Hello all
Environement:
I'm using Amavisd-new 2.2.1-5 (for Virusscaning) with Postfix 2.1.5 as MTA
and Spamassasin 3.0.3 on a Suse linux 9.0 Host
Normal message process:
SMTPPostfixAmavisd-newPostfixSpamd Relay Host
Failure:
When a special message is incoming (like below)
Josh Berry skrev:
Hi there,
I having a problem with one of our platforms that run spamassassin where
mail seems to be flagged as spam even though it does not hit the score
required. Running
spamassassin -t examplemail
(where examplemail is the full headers and body from a
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Kristopher Austin yowled:
Well, scratch that on IE 6.0, but it definitely happens in Firefox 1.5
with no extensions installed.
I can watch Firefox try .com for any unknown URL before returning an
error. I've tested this on 4 machines to be sure.
This is controlled by
required. Running
spamassassin -t examplemail
(where examplemail is the full headers and body from a message, which is
being sent from actinic catalogue). This gives the output:
The -t option is test and says always give the info as though it was a
spam.
Remove that option and try again.
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:29:02 -0600, you wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:56:48 -0500, you wrote:
On 10/01/2006 8:17 PM, George R. Kasica wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:58:37 -0500, you wrote:
If you can get a strace -ftp PID of the parent spamd process while
this happens (along with a matching
Hi,
I am a developer on a fairly large community site (30-50,000 active users)
with blogs, photo albums and forums.
I spent yesterday tinkering with a spam prevension system which runs each
new comment to a blog post or image in a photo album through SpamAssassin.
I take the provided
Ole Kasper Olsen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said on 11 January 2006 13:36:
Hi,
I am a developer on a fairly large community site (30-50,000 active
users) with blogs, photo albums and forums.
I spent yesterday tinkering with a spam prevension system which runs
each new comment to a blog
I have added Spamassassin 3.1.0 and ClamAV and MailScanner to our new server
running
RHESL-4 and Apache 2.0.52.
When running 'top' I notice that spamassassin uses between 23% - 60% CPU. Is
this
normal?
Bob
___
Robert Isaac
Director/Web
Depends on your hardware, rulesets and amount of incoming mail.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: Robert Isaac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Spamassassin users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:11 PM
Subject: CPU utilisation
I have added Spamassassin 3.1.0 and
Robert Isaac wrote:
I have added Spamassassin 3.1.0 and ClamAV and MailScanner to our new server
running
RHESL-4 and Apache 2.0.52.
When running 'top' I notice that spamassassin uses between 23% - 60% CPU. Is
this
normal?
Depends on your rate of mail and how much CPU you have..
That
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 03/01/2006 5:19 AM, Chris Purves wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting the errormessage below;
Who can help ?
Wolfgang
Jan 2 09:25:58 saxophon spamd[13330]: spamd: connection from
localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 40156
Jan 2 09:25:58 saxophon
Chris Lear wrote:
* Jim Maul wrote (11/01/06 17:48):
[...]
i dont have any sa-stats.pl on my system, and i recall some confusion
with different scripts named the same thing so im not sure. If you can
provide me with a location to obtain the sa-stats.pl script you are
talking about i'll try
Daryl all:
To help get around the problem of SA 3.1 dying here a friend wrote the
following pair of shell scripts:
spamw.bash - run from cron to make sure the spam.bash script hasn't
stopped
spam.bash - watched for spamd to be running and if it stops restarts
it.
Here they are, YMMV, no
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:49 PM
To: Chris Lear
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: rules better than bayes?
Chris Lear wrote:
* Jim Maul wrote (11/01/06 17:48):
[...]
i dont have any
A couple of hours ago I started seeing errors regarding RDJ:
exec: curl -w %{http_code} --compressed -O -R -s -S -z
/var/amavisd/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/rules_du_jour
http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour 21
curl_output: curl: (7) Failed to connect to 208.42.148.125: No route to
host
From: jdow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ole Kasper Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I am a developer on a fairly large community site (30-50,000 active users)
with blogs, photo albums and forums.
I spent yesterday tinkering with a spam prevension system which runs each
new comment to a blog post
Peter wrote:
False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it
detects (how?) an update is required?
Nope.. it always needs to go out over port 80. The check for update is done
using HTTP
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter wrote:
False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it
detects (how?) an update is required?
Nope.. it always needs to go out over port 80. The check for
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I run SA 3.1 on a home system which gets about 200 - 250 msgs a day, the
majority being spam of course. I have 768mb of ram with a swap of 612mb,
an AMD Sempron 1.6GHz processor. This is how spamd is started from
OK, I've built and installed MailScanner 4.49 and SpamAssassin 3.1.0
on a mostly stock Fedora Core 4 box. I'm running Sendmail with a
bunch of RBLs and TLS enabled.
Email comes through MailScanner, but whatever I do, I do not seem to
get any mail to go through SpamAssassin. I tried manually
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:48 -0800, Steve Maller wrote:
OK, I've built and installed MailScanner 4.49 and SpamAssassin 3.1.0
on a mostly stock Fedora Core 4 box. I'm running Sendmail with a
bunch of RBLs and TLS enabled.
Email comes through MailScanner, but whatever I do, I do not seem to
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter wrote:
False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ.
Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it
detects (how?) an update is required?
Nope.. it
On 2.64 I'm not sure what's the forking process. It may be modestly
painful. But an extra 3 seconds every hour and a half is no big tax
to pay on your machine's performance unless you're trying to play
precision timing games in the background. Heck, you could run raw
spamassassin and not really
==_Part_101226_96183233.1137006410573/p
p style=Normal xid=4 props=text-align:left; dom-dir:ltrX-Roving-Queued:
20060111 02:06:50.573/p
p style=Normal xid=5 props=text-align:left; dom-dir:ltrX-Mailer: Roving
Constant Contact 0 (http://www.constantcontact.com)/p
p style=Normal xid=6 props=text-align:left;
dom-dir:ltrX-Return
__
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.caSubject: New Books from Visual Reference Publications
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary==_Part_101226_96183233.1137006410573
X-Roving-Queued: 20060111 02:06:50.573
X-Mailer: Roving
Steve,
People who would like the help you and using a Gmail Account will receive this :
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 8): 553 5.3.0 Rejected 64.233.184.194
found in dnsbl.sorbs.net
Nonsens ...
Uwe
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 7:31:39 PM, you wrote:
P Looks like I had two problems simultaneously. The update issue was not
P causing the error it seems. The real problem I'm encountering appears to
P concern a particular SARE rule. I am running amavisd-new with SA and this
P is
@#$%^ dnsbl.sorbs.net
i took dnsbl.sorbs.net out of my sendmail config
sorry, and thank you
At 7:21 AM +0100 1/12/06, Uwe wrote:
Steve,
People who would like the help you and using a Gmail Account will
receive this :
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state
--- Robert Menschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 7:31:39 PM, you wrote:
P Looks like I had two problems simultaneously. The update issue was
not
P causing the error it seems. The real problem I'm encountering
appears to
P concern a particular
29 matches
Mail list logo
