Whoops, forgot to cc the list. Sorry for the dupe, Per.
On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 09:54:32 +0100, Per Jessen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Ron Johnson wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Show of hands,
who's still on 2.64 with no exact plans to upgrade?
Alright, so far I've seen 4-5, maybe 6 people
Hi,
We are getting a lot of spam messages coming through with low scores.
Anyone have any special rule sets that would be interested in sharing? I
use the rules de jour to update my rules but it doesn't seem to capture all
the spam.
Also, Is there like a public shared Bayesian database that
Anyone have any examples of how to read the X-Spam-Level:
and delete messages if the score is over 15?
Thank you
Hi All,
Just setting up SA 3.0.2 on a test server (to work towards upgrading our
main server that runs 2.64) and have discovered a change that might seem
innocent to the designers, but which is a PITA for us.
According to UPGRADE:
- The rewrite_subject and subject_tag configuration options were
Rainer Sokoll wrote:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:58:23AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Disclaimer: I've never used the plugin, but I can casually read the code...
Lucky you ;-)
wrongmx needs to run on your primary, and will detect that mail first went
through one of your secondaries before hitting
Simon Byrnand wrote:
Hi All,
Just setting up SA 3.0.2 on a test server (to work towards upgrading our
main server that runs 2.64) and have discovered a change that might seem
innocent to the designers, but which is a PITA for us.
According to UPGRADE:
- The rewrite_subject and subject_tag
At 07:27 PM 1/6/2005, Simon Byrnand wrote:
- The rewrite_subject and subject_tag configuration options were
deprecated and are now removed. Instead, using rewrite_header Subject
[your desired setting]. e.g.
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag SPAM(_SCORE_)
becomes
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:23:50 -0800
Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any examples of how to read the X-Spam-Level:
and delete messages if the score is over 15?
Thank you
It depends a great deal on what software you're using. I use
sendmail and procmail. In
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:48:33 -0800
Raquel Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:23:50 -0800
Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone have any examples of how to read the X-Spam-Level:
and delete messages if the score is over
15?
Thank you
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
The mail system it was designed for has four primary MXes (all
preference 0) multihomed with connections from three different networks.
A secondary MX was added mainly to attract spam. [...]
BTW, related: a good way
Thanks Aaron,
I changed the /dev/console to /var/log/messages, but it didn't help. I
was wrong, it was amavisd-new that was writing the messages. I made sure
that amavis was set to write to the syslog, but that didn't help either. I
am pretty puzzled. I usually ssh into the box, but I
I made sure
that amavis was set to write to the syslog, but that didn't help either.
I
am pretty puzzled. I usually ssh into the box, but I can go to the
console
and choose another screen.
Did you restart amvis after making the logging change?
Loren
Basically SURBL's are shared DB's of spam identifying information. I put
them on my 2.6x install with the SpamCop plugin and I don't have to worry
about spam anymore. I can't say it's 100% but I would guess about 98%
effective from the people I have talked to. This is on a mailserver with
about
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
who's still on 2.64 with no exact plans to upgrade?
Me too. I'm a Debian user, so I'm sticking with 2.64 as long as it's
working well. Unless 3.X goes into Sarge, which I suspect is unlikely.
I am also a Debian user, running Debian woody
Yes, I even reboote the machine. It is a very odd issue, it writes to the
console and the screen.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:40 PM
Subject: Re: Somewhat OT postfix question
I made
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 07:27 PM 1/6/2005, Simon Byrnand wrote:
- The rewrite_subject and subject_tag configuration options were
deprecated and are now removed. Instead, using rewrite_header Subject
[your desired setting]. e.g.
rewrite_subject 1
Yes, and SURBLs are supported by default in SpamAssassin 3.X if
you have network tests enabled and a recent Net::DNS.
http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#nettest
Jerry,
What version of SpamAssassin are you running?
Jeff C.
__
On Thursday, January 6, 2005, 6:53:02 PM, David Groce wrote:
Basically
Hi,
it's my birthday, so please forgive me to be somewhat off topic ;-)
I want to say THANK YOU to all developers and contributors of this
wonderful piece of software.
By starting using SA 2.44 around 2 years ago, my users mailboxes look
(nearly) as clean as in the middle of the 90ies.
SA is
Is JP now separate from WS? I currently score it as 1.5 or something
because anything hitting JP would hit WS too. On the surbl webpage it
says it's not separate yet, but the score below makes me think maybe it is.
And to stay on topic, of the 52,180 spams tagged or deleted by my mail
server
I hope that I am sending this to the correct address
--
I am running SA 3.0
on RH9
using Sendmail 8.12.8 and Procmail 3.22.
