssassin 2.64
SQL: MySQL 4.0.21
I have fixed the issue with spamd querying MySQL with the -u option.
Thanks. Now I have another problem. It seems that incoming spam is tagged
properly in the headers, but the subject is not being edited. Here
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 07:24:33AM +, Bob Mortimer wrote:
I've run into a problem with sa-learn. I'm running SA 3.0.1, and since
the RPMs always seem to lag behind the binaries it's compiled. I
call spamassassin using amavsd. I think the problem has arisen since
upgrading my Mandrake
On fredag 19 november 2004, 18:45, Jim Maul wrote:
I can not believe the number of times this question is asked on the
list
:( I guess it shows how many people dont read the documentation and
dont search the archives.
Yeah... I just tried to add this as an entry to the main FAQ Wiki page,
For clarification then, I'm not running SA 3.0.0 (as you can see on the
third line of my original e-mail), so does this apply to older versions of
SA? From what I gather it doesn't.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:46 PM
To:
spamd running as uid 'spamd', qmail-smtpd calling qmail-scanner,
qmail-scanner calling spamd. (same problem if run as root).
sa 3.0.1.
freebsd 5.3-release, qmail 1.03, qmail-scanner 1.24.
synopsis:
if i pass the GTUBE message to SA via spamc, my localprefs are read and
the message is treated as
On Friday 19 Nov 2004 17:40, Michael Barnes wrote:
when I try to sa-learn my ham/spam I get the following:
/usr/bin/sa-learn: /usr/bin/perl5.8.3: bad interpreter: No such file
or directory
I've always thought that No such file or directory was one of the
clearest messages from a
On Friday 19 Nov 2004 17:40, you wrote:
when I try to sa-learn my ham/spam I get the following:
/usr/bin/sa-learn: /usr/bin/perl5.8.3: bad interpreter: No such file
or directory
I've always thought that No such file or directory was one of the
clearest messages from a computer, but
I am trying to get to www.exit0.us to download Rules_du_jour for a new SA
install but am unable to get to that web site. Is there a new place to get
that new script?
-Scott
Hello,
I'm running a Slack 10 system with mostly self-compiled software. Using
SA version 3.0.1. Athlon 2600 w/ 512meg + 120gb SATA harddrive.
Here is my problem. I downloaded and compiled a new version of perl.
running spamassassin against the sample-spam.txt and sample-nospam.txt
files yields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
check the settings for MULTIPLICITY, use of a perl shared lib, and the
various threading options. turning those on will slow things down quite a
lot.
- --j.
Bryan Koschmann - GKT writes:
Hello,
I'm running a Slack 10 system with mostly
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:30:41AM -0800, Bryan Koschmann - GKT wrote:
Both were perl 5.8.4. I cannot seem to track down what is causing this.
All the perl modules are the same as well. Is there some specific option
that perl needs to be compiled with to make this run properly?
Possibly
Hello,
I just ran SA 2.64 on my Debian Testing (all installed via apt-get) on a
x86.
I got these error messages i dont know to interpret.
Would you help me to correctly set my system up ?
The way I run SA: Debian init script
OPTIONS=-m 10 -a -H
(-d is automatically added by the startup script)
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Bob Mortimer spake:
On Friday 19 Nov 2004 17:40, you wrote:
when I try to sa-learn my ham/spam I get the following:
/usr/bin/sa-learn: /usr/bin/perl5.8.3: bad interpreter: No such file
or directory
I've always thought that No such file or directory was one of the
On Friday 19 Nov 2004 22:08, Nix wrote:
Yes, I know what it means, but see below (I'm not sure exactly where the
request for /usr/bin/perl5.8.3 is coming form or how I fix it) ...
It's on the first line of the sa-learn script (which names the
interpreter, i.e., perl, to use to interpret
I am looking at getting messages together to train spamassassin and told
users to forward me messages that are spam that still get through. Is
this an ok method of collecting or will the fact that so many are
forwarded messages throw off the training?
I have thought about setting up a specific
31 matches
Mail list logo
