Jim C. Nasby wrote:
Having said all that; it's nearly impossible to get a general-purpose RDBMS
to outperform an optimized storage format
Indeed. I refer back to the wondrous success Microsoft Exchange has had.
It *isn't* SQL. It's a hand-crafted, JET-backend specifically written to
be
Thomas Schlosser wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:08:42 +0200:
Jun 10 20:00:02 homesrv spamd[7041]: mkdir /root/.spamassassin:
My spamd was started with
/usr/bin/spamd --daemonize --username spamfilt
This user isn't allowed to write to /root, but you got a mail for root ...
At least that's
Started noticing the system flagging spam emails but not deleting them:
Jun 11 07:37:13 pinot postfix/smtpd[8568]: connect from unknown[160.79.37.83]
Jun 11 07:37:14 pinot postfix/smtpd[8568]: 9F6CBE88001:
client=unknown[160.79.37.83]
Jun 11 07:37:16 pinot postfix/cleanup[11935]: 9F6CBE88001:
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 10:08 -0400, L. Mark Stone wrote:
Started noticing the system flagging spam emails but not deleting them:
[cut]
Jun 11 07:37:18 pinot amavis[10738]: (10738-04) spam_scan: hits=24.677
I have SpamAssassin install with Perl 5.8.8 on a W2K3 box.
SA is the latest version.
I would like to setup the following
I need to know how to setup wrongmx.pm and wrongmx.cf so that email that does not go to my spam filter first will be deleted. I also want to do this for only one domain on my
Mike L wrote:
I have SpamAssassin install with Perl 5.8.8 on a W2K3 box.
SA is the latest version.
I would like to setup the following
I need to know how to setup wrongmx.pm http://wrongmx.pm and
wrongmx.cf http://wrongmx.cf so that email that does not go to my spam
filter first will be
How do I stop spamassassin from scanning outbound emails?
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:40PM -0400, Mike L wrote:
How do I stop spamassassin from scanning outbound emails?
You'll have to have whatever is calling SA (presumably a milter) stop calling
for locally generated mails.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
If you're not the lead dog, everything
Given the configuration, I would have expected the message to have
been discarded. What did I miss?
By any chance did you accidentally set $final_spam_destiny to D_PASS in
the config file? There's a line that does this, but it's commented out
by default.
-Bill
Yes, discarding is
Not really. I have no idea how you've got your SA setup on Windows and
you haven't asked anything specific.
Daryl
On 6/11/2006 1:57 PM, Mike L wrote:
Thanks Daryl, but can you give me a little more info?
On 6/11/06, *Daryl C. W. O'Shea* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, discarding is not only controlled by $sa_kill_level_deflt by also by
$final_spam_desiny and whether a quarantine is configured or not, and if
quarantine is configured, then also $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level. This is
not a SpamAssassin question, it is an amavisd-new question.
Having said
Hi Mike!
On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Mike L wrote:
How do I stop spamassassin from scanning outbound emails?
On my system I have 2 copies of Posfix running (in and out). This allows
me to have seperate settings for inbound and outbound mails.
Regards,
Chris
--
/* _\|/_
(o o)
Yeah, put the plugin files in your local config directory... that's the
same directory that has you local.cf file.
If you want to only enable the WRONG_MX rule for a particular domain,
you'll have to configure per user or domain scoring.
None of this is specific to this particular plugin.
Quoting Bill Randle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 10:08 -0400, L. Mark Stone wrote:
Started noticing the system flagging spam emails but not deleting them:
[cut]
Jun 11 07:37:18 pinot amavis[10738]: (10738-04) spam_scan: hits=24.677
Hi, I have Postfix 2.2.4, Procmail 3.2.2, Perl 5.8.7, and Spamassassin 3.0.4
. Various files look like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l ~/.forward ~/.procmailrc
4.0K -rw-r--r-- 1 eben eben 35 2006-06-10 19:06 /home/eben/.forward
4.0K -rw-r--r-- 1 eben eben 1.2K 2006-02-02 01:31
David Flanigan wrote:
Jun 8 10:13:56 ns1 sendmail[20493]: k58EDuQQ020493: [EMAIL PROTECTED]...
User unknown
Jun 8 10:13:56 ns1 sendmail[20493]: k58EDuQQ020493: from=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
size=15866, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=ns2.flanigan.net
[67.36.126.141]
Jun 8
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was using 3.1.0 until today on my mail server at work and after the
upgrade suddenly I'm seeing a lot of RCVD_IN_WHOIS_BOGONS misfiring.
one example of a sender domain that triggered is d.dena.ne.jp which
doesn't directly resolve, but ns.dena.ne.jp
Hi, I have Postfix 2.2.4, Procmail 3.2.2, Perl 5.8.7, and Spamassassin
3.0.4 . Various files look like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -l ~/.forward ~/.procmailrc
4.0K -rw-r--r-- 1 eben eben 35 2006-06-10 19:06 /home/eben/.forward
4.0K -rw-r--r-- 1 eben eben 1.2K 2006-02-02 01:31
I have just noticed the same thing.
Increase in false positives due to that rule telling me the upstream
mail server addresses (which I don't control) have been listed in
combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com.
Which is not right for any reason - they ought not be there. Looking
19 matches
Mail list logo
