Hello,
I have problem with timeouts on FreeBSD 5.2 with milter-spamc-0.25
(spamass-milter-0.2.0_5 same problem too), p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2 .
When I get spam with "X-SpamDetected:1" in header, I get following error
in my maillog :
milter-spamc[585]:timeout before input from SPAMD server
mi
I'm
doing a new install on a Fedora Core 3 AMD 64 box with the 64 bit OS.
I'm getting the following error:
Jan 24 14:42:00 localhost spamd[4661]: Use of inherited AUTOLOAD for
non-method Time::HiRes::time() is deprecated at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 1103.
So -
On Jan 24, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:41:47PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
regarding X-Spam-Report.
-D is debug, it's not related to logging level (there is no "verbose
logging"
option iirc).
Here's what I do with it
http://www.junkemailfilter.com/how-spam-filter-works.htm
Grades of Spam
Ham ** -2 points and down. -
Automatically learned.
Non Spam ** -2 to 5 points. - Not
automatically learned
Low Spam ** 5 - 15 points. - Passed and
Tagged. Not automatically lea
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:41:47PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
> Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
> regarding X-Spam-Report.
-D is debug, it's not related to logging level (there is no "verbose logging"
option iirc).
> Unfortunately for me I'll have to resort to
At 06:05 PM 1/24/2005, Craig McLean wrote:
The question is: What other use is there for this "guaranteed" spam I am
getting? It's only about 40 messages a day but is it useful to anyone
else, or should I just keep deleting it?
You could feed it to spamassassin -r instead of sa-learn --spam. But tha
I'm trying to install spamassassin on a SuSE 9.2 system, and use SQL
Bayes, AWL, and user prefs.
I uninstalled the 3.0.0 package that SuSE came with, and set up local.cf
with all the SQL connection variables.
make test works perfectly in my build directory, including the SQL tests.
After instal
All,
I don't have a massive mail system. Just 2 users, of which this is
one ;-) and ~200 messages a day.
In order to train bayes I created a junk user and seeded it to a few
messageboards to get it on the spam lists. The account isn't used for
anything else so every message is spam and gets learned
"Paul Smicker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/24/2005 04:41:47 PM:
> Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
> regarding X-Spam-Report.
>
> Unfortunately for me I'll have to resort to manually munging 10_misc.cf.
>
>
> On Jan 24, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Rainer Sokoll wr
Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
regarding X-Spam-Report.
Unfortunately for me I'll have to resort to manually munging 10_misc.cf.
On Jan 24, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Rainer Sokoll wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:27:35PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
Does spamd have a v
Steve Prior wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Whats strange is i was forced into using verizon. I called 3 other
DSL companies who i KNOW have DSL in my area (my company uses one of
them and they are less than 1 mile away) and they all claim that its
not available. Verizon was the only one who actually s
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:27:35PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
> Does spamd have a verbose logging option?
-D (at least in 3.0.2)
Rainer
Paul Smicker wrote:
On Jan 24, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
"Paul Smicker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/24/2005 01:19:28 PM:
> Hi All--
>
> I've been trying for the past few days to remove the "Spam detection
> software, running on the system..." preamble and content preview from
On Jan 24, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Andy Jezierski wrote:
"Paul Smicker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/24/2005 01:19:28 PM:
> Hi All--
>
> I've been trying for the past few days to remove the "Spam detection
> software, running on the system..." preamble and content preview
from
> my X-Spam-Repor
Well it was a nice trip to MIT. Here is the quick and dirty of it:
Caveat: I missed the 2 first presentations. Damn traffic!
No new "WOW!" techniques were introduced. There were some decent data
analysis but nothing that screamed it would flag a large volume of spam. The
techniques that were int
Steve Prior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/24/2005
02:12:08 PM:
> I think I'm ready to take the next step and upgrade my SA
> installation to a milter setup which rejects mail over a
> certain threshold. It looks like there are at least 2 milters
> out there - is there one that is the current b
"Paul Smicker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/24/2005 01:19:28 PM:
> Hi All--
>
> I've been trying for the past few days to remove the "Spam detection
> software, running on the system..." preamble and content preview
from
> my X-Spam-Report header, with no success.
