At 02:42 AM 1/18/2005, jdow wrote:
Spam really did come from 164.109.26.27. Is DigiEx not marked in any
of the BLs around?
Why would digex be listed? AFAIK they are an fairly well behaved nowdays. I
mean, sure they were notorious in the 1990's, but recently?
No listing in any blacklists:
http://w
At 05:49 PM 1/18/2005, Will Yardley wrote:
How smart is SpamAssassin when dealing with whitelisted / blacklisted
email addresses and the bayes module? For instance, is it necessary
to retrain email which is spam (and would have been marked as spam
other than the whitelisting) if the sender or recip
At 04:44 PM 1/18/2005, Pat Traynor wrote:
Lately, I've been having rather high load averages lately on my web/mail
server. From what I can tell, the html traffic hasn't gone up that
much, so I've got to assume that it's mail-related. Here's the
beginning of a "top" that I just ran, sorted by memo
At 06:08 PM 1/18/2005, Brian Ipsen wrote:
I've got two different mailservers, both using SA 3.0.2 and Qmail-Scanner
1.24 st One had SA 3.0.2 when QS was configured, the other one has been
upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.2 recently...
In the maillog from the one, who initially had 3.0.2, I get these
spamstats.pl
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
> What is a good script that folks are using to generate SA stats off a mail
> log?
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org
To be notified of up
What is a good script that folks are using to generate SA stats off a mail
log?
Hi,
I've got two different mailservers, both using SA 3.0.2 and Qmail-Scanner
1.24 st One had SA 3.0.2 when QS was configured, the other one has been
upgraded from 2.64 to 3.0.2 recently...
In the maillog from the one, who initially had 3.0.2, I get these log
entries:
Jan 18 23:16:12 wbel s
How smart is SpamAssassin when dealing with whitelisted / blacklisted
email addresses and the bayes module? For instance, is it necessary
to retrain email which is spam (and would have been marked as spam
other than the whitelisting) if the sender or recipient address is
whitelisted?
> At 03:50 AM 1/18/2005, kalin mintchev wrote:
>>spamassassin -D --lint test.txt
>>
>>where test.txt is a spam message i just used with sa-learn. here is what
>> i
>>get for the bayes:
>>
>>debug: cannot use bayes on this message; not enough usable tokens found
>>debug: bayes: not scoring message,
Lately, I've been having rather high load averages lately on my web/mail
server. From what I can tell, the html traffic hasn't gone up that
much, so I've got to assume that it's mail-related. Here's the
beginning of a "top" that I just ran, sorted by memory usage.
4:17pm up 3 days, 4
Is there a way, or a work around to disable bayes on the command line,
similar to using
spamassassin -t -L to disable Network tests?
i realise i could copy my config , disable bayes in the copied config
and then use -C, but maybe a command line option that allowed the
specification of a single
It seems ok on my system
linux stock 2.2.17
perl 5.8.6
dunno what other libs might make a difference.
i ran it like this:
wget -O - http://mail.units.it/6474 |spamassassin -t -D
it scored thus:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=15.1 required=9.5 tests=BAYES_50,J_CHICKENPOX_26,
J_CHICKENPOX_31,J_CHIC
Christian Recktenwald wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:56:22AM +, Stefano Catani wrote:
here is the message:
http://mail.units.it/6474
it contains a lot of email addresses and stops our mailserver
these are the times on a dual PIII 1GHz (SpamAssassin 3.0.2)
time spamc < 6474
real9m59.995s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Are there any memory problems for SA version 3.0.1? We recently upgraded
> to 2 gigs of memory on the server and SA just gobbled up the memory. We
> dip down to under 20 megs here and there and 30-40 megs the rest of the
>
>
>Huh. Reverse DNS on my business DSL line from Verizon comes out as
>bdsl.66.15.96.103.gte.net
>
>(One thing I've asked their tech is if they would delegate reverse DNS
>to my name server, but the tech had no idea what I was talking about.
>I'll try again later ...)
Ditto for Conversent :/
--
j o a r wrote:
I was _hammered_ all throughout last year by messages to unknown
accounts from machines in the sc0pub.verizon.net segment (nn = 01 -
99). Eventually I had to blacklist anything matching that pattern. Seems
to be a lot more quiet now though.
Actually, I suspect those are (misguided
Menno van Bennekom wrote:
Mojo wrote:
Alas, I'm moving to a Verizon business DSL account for my server. Is
there any distinction between residential DSL and business DSL in their
network addresses?
I don't know but my postfix check on dsl-verizon.net is based on DNS not
on ip-address. So if you ch
> Mojo wrote:
> Alas, I'm moving to a Verizon business DSL account for my server. Is
> there any distinction between residential DSL and business DSL in their
> network addresses?
