Michael Monnerie wrote:
Anybody else got this problem? Lots of warnings suddenly.
mfg zmi
[31721] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping:
whitelist_from_spf[EMAIL PROTECTED] [31721] warn: config:
failed to parse line, skipping: whitelist_from_spf
Is the SPF plugin enabled?
(This applies to OSX client, not Server)
CPAN doesn't have an uninstall. I use Webmin to install/remove
modules.
Install Webin http://www.webmin.com/osx.html
Remove SA in Webmin
In Terminal
Upgrade CPAN with
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Bundle::CPAN
Then install (you can use webmin):
Hi folks,
I am using spamassassin 3.1.0 and it works well. Now in my institute, we
have 2 mx (mail servers) see it's dns record
myinstitute.edu.tw. 300 IN MX 100 mail2.myinstitute.edu.tw.
myinstitute.edu.tw. 300 IN MX 2 mail1.myinstitute.edu.tw.
Now in most cases, spam goes to mail1 and got
On Freitag, 24. März 2006 09:01 Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Is the SPF plugin enabled? The syntax looks fine, but it can't be
parsed if the plugin isn't loaded.
ARghl. I should not work late night... Thanks.
As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have to disable
the SPF list
Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Freitag, 24. März 2006 09:01 Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Is the SPF plugin enabled? The syntax looks fine, but it can't be
parsed if the plugin isn't loaded.
ARghl. I should not work late night... Thanks.
As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have
Hello everyone,
I'm a newbie here, so please forgive me for asking n00b questions, and
also, I'm not sure whether this is a SA question, but I have to start
somewhere.
My setup is: debian/sarge 3.1, amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.03 (I think
so) and ClamAV. The system is a relay-only server
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, mouss wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea a écrit :
David Lee wrote:
If, conversely, it is not in breach, then SA has a problem: it shouldn't
be marking it INVALID_DATE. Incidentally, it is this aspect (rather
than any other) of the date that is triggering this SA rule,
Hi,
I changed my first mailserver to not accept mail for non-existant accounts (so
these mails do not take SA resources either),
but a lot of spam seems to be sent to the 2nd MX anyway.
So the consequence was to make an account list available to the 2nd server, so
it can reject non-existent
I currently run a Linux relay based around Postfix and Spamassassin.
The hardware is getting old so I'm considering replacing it with an
entry level rack mount server.
I wondered if anyone had any suggestions on appliances that might be
worth looking at that are based around Spamassassin (and
Paul
The defenderMX product from fsl.com is good. No idea of prices, based on
number of CPUs I believe. You provide the hardware and they manage the
software once it's installed.
It's basically a commercial vesrion of MailScanner with a more feature-full
interface.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr
Paul Hutchings writes:
I currently run a Linux relay based around Postfix and Spamassassin.
The hardware is getting old so I'm considering replacing it with an
entry level rack mount server.
I wondered if anyone had any suggestions on appliances that might be
worth looking at that are
the last question,
What rules i need to take ? all ? or only somes (but what ...)
Nobody ??
They have to many rules on the SARE website...
And i don't know what rules i need to take .. ALL ?
(Can i test if the new rules was installed ?? )
Thanks and goodbye :-)
They look a little pricey, which I suppose is to be expected as you're
paying for integration and support I suppose.
I wonder if anything is available that would run on, say, a Mac Mini?
Paul
--
Paul Hutchings
Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd.
Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378
I've seen this as well... it appears (to me) to be related to bayes
token expiring timeouts.
Whenever one of my clients has a timeout on their token expire, the
headers don't get written to the SPAM and the message gets sent on
without headers.
--Will
Hello everyone,
I'm a newbie here,
I've seen this as well... it appears (to me) to be related to bayes
token expiring timeouts.
Whenever one of my clients has a timeout on their token expire, the
headers don't get written to the SPAM and the message gets sent on
without headers.
--Will
Hello everyone,
I'm a newbie here,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sipos Gabor wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hi!
[snip SA not marking some mail]
Where to start looking?
thanks everyone
Gabor Sipos
I had a similar problem here, with only a couple of mail accounts and no
real load to speak of.
I added a global
Hi,
this is a copy'n'paste from a message I wrote in December 2005 to the
AMaViS list.
Hi,
I thought you might like to know how much a commercial solution _very_
similar to amavisd-new+ClamAV+SA+MySQL+mailzu costs.