>
> I have in local.cf:
>
I think I'm ready to take the next step and upgrade my SA
installation to a milter setup which rejects mail over a
certain threshold. It looks like there are at least 2 milters
out there - is there one that is the current best? Does anyone
have a howto about setting up an SA milter with sendmail?
Hi All--
I've been trying for the past few days to remove the "Spam detection
software, running on the system..." preamble and content preview from
my X-Spam-Report header, with no success.
I have in local.cf:
report_safe 0
remove_header all Report
add_header all Report score=_SCORE_ tests=_TEST
On Jan 24, 2005, at 1:00 AM, Cor wrote:
hahaha, pay me a few extra thousand a month and I will mount a cell
phone
tower on my head and carry it around hehehe. ;)
I was chatting with a fellow who was a volunteer fireman at one of the
local firehouses. he said they got over $10k/month to host a m
>-Original Message-
>From: Steve Prior [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:55 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: OT: Crippled Verizon phones
>
>
>Kelson wrote:
>
>> jdow wrote:
>>
>>> Blame that on NIMBYs in your neighborhood who do not want
>an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 24. Januar 2005 18:37 schrieb Damir Cosic:
> Hello Everybody,
>
>
> I started using spamassassin a while ago with version 2.X.X and it was
> working great. It quickly decreased level of spam in my inbox to 1-3% of
> total spam that was being
Kelson wrote:
jdow wrote:
Blame that on NIMBYs in your neighborhood who do not want an unsightly
cellphone tower there.
Something I've started to see here in southern California is cell phone
towers disguised as palm trees. Suspiciously symmetrical palm trees
with oddly straight trunks, very re
jdow wrote:
Blame that on NIMBYs in your neighborhood who do not want an unsightly
cellphone tower there.
Something I've started to see here in southern California is cell phone
towers disguised as palm trees. Suspiciously symmetrical palm trees
with oddly straight trunks, very regular bark patt
On Jan 24, 2005, at 9:37 AM, Damir Cosic wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I started using spamassassin a while ago with version 2.X.X and it was
working great. It quickly decreased level of spam in my inbox to 1-3%
of
total spam that was being sent to my address. I use it on my Mandrake
10
workstation by
On Jan 24, 2005, at 9:37 AM, Damir Cosic wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I started using spamassassin a while ago with version 2.X.X and it was
working great. It quickly decreased level of spam in my inbox to 1-3%
of
total spam that was being sent to my address. I use it on my Mandrake
10
workstation by
Jim Maul wrote:
Whats strange is i was forced into using verizon. I called 3 other DSL
companies who i KNOW have DSL in my area (my company uses one of them
and they are less than 1 mile away) and they all claim that its not
available. Verizon was the only one who actually saw DSL available on
>-Original Message-
>From: Jason Gauthier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 10:56 AM
>To: SPAMASSASSIN
>Subject: Help analyzing the determination of spam
>
>
>Nice subject!
>
>I attached a message to this email that got an incredibly low spam
>score.
>When I run th
Hello Everybody,
I started using spamassassin a while ago with version 2.X.X and it was
working great. It quickly decreased level of spam in my inbox to 1-3% of
total spam that was being sent to my address. I use it on my Mandrake 10
workstation by piping all messages from Evolution through spa
Loren Wilton wrote:
I have a verizon dsl as a secondary broadband connection. It took just
over 2 months (38 days) from the date it was installed to the date it
actually worked. Since then its been extremely reliable. If you can deal
with the setup headaches (9 phone calls in total) then it real
What in the name of the great Fubar is an "autobundle" and how might
one gutsy enough to use one go about doing it? (More and more I find
myself starting to lean far over to the "wrong side" in an ancient
battle in this group)
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: "Nix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 12:28 AM 1/24/2005, Robert Menschel wrote:
I agree with Matt, but temper that with the realization that
a) many of us have private rules which aren't published, and
b) the more complex those rules are, the more reliable they can be
(ie: they're harder for spammers to fake successfully).