Procmail invokes SA by | /usr/bin/spamc
I control the RH9 machine via SSH using PuTTy
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:59:47AM -0800, Robert Markin wrote:
Now I do not ever get hits from either of these two. Is there some way
that I can check to see if something has become fowled-up? If I try to
run spamassassin with the -D --lint options, it creates an output so
long that I
Hi,
I'm trying to install Spamassassin 3 on a Linux box w/Ensim control panel
installed, but I'm experiencing a variety of errors. I've modified each
users' .procmailrc file, but the logs are showing that spamc cannot be found
(regardless of how I address it, and I know it's there - I can run it
|-Original Message-
|From: bubba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 07 January 2005 10:28
|To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
|Subject: SA 3 - I'm Totally Stuck!
|
|Hi,
|
|I'm trying to install Spamassassin 3 on a Linux box w/Ensim
|control panel installed, but I'm experiencing a variety
Rainer Sokoll wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:59:47AM -0800, Robert Markin wrote:
Now I do not ever get hits from either of these two. Is there some way
that I can check to see if something has become fowled-up? If I try to
run spamassassin with the -D --lint options, it creates an output
|-Original Message-
|From: Robert Markin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 07 January 2005 10:00
|To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
|Subject: DCC and Razor2 have completely stopped hitting
|
|I hope that I am sending this to the correct address
|
Drop the -u [EMAIL PROTECTED], its not needed since its
being run as the user and is semi- obsolete anyway. Plus
you don't put @domain for a username.
Martin
The @ symbol does actually exist in the username - the -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
parameter worked OK in SA 2.6.
I've tried removing -u
On Friday, January 7, 2005, 1:33:49 AM, Daniel Kleinsinger wrote:
Is JP now separate from WS? I currently score it as 1.5 or something
because anything hitting JP would hit WS too. On the surbl webpage it
says it's not separate yet, but the score below makes me think maybe it is.
JP is
|-Original Message-
|From: bubba [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: 07 January 2005 11:04
|To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
|Subject: RE: SA 3 - I'm Totally Stuck!
|
| Drop the -u [EMAIL PROTECTED], its not needed since its being run
| as the user and is semi- obsolete anyway. Plus you
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:04:27AM -, bubba wrote:
/usr/bin/spamc: /usr/bin/spamc: cannot execute binary file
[...]
Is this a problem with permissions? If I SSH into the box I can run
/usr/bin/spamc from the command line and it works just fine.
Are you sure that the user calling procmail
notice my .procmailrc has a lot more enviroment settings, don't know
enough about procmail to know if they are all needed but here's my
.procmailrc as an expample that works fine for various users:-
[snip]
I tried that, but not luck unfortunately :(
Are you sure that the user calling procmail is the same user you are if
you
run spamc from the command line?
When I run spamc from the command line, I've done so as root. I take it I
need to change the permission of spamc?
Oh, and happy birthday!
mil
--On Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:06 PM -0800 Dan Hollis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It would ease migrating to 3.0.x a great deal for many sites to support
backwards compatibility. Instead, stuff breaks. This is why people are
so hesitant to move to php5, perl6 etc. spamassassin should not follow
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Koch wrote:
Has anyone come up with a script or method that would allow users to
forward their false positive and false negative emails back to an
address on the mailserver where they can be used to train the Bayes
database. I understand that Bayes needs the email in its original
Here, spamc has 555 (-r-xr-xr-x), owned by root.
I am pretty sure that these are the default permissions set by make
install.
My permissions are exactly the same (with group mail).
Anyway: to test whatever software, it is wise to switch to the user who
will
run this software.
I thought
Anyone have any examples of how to read the X-Spam-Level:
and delete messages if the score is over 15?
That would tend to be a function of your MTA. Ours can't use * since that's
the wildcard character for rules, so we use +. Then we configure a rule like
if header is
-Original Message-
From: Jerry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 1:24 PM
To: spam
Subject: Win32, Autodeleting messages with high scores?
Anyone have any examples of how to read the X-Spam-Level:
and delete messages if the score is over
-Original Message-
From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 4:17 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SARE rules timing out?
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you saying that using spamd/c gives you problems for
users who have
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:20:23AM -0800, Bret Miller wrote:
Anyone have any examples of how to read the X-Spam-Level:
and delete messages if the score is over 15?
That would tend to be a function of your MTA.
nitpick
s/T/U/
/nitpick
Rainer
Can someone tell me how I would redirect spam to an imap mailbox in qmail?
I use .qmail files that run ifspamh (the modified version that allows
you to set a destination address to redirect email to)
So a sample .qmail file looks like this:
| /usr/bin/ifspamh derekbspam 1
./Maildir/
Can I do
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Sokoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 9:43 AM
To: 'SpamAssassin list'
Subject: Re: Win32, Autodeleting messages with high scores?