I don't know but my postfix check on dsl-verizon.net is based on DNS not
on ip-address. So if you change the dsl-veriz
Are there any memory problems for SA version 3.0.1? We recently upgraded
to 2 gigs of memory on the server and SA just gobbled up the memory. We
dip down to under 20 megs here and there and 30-40 megs the rest of the
time. I lowered the number of processes from 15 to 10 and according to top
the RSS
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:56:22AM +, Stefano Catani wrote:
> here is the message:
> http://mail.units.it/6474
>
> it contains a lot of email addresses and stops our mailserver
>
> these are the times on a dual PIII 1GHz (SpamAssassin 3.0.2)
>
> time spamc < 6474
> real9m59.995s
> user
At 03:50 AM 1/18/2005, kalin mintchev wrote:
spamassassin -D --lint test.txt
where test.txt is a spam message i just used with sa-learn. here is what i
get for the bayes:
debug: cannot use bayes on this message; not enough usable tokens found
debug: bayes: not scoring message, returning undef
debug
Our system seems to be getting sporadic at times, all of the sudden spam
will flood in and after checking the header I am finding this on the
messages getting by:
SpamAssassin (SpamAssassin rebuilding)
We are running sa-learn as a cron job.
I am currently running this in our cron job.
#! /bin/s
Works now.
Thanks.
Matt
Matt
install Net::DNS from CPAN
perl -MCPAN -eshell
install Net::DNS
the RH RPMs are nortious at sticking stuff in stupid places that only
other RH RPM based packages can see.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Matt wrote
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 04:58:12PM +0100, ADNET GHISLAIN wrote:
> I use spamassassin 2.64 and i want to configure it so every mail sent
> by the local server is whitelisted or not even scanned by spamassassin.
The only way to skip being scanned by spamassassin is not to call it.
You need to config
Hi,
I use spamassassin 2.64 and i want to configure it so every mail sent
by the local server is whitelisted or not even scanned by spamassassin.
I tried quite a lot of config but whatever the config i try i allways
have the localhost sent that is tagged as spam.
spamassassin --lint and debug give
Menno van Bennekom wrote:
You have sent this mail to the list through out014pub.verizon.net and not
directly from your own dsl-verizon.net address so you wouldn't have been
blocked by me ;)
Menno
Alas, I'm moving to a Verizon business DSL account for my server. Is
there any distinction between re
Hm...
time spamc < 6474
real0m3.040s
user0m0.001s
sys 0m0.008s
This is a PIII 1.3. (SA 3.0.2)
Might be something in your config?
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefano Catani
> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 5:56 AM
> To: us
here is the message:
http://mail.units.it/6474
it contains a lot of email addresses and stops our mailserver
these are the times on a dual PIII 1GHz (SpamAssassin 3.0.2)
time spamc < 6474
real9m59.995s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
any suggestions ???
Thanks
Stefano
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:33:55 +, Martin Hepworth
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
probably means you sa 2.x rules don't parse in the SA 3.x world
have you "spamassassin --lint" checked to if it gives you any more info
ot does it die here as well.??
It's a clean installation, I dont't have a
Hi
probably means you sa 2.x rules don't parse in the SA 3.x world
have you "spamassassin --lint" checked to if it gives you any more info
ot does it die here as well.??
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
German Staltari wrote:
Hi list, I've up
Hi list, I've upgraded to 3.0.2 and now I'm seeing this in my logs:
Jan 18 10:03:17 qsmtp-mx-06 spamd[20906]: Use of uninitialized value in
pattern match (m//) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Message.pm line 225,
line 76.
Jan 18 10:12:42 qsmtp-mx-01 spamd[29014]: Use of uniniti
I was missing the big picture, I think now I will be able to make it work as
expected. Thanks all for the help.
Angelo
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Arend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 5:06 PM
Subject: Re: Begginer Spam getting through
-BEGIN PGP SIGN
FYI, to anyone who runs into the same problem, there is a patched
version of qmail-scanner.pl that allow you to include SA-created headers
(plus other cool options not in the original):
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/j.toribio/qmail-scanner/READMEpatched.html
-Roger
on 18.01.2005 12:30 Roger WJ Alterskjær said the following:
on 17.01.2005 19:47 Andy Jezierski said the following:
[snip]
I don't use qmail-scanner, but do
you
have to re-start
it for new config changes to take effect? Does qmail-scanner have it's
own config file that overrides SA
on 17.01.2005 19:47 Andy Jezierski said the following:
[snip]
I don't use qmail-scanner, but do you
have to re-start
it for new config changes to take effect? Does qmail-scanner have it's
own config file that overrides SA like amavisd-new?
qmail-scanner.pl is called when receiving and email.
Hi
There has been a few posts about this error but so far no solution.
I have a mail which, when sent to spamd with spamc, causes spamd to
consume a lot of memory and cpu time. The scanning takes about 30
seconds for this mail of approx. 200 kB but the real problem is that it
causes spamd to go f
Matt
install Net::DNS from CPAN
perl -MCPAN -eshell
install Net::DNS
the RH RPMs are nortious at sticking stuff in stupid places that only
other RH RPM based packages can see.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Matt wrote:
Alright, I think I ha
i rebuild the databases as root. with new unmarked spam and new ham. i
used spamassassin as root like:
spamassassin -D --lint test.txt
where test.txt is a spam message i just used with sa-learn. here is what i
get for the bayes:
debug: cannot use bayes on this message; not enough usable tokens f
Loren Wilton wrote:
For some days BAYES probabilty jump for almost all messages, i've
BAYES_50 for almost all message including ham...
