On Friday 10 March 2006 19:11, Chris Purves wrote:
What I would like to know is, why does the SPF plugin need HELO, when it
can use the from information from the Received header?
I found a discussion on the exim mailing list where it states that the
header does not show HELO information if
We have SA 3.1.0 running on OpenBSD 3.7 i386.
After upgrading to 3.1.1 I issued the command spamassassin --lint and
the following warning appeared:
[25042] warn: rules: failed to run RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 test, skipping:
[25042] warn: _(Can't locate object method new via package
...
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by mx-103.gdicustomers2.ws
(8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id 32Nhzj9ndZMB.) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat
Mar 11 05:40:17 2006) (envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]))
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:40:17 PST
From: Scott Gillespie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Theo Van Dinter writes:
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 06:37:53AM +0100, Jim Knuth wrote:
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200603111700
Mmh, not available: The requested URL
/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.1.tar.gz was not found
Hi all,
Can anyone tell me if it's possible to make SA (3.0.x) save the
X-Spam-Relays-Trusted and X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted pseudoheaders within the
actual headers of each email, or at least somewhere else, so I can see what
they say for each email received? Eg. perhaps there is some setting in
I'm not familiar enough with the newsletters below to know whether
they should be whitelisted. Can anyone confirm that these newsletters
(which apparently do get flagged as spam, at least from time to time)
should be whitelisted? Does anyone have any objections to
whitelisting them?
Bob
Hi All,
I installed 3.1.1 today on a fresh CentOS install and foolishly
neglected to check it hadn't already installed an older version of SA.
Now when I run yum update it lists 3.0.5 as an update. I've installed
3.1.1 from source and am wondering if using yum remove for the 3.0.5
install will
Currently I have spamassassin 3.1.0 working very nicely with exim4 and
courier imap. I am not using razor, pyzor or DCC. My question is is one
preferable over the other and should I use more then one of these options?
--
Daniel Nielsen
Bob Stevens Appliance T.V., Inc.
Building #90 Gabreski
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns.umpquanet.com
...
yet messages that I had hoped would match that whitelist entry
are not. How can I fix this?
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 03:54:00PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
that's odd btw -- the ?update=200603111700 part of the URL is
supposed to avoid that problem, by not picking mirrors that
haven't yet picked up the new files.
I thought the same thing, but it looks like the cgi works such that the
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 12:19:26PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote:
After upgrading to 3.1.1 I issued the command spamassassin --lint and
the following warning appeared:
[25042] warn: _(Can't locate object method new via package
Mail::SpamAssassin::Timeout (perhaps you forgot to load
Is there a What's New list somewhere?
Hi!
Is there a What's New list somewhere?
Did you read Theo's announcement? :
3.1.1 includes a large number of bug fixes and documentation updates.
Here is an abbreviated changelog (since 3.1.0) for major updates (see
the Changes file for a complete list):
- better validate a number of
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 12:58:38PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
Is there a What's New list somewhere?
There was a list in the announcement and there's always the Changes file. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
I can't live the button-down life like you. I want it all! The
terrifying lows, the
James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
^^
Your IP for the ns.museum.rain.com comes back as 65.75.198.49, are you
Hello,
just updated to 3.1.1. while it seems working well, it's introducing a new
error message to my syslog:
Mar 12 21:32:27 machine spamd[6027]: plugin: eval failed: Can't use
string (Net::DNS::RR::MX) as a HASH ref while strict refs in use at
On Monday 13 March 2006 02:31, Daniel Nielsen wrote:
Currently I have spamassassin 3.1.0 working very nicely with exim4 and
courier imap. I am not using razor, pyzor or DCC. My question is is one
preferable over the other and should I use more then one of these options?
I use all three. Often
James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
^^
Your IP for the ns.museum.rain.com comes back as
Hi everybody,
I wanted to know what's the meaning of the following numbers and how could
I customize for example this rule scores...
# DCC
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
score DCC_CHECK 0 1.37 0 2.17
endif # Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
what does 0 1.37 0 and 2.17 mean?
wich one
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
hI,
I wanted to know what's the meaning of the following numbers and how could
I customize for example this rule scores...
# DCC
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
score DCC_CHECK 0 1.37 0 2.17
endif #
On 3/12/2006 2:21 PM, James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns.umpquanet.com
...
yet messages that I had hoped would match that
On 3/12/2006 2:21 PM, James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns.umpquanet.com
...
yet messages that I had
On 3/12/2006 8:13 PM, James Long wrote:
Mail sent via SMTP should have all of it's headers parsed correctly and
your whitelist_from_rcvd should work.
Yet, it doesn't. One of the nightly server log messages has been
getting rejected because SA thinks it is spam, and doesn't see the
Egoitz Aurrekoetxea Aurre wrote:
Hi everybody,
I wanted to know what's the meaning of the following numbers and how could
I customize for example this rule scores...
# DCC
ifplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
score DCC_CHECK 0 1.37 0 2.17
endif # Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
what
24 matches
Mail list logo