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:20:23AM -0800, Bret Miller wrote:
Anyone have any examples of how to
Hi,
I've made some progress, but it's still not working :(
Procmail is now running spamc, but the maillog shows the error:
Jan 7 15:51:36 srv01 spamd[1314]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at port 34674
Jan 7 15:51:36 srv01 spamd[1314]: info: setuid to root succeeded
Jan 7
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:27:38 -, bubba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to install Spamassassin 3 on a Linux box w/Ensim control panel
installed
Meaning you're trying to install it through the control panel rather
than using a real login shell? Or only meaning that you're using
Ensim to
Meaning you're trying to install it through the control panel rather than
using a real
login shell? Or only meaning that you're using Ensim to set up the
.procmailrc files?
I'm doing everything via the shell.
And did you install 2.6x yourself?
Yep. The last email I sent has a bit more
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:15:41PM -, bubba wrote:
Procmail is now running spamc,
What caused the problem?
If I specify the user with the -u flag, I get the error:
Jan 7 15:59:29 srv01 spamd[1313]: handle_user: unable to find user 'mil'!
Does getent passwd find the user mil? Is spamd
Rainer Sokoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
on 01/07/2005 02:10:26 AM:
Hi,
it's my birthday, so please forgive me to be somewhat off topic ;-)
I want to say THANK YOU to all developers and contributors
of this
wonderful piece of software.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY! Enjoy an extra Kolsch for me
;-)
Andy
What version of SpamAssassin are you running?
Running 3
Jeff C.
I currently use the spamcop RBL..
This morning I had 96 spam messages. 77 were detected by SA.
- Original Message -
From: David Groce [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jerry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: spam users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: Too much spam
On Friday, January 7, 2005, 8:43:30 AM, Jerry Jerry wrote:
I currently use the spamcop RBL..
to you mean bl.spamcop.net or sc.surbl.org. The two are not
the same.
This morning I had 96 spam messages. 77 were detected by SA.
Do you mean an 80% detection rate? That's not too bad, though
it
On Friday, January 7, 2005, 8:46:41 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
On Friday, January 7, 2005, 8:43:30 AM, Jerry Jerry wrote:
I currently use the spamcop RBL..
to you mean bl.spamcop.net or sc.surbl.org. The two are not
the same.
That should read:
Do you mean bl.spamcop.net or sc.surbl.org?
Jeff C.
On Friday, January 7, 2005, 9:08:32 AM, Jerry Jerry wrote:
I have my mail server rejecting he messages if they are in the following
RBL's before they even reach SA3.
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
bl.spamcop.net
multi.surbl.org
blacklist.spambag.org
These messages are being blocked as they are
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 10:42:01AM -0400, Derek Billingsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can someone tell me how I would redirect spam to an imap mailbox in qmail?
I use .qmail files that run ifspamh (the modified version that allows
you to set a destination address to redirect email to)
So a
Jeff,
I have my mail server rejecting he messages if they are in the following
RBL's before they even reach SA3.
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
bl.spamcop.net
multi.surbl.org
blacklist.spambag.org
These messages are being blocked as they are received by our server. The 96
messages that came through are
From: Rainer Sokoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:59:50AM -, bubba wrote:
Are you sure that the user calling procmail is the same user you are
if
you
run spamc from the command line?
When I run spamc from the command line, I've done so as root. I take it
I
need
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are you saying that using spamd/c gives you problems for
users who have
their own local rules? Just curious as to what problem?
--Chris
all
Tinkering with a new box for my SA and just noticed that the bayes + net
score in 3.02 is a lower than in 2.64 and lower for bayes only.
why?
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
At 12:46 PM 1/7/2005, Martin Hepworth wrote:
all
Tinkering with a new box for my SA and just noticed that the bayes + net
score in 3.02 is a lower than in 2.64 and lower for bayes only.
why?
As best I can tell it's score dilution by the URIBLs from SURBL.
See this post from the archives, which
jdow wrote:
From: Rainer Sokoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 11:59:50AM -, bubba wrote:
Are you sure that the user calling procmail is the same user you are
if
you
run spamc from the command line?
When I run spamc from the command line, I've done so as root. I take it
I
need to
Hello,
Is there a way to create a rule that use a external command ? I'd like to
do a rule to filter unknown domain.
Best regard,
PE
At 01:56 PM 1/7/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to create a rule that use a external command ? I'd like to
do a rule to filter unknown domain.
Assuming 3.0.x this is possible. For Older versions, it's not without
hacking the SA code.