What can be the reason ?
Why do you think bayes 50 is wrong? BTW: Bayes_50 I would consider as ham.
Bayes_50 means th
On Monday, January 17, 2005, 11:57:26 PM, Matt Matt wrote:
> Alright, I think I have figured something out by turning spamd -D debug
> mode on.
> Net::DNS version is 0.23, but need 0.34dnsavailable-1 at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 1230.
> Thing is I just inst
On 2005-01-18, at 08.49, Menno van Bennekom wrote:
You have sent this mail to the list through out014pub.verizon.net and
not
directly from your own dsl-verizon.net address so you wouldn't have
been
blocked by me ;)
I was _hammered_ all throughout last year by messages to unknown
accounts from ma
Alright, I think I have figured something out by turning spamd -D debug
mode on.
Net::DNS version is 0.23, but need 0.34dnsavailable-1 at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 1230.
Thing is I just installed "perl-Net-DNS-0.48-0.1.fc2.rf.i386.rpm". So I
double check.
> Hey now, you all. I have a Verizon address, and to the best of my ability,
> unless I set up SSH tunneling through them, I cannot send mail from any
> other
> account than mine.
>
> And don't blacklist me!
>
> Rob
You have sent this mail to the list through out014pub.verizon.net and not
directly
Spam really did come from 164.109.26.27. Is DigiEx not marked in any
of the BLs around?
{^_^}
>> I am using Spamassassin 2.63 with SQL-Configuration.
>> When I want to redefine scores in my local.cf it simply does not work. The
>> new Score i am setting will not be used.
>>
>> score MSGID_FROM_MTA_SHORT 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
>>
>> What else do I have to do to make Spamassassin use these new d
> I have this in my local.cf
>
> header MY_MNUMERIC_TO To =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You have "start of line followed by M". The To has "start of line followed by
< followed by M".
Try
header MY_MNUMERIC_TO To =~ /^
I just installed the latest version of 0.48 Net::DNS and still no go.
This is how I start Spamd in rc.local.
/usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m 5
This is running under Exim Exiscan. Looks like it uses spamc -u to connect
to spamd as a given user.
Any other ideas?
Thanks.
Matthew
On Monday, January 17, 200
Never mind - as soon as I sent it my brain registered my mistrake.
{+_+} Duh!
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What part of the rule does the "m" in "m2355" match?
> {^_^}
What part of the rule does the "m" in "m2355" match?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Steven W. Orr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have this in my local.cf
>
> header MY_MNUMERIC_TO To =~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/i
> score MY_MNUMERIC_TO 5.0
> describeMY_MNUMERIC_TO All numer
>> For some days BAYES probabilty jump for almost all messages, i've
>> BAYES_50 for almost all message including ham...
>> What can be the reason ?
>>
> Why do you think bayes 50 is wrong? BTW: Bayes_50 I would consider as ham.
Bayes_50 means that Bayes doesn't know if the message is ham or spam,
On Monday, January 17, 2005, 6:01:28 PM, Matt Matt wrote:
> I have SpamAssassin 3.0.2 installed on Fedora Core 2 release. How do I get
> URIBL_SBL to work?
> I see in "25_uribl.cf":
> # Requires the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL plugin be loaded.
> # Note that this plugin defines a new c
A spammer is suing someone who reported their spam for "Tortuous Interference
with Contract" and "Defamation":
> The defendant knew intentionally and improperly interfered with the
> performance of the said contract by inducing Lightship Telecom and
> Spectra Access, Inc., to terminate the contra
I have SpamAssassin 3.0.2 installed on Fedora Core 2 release. How do I get
URIBL_SBL to work?
I see in "25_uribl.cf":
# Requires the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL plugin be loaded.
# Note that this plugin defines a new config setting, 'uridnsbl',
# which lists the zones to look up in adva
William Stearns wrote:
Good evening, all,
I have a favor to ask. Kennedy Western has written in asking to be
removed from the sa-blacklist - the audacity! :-)
Could I trouble any of you that keep your back spam to grab any
Kennedy Wester spams and send them along to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(
Hi Alex,
Actually you should upgrade your current SA version to 3.0.2.
Best Regards,
-Cor
alexander hachmann said:
> Hello,
> I am using Spamassassin 2.63 with SQL-Configuration.
> When I want to redefine scores in my local.cf it simply does not work. The
> new Score i am setting will not be us
On Monday, January 17, 2005, 3:51:14 PM, William Stearns wrote:
> Good evening, all,
> I have a favor to ask. Kennedy Western has written in asking to
> be removed from the sa-blacklist - the audacity! :-)
> Could I trouble any of you that keep your back spam to grab any
> Kenne
56 matches
Mail list logo
