Wayne,
Pro bono, here's the way to get SmarterMail to bypass SpamAssassin for
authenticated users.
BACKGROUND after playing around with SM for a few minutes
--
Like many/most MTAs, SM writes two spool files for every e-mail. One
is the message header/body, the other is the
WFGB Team wrote on Sat, 3 Jun 2006 23:22:07 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time):
PLEASE STOP SENDING PICTURES AND HTML TO THE LIST.
0.8 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry
0.1 HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY BODY: HTML has tbody tag
1.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Thursday, June 01, 2006 1:41 PM -0400 DAve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently 3.0.4 on the toasters, 3.0.2 on the MailScanner boxes. These
may or may not get updates this month. I've never been fond of update
as a solution to a problem unless I know the change in
Thank you everyone for your quotes, efforts and time involved. We actually
have this issue resolved now. Created a batch to interface in with
Smartermail to bypass the SA checking.
Wayne
--
View this message in context:
I updated from 3.0.2 to 3.1.1 (I also tried 3.1.2) and I'm now seeing
blank lines (3 of them!) inserted after the X-Spam-Status: header.
Has anyone else seen this?
I can reproduce the problem easily on the command line simply by
piping a message to the spamassassin command.
I have a feeling
Yes, we have someone looking into that this Wednesday to give us a quote on that. However the original issue was SPAM assassin detecting our own emails as SPAM. That issue has been resolved and thereforeclosingout the thread.
Wayne
---Original Message---
From: Peter P. Benac
Heute (04.06.2006/19:35 Uhr) schrieb WFGB Team,
Yes, we have someone looking into that this Wednesday to give us a quote on
that. However the original issue was SPAM assassin detecting our own emails
as SPAM. That issue has been resolved and therefore closing out the thread.
Wayne
The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any other way. There is nothing I can do about that.
Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the emails that were sent before??
Do I have control over where they post to?
How do I control that?
Wayne
At 11:43 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any
other way. There is nothing I can do about that.
Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the
emails that were sent before??
Do I have control over where they post to?
How
Heute (04.06.2006/20:43 Uhr) schrieb WFGB Team,
The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any other way.
There is nothing I can do about that.
Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the emails
that were sent before??
Do I have control over where
WFGB Team schreef:
Hi,
Please reread some of the comments you got. Your mails are delivered to
other mail servers. These servers may also employ SpamAssassin. If your
mails were being stopped or flagged on their way out by your own setup,
think about their fate on the other side...
On 4 Jun 2006, at 18:35, WFGB Team wrote:
Yes, we have someone looking into that this Wednesday to give us a
quote on that. However the original issue was SPAM assassin
detecting our own emails as SPAM. That issue has been resolved and
therefore closing out the thread.
All uppercase
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
IDEA how much I despise those incredimail smilies and the trash
they usually accompany.
{+_+}
- Original Message -
From: WFGB Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And YOU are trying to be a system administrator, Wayne?
Give me a BREAK!
{+_+}
- Original Message -
From: WFGB Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Peter P. Benac [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 11:43
Subject: Re:
From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 11:43 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any
other way. There is nothing I can do about that.
Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the
emails that were sent before??
Do I have
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
IDEA how much I despise those incredimail smilies and the trash
they usually accompany.
{+_+}
That's why I love Pine. Strictly
Heute (05.06.2006/02:42 Uhr) schrieb jdow,
And YOU are trying to be a system administrator, Wayne?
Give me a BREAK!
{+_+}
You are right @jdow - LOL
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
--
Zufalls-Zitat
--
Man umgebe mich mit Luxus.
Heute (05.06.2006/02:52 Uhr) schrieb Duane Hill,
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
IDEA how much I despise those incredimail smilies and the trash
they usually
I have had a problem with a particular form of received header not being
parsed correctly because it is malformed. I had a brief conversation on this
list about a year ago with a glimmer of hope that in future versions this
would be overcome. However a year later these emails are still being
From: Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
IDEA how much I despise those incredimail smilies and the trash
they usually accompany.
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
From: Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote:
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the
cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO
IDEA how much I despise those incredimail smilies and the
On 6/4/2006 9:54 PM, Ben Wylie wrote:
I have had a problem with a particular form of received header not being
parsed correctly because it is malformed. I had a brief conversation on this
list about a year ago with a glimmer of hope that in future versions this
would be overcome. However a year
At 05:43 PM 6/4/2006, you wrote:
Top Posting is putting the textAnd fubars who complain
of your reply above the quoted text. excessively about top posting
Bottom posting (as I am doing) is get replies that are side
putting your reply below the original posted.
Current versions of SpamAssassin won't fire ALL_TRUSTED if it can't
parse all of the received headers.
Since you provided no current debug info, or even said what version you
are using, I can only guess at what you're problem might be. Are you
sure it's not parsing the header and isn't
On 6/4/2006 11:28 PM, Ben Wylie wrote:
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by arkbb.co.uk with SMTP (HELO server.)
(ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.8.2)); Mon,
5 Jun 2006 03:48:52 +0100
Received: (from localhost [24.180.47.240])
by server. (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id
25 matches
Mail list logo