You'll need to write a perl plugin to do that.
This was a interesting one, for sudden i noticed mass
of crc errors on my switch (apporx 5%), this cause the
swap problem, after changing the NIC the problem was solved
go
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dienstag, 16. November 2004 14:15
Anyone have any examples of how to read the X-Spam-Level:
and delete messages if the score is over 15?
I am running SA 3 with Modus Mail (www.vircom.com). Whenever
any mail comes
in the system will fire off a batch file that will call SA.
Currently not running
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:41:06 -0500, Shane Mullins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I even reboote the machine. It is a very odd issue, it writes to the
console and the screen.
When you say console and the screen do you mean that you see the
amavisd-new output even when you ssh into the box or
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:33:34 -0700, Bob Proulx [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
who's still on 2.64 with no exact plans to upgrade?
Me too. I'm a Debian user, so I'm sticking with 2.64 as long as it's
working well. Unless 3.X goes into Sarge,
Hello all,
I have SpamAssassin version 2.63 with pyzor installed. When I type
spamassassin -D /home/spam/mail/saved-messages
at the command line I get
debug: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: entering helper-app run mode
debug:
I think this is an easy question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer. If I'm using spamassassin 3, invoking it via procmail as just
'spamassassin' and testing for the result, and I trust that any message
carrying a URL that's listed on surbl.org or spamhaus.org is 100% spam,
what file(s)
Scott Wertz wrote:
I think this is an easy question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer. If I'm using spamassassin 3, invoking it via procmail as just
'spamassassin' and testing for the result, and I trust that any message
carrying a URL that's listed on surbl.org or spamhaus.org is 100%
At 12:06 AM 1/7/2005, Dan Hollis wrote:
I think he meant, why _remove_ the old syntax instead of supporting it _in
addition to_ the new syntax?
I can't see any good reason not to support old syntax as backwards
compatibility.
Hmm, as a user that makes sense. As a programmer, it does not. There's
Scott Wertz wrote:
I think this is an easy question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer. If I'm using spamassassin 3, invoking it via procmail as
just
'spamassassin' and testing for the result, and I trust that any
message
carrying a URL that's listed on surbl.org or spamhaus.org
On 01/07/05 09:51 PM, Michele Neylon::Blacknight Solutions sat at the `puter
and typed:
Scott Wertz wrote:
I think this is an easy question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer. If I'm using spamassassin 3, invoking it via procmail as just
'spamassassin' and testing for the result,
Good evening, Scott,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Scott Wertz wrote:
I think this is an easy question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer. If I'm using spamassassin 3, invoking it via procmail as just
'spamassassin' and testing for the result, and I trust that any message
carrying a URL that's
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:58, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Couldn't you just increase the scores to 100?
That would be tha answer. I believe how might also have been part of
that question.
I thought it was...sorry if I wasn't clear, but how is exactly what
I'm after.
Search for the URIBL_*
On 01/07/05 05:05 PM, Scott Wertz sat at the `puter and typed:
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:58, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Couldn't you just increase the scores to 100?
That would be tha answer. I believe how might also have been part of
that question.
I thought it was...sorry if I wasn't
On 01/07/05 05:03 PM, William Stearns sat at the `puter and typed:
Good evening, Scott,
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Scott Wertz wrote:
I think this is an easy question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer. If I'm using spamassassin 3, invoking it via procmail as just
'spamassassin' and
Louis LeBlanc wrote:
On 01/07/05 05:05 PM, Scott Wertz sat at the `puter and typed:
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 16:58, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Couldn't you just increase the scores to 100?
That would be tha answer. I believe how might also have been part of
that question.
I thought it was...sorry if I
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 17:10, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
So you might want to add the following to your user_prefs:
score URIBL_WS_SURBL 0 100 0 100
That *is* the per-user basis. Each user has a
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file. Just put your score mods there.
forehead slap
So it is.
Do the Bayes journal options (bayes_journal_max_size,
bayes_learn_to_journal) have any effect when you use MySQL as the Bayes
database?
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 05:39:44PM -0500, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Do the Bayes journal options (bayes_journal_max_size,
bayes_learn_to_journal) have any effect when you use MySQL as the Bayes
database?
No.
Michael
pgp9V5vhmX9d8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
Hmm, as a user that makes sense. As a programmer, it does not. There's
nothing like adding backward compatibility kludges to add bugs to your
code. Bugs mean extra work for the developers, work that could be better
spent fighting spam.
I guess it's
On 01/07/05 05:17 PM, Scott Wertz sat at the `puter and typed:
I'm really regretting my new year's resolution to switch to
decaf.
Blasphemer!!! :)
--
Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :)
http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ
79 matches
Mail list logo