Something with AV+AS and webQuarantine to be
hi all
my spamassassin is adding "*SPAM*" in some
messages witch isnt one!!
how can ifix it?
i would like configure to "say" it: "hei, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not spam, stop to
change its subject"
=)
Hey folks,
I'm going to be upgrading my mailserver in a month or two,
so I'm running through some different configurations for
SpamAssassin, IMAP, and anti-virus. I'm working on testing the
SQL stuff for user configs and Bayes right now.
So, here are the stats:
Old mailserver
Joshua, C.S. Chen wrote:
Hi folks,
I am using spamassassin 3.1.0 and it works well. Now in my institute,
we have 2 mx (mail servers) see it's dns record
myinstitute.edu.tw. 300 IN MX 100 mail2.myinstitute.edu.tw.
myinstitute.edu.tw. 300 IN MX 2 mail1.myinstitute.edu.tw.
Now in most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler wrote:
Forrest Aldrich wrote:
Such a mechanism would still depend upon some organization on the
server side... as far as I can tell, it's very much to the local
sysadmin (ie: aliases to send to, forward or attach properly,
etc).
Peraps a better option would be to have a users table and setup
referential integrity. Of course that would do no good for MyISAM, but
using that isn't really any better than using BDB, so...
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 09:26:30AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duane Hill wrote:
delete from
On Friday March 24 2006 6:47 am, Num ber wrote:
the last question,
What rules i need to take ? all ? or only somes (but what ...)
Nobody ??
They have to many rules on the SARE website...
And i don't know what rules i need to take .. ALL ?
(Can i test if the new rules was installed ?? )
JuNiOx wrote:
hi all
my spamassassin is adding *SPAM* in some messages witch isnt one!!
how can i fix it?
i would like configure to say it: hei, the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not spam, stop to change its subject
=)
Whitelist them.
--
Thanks,
James
Sander Holthaus wrote:
The problem with using that approach is that you can't authenticate
users. In small, closed, trusted environments it can be useful, but in
most situations, I don't think it will be usable. The nice thing about
using an IMAP-based sollution is that the user is
Hello,
I am trying to use Razor2 with Spamassassin 3 on Gentoo. I have Razor2
installed, but Spamassassin will not use it. If I enable the
use_razor2 1 in my config, I get a warning when I lint/debug that it
failed to parse the line. I have this same problem with DCC, which is
also
Bowie Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) Get rid of the secondary
2) Make the secondary capable of rejecting messages based on spam,
virus, unknown user, etc the same way the primary does.
3) Find a way to have the secondary only accept mail when the
Wess wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use Razor2 with Spamassassin 3 on Gentoo. I have Razor2
installed, but Spamassassin will not use it. If I enable the
use_razor2 1 in my config, I get a warning when I lint/debug that it
failed to parse the line. I have this same problem with DCC, which is
mouss wrote:
Edward Diener a écrit :
Does anybody know the instructions for training SA with the contents of
the Thunderbird Junk folder ?
My web host, where SA is tunning, suggests I do this in order to reduce
the amount of spam I get, and I can login to my web host, transfer files
from my
Num ber wrote:
the last question,
What rules i need to take ? all ? or only somes (but what ...)
Nobody ??
I answered your question the first time you asked...
They have to many rules on the SARE website...
And i don't know what rules i need to take .. ALL ?
There are only 21 SARE rule
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Wess wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use Razor2 with Spamassassin 3 on Gentoo. I have
Razor2 installed, but Spamassassin will not use it. If I enable the
use_razor2 1 in my config, I get a warning when I lint/debug that
it failed to parse the line. I have this same
JuNiOx wrote:
right... i saw something about that..
but... in my spamassassin there isnt whitelist or blacklist
how do i create them?
- Original Message -
From: JamesDR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: its not spam
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 09:26:25AM +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
As I use SPF on MTA level, I wanted to disable SPF. So I have to disable
the SPF list from RDJ also, thank you.
FWIW, rules that require plugins should be wrapped in ifplugin/endif
containers. Especially if those rules are
I believe i am having an issue with my trusted networks and am hoping
someone can help me figure out what to do. I currently do not have any
defined and am running a nat'ed server which from what i read will
pretty much always have problems with trusted networks. The thing is,
im not
Jim Maul wrote:
I believe i am having an issue with my trusted networks and am hoping
someone can help me figure out what to do. I currently do not have
any defined and am running a nat'ed server which from what i read will
pretty much always have problems with trusted networks. The thing
Bowie Bailey wrote:
My question is, with this setup, what trusted_networks should i have
defined?