Agree
Greetings.
On Monday 24 January 2005 06:28, Robert Menschel wrote:
> If anyone knows enough about the characteristics of the X-Face header
> to enable us to create a /good/ rule about it, please let me know
> offlist, and maybe we can make something work.
The X-Face header is a 48×48 1-bit bitmap
On 20 Jan 2005, Daniel Quinlan whispered secretively:
> How do you remove a package installed with CPAN, anyway?
Generate an autobundle, edit it, `rm -rf' your site-perl directory, and
reinstall the autobundle. (Yes, it's a sick half-witted kludge.)
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> hahaha, pay me a few extra thousand a month and I will mount a cell phone
> tower on my head and carry it around hehehe. ;)
> -Cor
Try saying that in my vicinity, when I've just had one put up less that 200
Yards from my garden, in the farmland behind, with two small ki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> If anyone knows enough about the characteristics of the X-Face header to
> enable us to create a /good/ rule about it, please let me know offlist, and
> maybe we can make something work.
Well, this is my X-Face header:
X-face: 8uq^'/OJ!4Z(_rrhn"=RC"(EN3f9p6#r=#*=Vhfd4)
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I have a verizon dsl as a secondary broadband connection. It took just
> > over 2 months (38 days) from the date it was installed to the date it
> > actually worked. Since then its been extremely reliable. If you can
deal
> > with the setup headaches
hahaha, pay me a few extra thousand a month and I will mount a cell phone
tower on my head and carry it around hehehe. ;)
-Cor
Jonathan Nichols said:
>
>> Blame that on NIMBYs in your neighborhood who do not want an unsightly
>> cellphone tower there.
>
> Don't forget the NIMBYs that think cell t
> I have a verizon dsl as a secondary broadband connection. It took just
> over 2 months (38 days) from the date it was installed to the date it
> actually worked. Since then its been extremely reliable. If you can deal
> with the setup headaches (9 phone calls in total) then it really is a good
Tristan,
Sunday, January 23, 2005, 9:58:15 AM, Matt responded to:
MK> At 11:34 AM 1/23/2005, Tristan Miller wrote:
>>I'd like to propose a new rule to help SpamAssassin decide whether
>>or not a given message is spam. ...
MK> The only problem with simple comp rules like this one is that
MK> spa
Blame that on NIMBYs in your neighborhood who do not want an unsightly
cellphone tower there.
Don't forget the NIMBYs that think cell towers cause brain cancer or
something silly like that. Local school district wanted to enter into a
contract with one of the carriers (Sprint, I believe) to clam
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > > Sprint most likely forced roamers to use analog because then they could
> > > say
> > > "our digital connection is better".
> >
> > Actually, Sprint just hasn't built out much in the way of rural netw
From: "Steve Sobol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > The thing, now, is that all the services that had analog (Verizon,
> > Cingular) are the ones who have converted over to digital, and still
have
> > their analog services, to this day. One of my coworkers still has an
> > analog Startac, that he uses.
>
>> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>
>> Contrariwise, if you want your DSL service to go completely to hell,
>> switch from AT&T to Verizon. (Joke I've heard - the reason Verizon
>> DSL gives you the first 3 months free is that that's how long it will
>> take them to get it work
> On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:47:05 -0800, you wrote:
>
>
> Contrariwise, if you want your DSL service to go completely to hell,
> switch from AT&T to Verizon. (Joke I've heard - the reason Verizon
> DSL gives you the first 3 months free is that that's how long it will
> take them to get it working pro
45 matches
Mail list logo
