Re: Account # 555711L Spam

2005-07-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 23 July 2005 13:13, jdow wrote: From: Jeffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are they any rules to stop this type of spam? It is continually growing and doesnt ever let up. One thing I discovered is that these spams CAN upset the combination of fetchmail and the Earthlink pop3 server,

Re: ampersand in URLs

2005-07-24 Thread mouss
John Rudd wrote: The only problem I can think of is than an ampersand in a _URL_ is legal (IIRC, in CGI form urls, ampersand is used to delimit different variables, so if the URL question contains some form of context, like ack'ing a sign-up, it might legitimately contain an ). So, you need

Re: Account # 555711L Spam

2005-07-24 Thread Loren Wilton
Haveing a kmail problem the other day, I logged in via the webmail at vz, and found 9 messages, all spam, sitting in the spam folder there. On Dirtlink (which seems from your description to be using the same near-useless webmail as vz) you have a few choices and a very few things that happen

Re: Account # 555711L Spam

2005-07-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 24 July 2005 11:19, Loren Wilton wrote: Haveing a kmail problem the other day, I logged in via the webmail at vz, and found 9 messages, all spam, sitting in the spam folder there. On Dirtlink (which seems from your description to be using the same near-useless webmail as vz) you have

Re: Account # 555711L Spam

2005-07-24 Thread jdow
From: Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wonder if perhaps earthlink is not the only ISP with that problem. I have my vz prefs set to delete any detected spam as I have now switched to a fetchmail based mail suck. Haveing a kmail problem the other day, I logged in via the webmail at vz,

ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

2005-07-24 Thread John T. Yocum
Hello, I've recently noticed that a lot of spam is getting through SpamAssassin, and it's getting the ALL_TRUSTED test listed on it. The issue with that is, I only have one IP trusted, and that's my own mail server. snip from local.cf # Trusted Networks trusted_networks 69.25.118.171 /snip As

Re: Account # 555711L Spam

2005-07-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 24 July 2005 13:39, jdow wrote: From: Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wonder if perhaps earthlink is not the only ISP with that problem. I have my vz prefs set to delete any detected spam as I have now switched to a fetchmail based mail suck. Haveing a kmail problem the other day,

Re: spamc doesn't add headers

2005-07-24 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:31:46AM +0200, christophe wrote: spamd is running perfectly as a daemon. I copied a spam mail in the file 'spam'. Ok. If i run one of these 2 commands : $spamassassin spam $spamc -E spam i get an output with 'X-Spam-Flag: YES', which is what i want to treat the

Re: spamc doesn't add headers

2005-07-24 Thread jdow
christophe, you DO know that cat spam merely prints out your raw spam file so it should not have any markup in it. If you want to view a permanent marked up file you need to run: spamc spam spam_marked_up Or something like that. Remember that spamc takes stdin, filters, and feeds back out

Re: ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

2005-07-24 Thread Ronny Nussbaum
On 7/24/05, John T. Yocum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I've recently noticed that a lot of spam is getting through SpamAssassin, and it's getting the ALL_TRUSTED test listed on it. The issue with that is, I only have one IP trusted, and that's my own mail server. snip from local.cf #

Re: ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

2005-07-24 Thread mouss
John T. Yocum wrote: Hello, I've recently noticed that a lot of spam is getting through SpamAssassin, and it's getting the ALL_TRUSTED test listed on it. The issue with that is, I only have one IP trusted, and that's my own mail server. snip from local.cf # Trusted Networks trusted_networks

Re: (OT) SURBL local-DNS sample file?

2005-07-24 Thread Jeff Chan
On Tuesday, July 19, 2005, 5:24:21 AM, Paolo as2594 wrote: Hi, what follows is certainly OT for SpamAssassin. I am setting up SA3 with SURBL support, and I am configuring RBLDNSD in order to run a local SURBL copy. Before asking for rsync permission, I'd like to test the configuration on

Re: ALL_TRUSTED appearing on spam

2005-07-24 Thread John T. Yocum
OK. I added the internal_networks setting listing my only MX (It's not trusted, as it's used by many other users, and isn't under my control.) snip # Trusted Networks trusted_networks69.25.118.171 # Internal Networks internal_networks 207.234.226.49 /snip OK. So the

Re: URIDNSBL and subdomains

2005-07-24 Thread Jeff Chan
On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 7:28:53 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote: Hello, I've been watching some of the misses that have passed through spamassassin (3.0.4) lately and they are pretty clean; no DNS BL hits, etc. One thing I did notice is that many of them have a fairly contorted URL for

RE: Postfix problem

2005-07-24 Thread Robert Swan
Fixed my own problem with postsuper r ALL thanks for listening Robert Peace he would say instead of goodbyepeace my brother. From: Robert Swan Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 6:10 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Postfix problem