Sure is a stock spam rule set.
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_stocks.cf
Had it running 10 minutes after it was announced. My problem is worse
than that. Possibly I could create a meta rule in my local.cf that says
a sare_stock hit plus any other rule, add 5 points.
If it
time to try them again. SpamCop, I won't go there, we have issues with
the people at SpamCop. I neither use them nor trust them.
You REALLY need to try URIBL, and probably uriblack, and a few more of the
URI based lists. These get feeds from SpamCop and the like. But they work.
Loren
On Thursday June 1 2006 04:05, Matt Kettler wrote:
Simple rule:
trusted_networks - set to cover all machines that might generate a
Received: header that you control.
internal_networks - Will default to match trusted_networks if not declared.
99% of the time, you just set trusted_networks.
Nels Lindquist wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 10:04:54 -0600:
I removed the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001002
directory which was blank
It shouldn't exist after an install and if you ran sa-update it should
have content. Maybe an sa-update that got interrupted?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 19:37:54 -0400 (EDT):
some
under the 5.6.1 site_perl, some under 5.005.
Did you notice that you didn't say anything about this earlier? ;-) It
seems this is the cause of your problem.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet
I apologize in advance for making a lazy question, but is there a quick
guide somewhere as to how to integrate Spam Assassin with an exchange
server? Or maybe some way to set it in a way it will get the mails before,
filter and then forward them to exchange unchanged?.
Thanks a lot in advance.
I use a dedicated SMTP gateway running RH EL3 sendmail + SpamAssassin + ClamAV
to virus and spam check my e-mail before it goes into Exchange.
This should be fairly easy to set up as spamassassin is run without user
preferences and only uses local configuration. You might need to change MX
Crespillo, Matias wrote:
I apologize in advance for making a lazy question, but is there a quick
guide somewhere as to how to integrate Spam Assassin with an exchange
server? Or maybe some way to set it in a way it will get the mails before,
filter and then forward them to exchange unchanged?.
Mark Martinec wrote:
On Thursday June 1 2006 04:05, Matt Kettler wrote:
Simple rule:
trusted_networks - set to cover all machines that might generate a
Received: header that you control.
internal_networks - Will default to match trusted_networks if not
declared.
99% of the time,
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Nels Lindquist wrote on Wed, 31 May 2006 10:04:54 -0600:
I removed the /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001002
directory which was blank
It shouldn't exist after an install and if you ran sa-update it should
have content. Maybe an sa-update that got interrupted?
I have two
I definitely did not see an approval request. And I can now confirm
that there are some people who are trying to opt out of the list saying
they did not subscribe. I already have sent postmaster but I am not
optimistic.
Tom
Benny Pedersen wrote:
I have included the mailing in
DAve wrote:
Howdy,
My users are just about tired of the stock spams, we are getting many
now that are barely hitting any stock rules at all. The funny thing is
they are pretty much a legit email. No obfuscation, no funky headers, no
URL.
I am nearly ready to just stomp any and all stock
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:23:23 -0400, Theo Van Dinter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:07:26PM +0100, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
If you find way of load balancing the MySQL db's I'd be very
interested in hearing how.
I'm not a DBA, but doesn't MySQL support clustering which would
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
This may be a daft question, if so, apologies in advance; but, do you
train these spam into sa?
Nope, been down the Bayes road a few times and the load on the server
never justified the spam it caught. When using bayes we always end up
babysitting it too much. This
DAve wrote:
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
This may be a daft question, if so, apologies in advance; but, do you
train these spam into sa?
Nope, been down the Bayes road a few times and the load on the server
never justified the spam it caught. When using bayes we always end up
babysitting it too
Bayes is a stalwart here, that and the more recent versions of SA.
Best I can suggest is upgrade to 3.1.1 and run in some rules, I'm
happy to let you know which ones we use.
That being said, bayes is the only realistic way of training in spam -
adding it makes life a lot easier.
HTH
Kind
Bowie,
it is imperative than MSA hosts are excluded from
internal_networks.
What do you do if SA is running on your MSA host?
I believe this is the only exception to the rule,
because the following probably takes precedence:
The machine you're scanning on should be internal trusted
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 02:53:56PM -0400, DAve wrote:
Theo, I appreciate the results, that means more to me than upgrade.
Results speak louder than anything else. Could you tell me the scores
for each test? If you are as busy as I am, I understand if you can not
Not off hand, but they're
From: Dallas L. Engelken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
Dallas L. Engelken writes:
for those that didn't see it, http://slashdot.org/ read Google,
Submission AdSense and NoFollow Letdown. figured I'd
toot his
From: Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Justin Mason wrote:
Dallas L. Engelken writes:
for those that didn't see it, http://slashdot.org/
read Google,
Submission
On Thursday June 1 2006 20:53, DAve wrote:
Bayes, arrgg!! More than once I've been given examples of bayes being
the solution I need. I really really really want bayes to work. But each
time I set it up, the db gets huge, scan times go through the roof, and
I end up disappointed.
I currently
I'm thinking about using MyDNS to create my own DNS blacklist. I'm
thinking I'll make it available to everyone to list IPs that are not on
other lists. Mostly virus infected zombies and such.
So - has anyone else done this? Looking for some pointers. I'm running
Exim and wanting to have Exim
Just a quick note that 70_sare_html0.cf has been updated. A few
obsolete rules (no longer hit any ham) have been removed, and one rule
added.
It'll take a little while longer for me to update the rest of the
70_sare_html*.cf files, and therefore 70_sare_html.cf ... if you don't
want to wait for
23 matches
Mail list logo