You should define all of the IP addresses of your mailserver.
trusted_networks 192.168.128.4
trusted_networks 69.27.243.222
I see that 167.206.112.76 (mx1.lightpath.net) also accepts mail for
Mike Pepe wrote:
If your mail server and users are using IMAP, the Junk E-mail folder
is on the server already.
I've got a script that runs from cron that will learn from that folder
and then delete its contents several times a day.
My issue is when spam is missed, I'd like to J it so it
Larry wrote:
Can I blacklist a domain but make an exception for one person in that
domain?
Like;
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the exception of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] won't blacklist [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now blacklist_from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JuNiOx wrote:
hi all
my spamassassin is adding *SPAM* in some messages witch
isnt one!!
how can i fix it?
i would like configure to say it: hei, the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not spam, stop to change its subject
=)
Jim Maul wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
My question is, with this setup, what trusted_networks should i have
defined?
You should define all of the IP addresses of your mailserver.
trusted_networks 192.168.128.4
trusted_networks 69.27.243.222
I see that 167.206.112.76 (mx1.lightpath.net) also
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
You might as well through in trusted_networks 127.0.0.1
... that's not hardcoded?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
You might as well through in trusted_networks 127.0.0.1
... that's not hardcoded?
When automatically set, yes. When you manually define your
trusted/internal networks, no -- you really get to define them.
Craig McLean wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
[snip]
You should define all of the IP addresses of your mailserver.
trusted_networks 192.168.128.4
trusted_networks 69.27.243.222
(I'm not the OP...)
Do those addresses need to be CIDR? Or will SA take straight-out IP?
Not a
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
When automatically set, yes. When you manually define your
trusted/internal networks, no -- you really get to define them.
OK, that makes sense.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Craig McLean wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
[snip]
You should define all of the IP addresses of your mailserver.
trusted_networks 192.168.128.4
trusted_networks 69.27.243.222
(I'm not the OP...)
Do those addresses need to be CIDR? Or will SA take straight-out IP?
Not a
Gestern (24.03.2006/22:43 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler,
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Craig McLean wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
[snip]
You should define all of the IP addresses of your mailserver.
I don`t know yet how I must determine the trusted network. :(
192.168.1/24 127/8 is clear for me. Right?
I sat up and read till about 1:00 this morning all about training
the bayesin filter. I have a question.
Should I turn spamassassin off while I collect a load of spam so when I
train the filter it doesn't have the spamassassin markup in it??
I wouldn't think you should train the filter with
Abel Jeffcoat wrote:
All,
I have gotten a couple of replies, (thank you) but I thought I could be
more clear.
I'm looking for a tool that will all users to adminstor their blacklist
and/or whitelist. I use Qmail and have mail delivered to a Spam folder.
I would like my users to be able to
Larry wrote:
I sat up and read till about 1:00 this morning all about training
the bayesin filter. I have a question.
Should I turn spamassassin off while I collect a load of spam so when
I train the filter it doesn't have the spamassassin markup in it??
I wouldn't think you should train
Larry wrote:
I sat up and read till about 1:00 this morning all about training
the bayesin filter. I have a question.
Should I turn spamassassin off while I collect a load of spam so when I
train the filter it doesn't have the spamassassin markup in it??
I wouldn't think you should train the
Jim Knuth wrote:
Gestern (24.03.2006/22:43 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler,
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Craig McLean wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
[snip]
You should define all of the IP addresses of your mailserver.
I don`t know yet how I must determine the trusted network. :(
192.168.1/24 127/8 is
I was looking at IP::Country and trying to figure out how it works
and how it's packaged...
Noticed that the code and data are both part of the same tarball or
RPM... That's unfortunate. I suspect the data changes more often
than the code. In fact, it would be nice if the data were cached on
a
Hello Everyone,
I've been under a spam storm for the last two days and most of the
message I get are similar to the one below, message for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I really don't understand how come I'm receiving
such messages! Can someone help me prevent these messages?
Return-Path:
Received: from
Yousef Raffah wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've been under a spam storm for the last two days and most of the
message I get are similar to the one below, message for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I really don't understand how come I'm receiving
such messages! Can someone help me prevent these messages?
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 01:09 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Yousef Raffah wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've been under a spam storm for the last two days and most of the
message I get are similar to the one below, message for
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I really don't understand how come I'm receiving
55 matches
Mail list logo