Re: The best way to use Spamassassin is to not use Spamassassin

Bart Schaefer wrote: On 7/12/06, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bart Schaefer wrote: There's been a fellow over on the procmail list claiming for well over a year now that he can get better accuracy than SA through message header analysis alone His claim might well be true. Oh, I

Re: body speedups using new features in perl 5.9.x

David Landgren wrote: [...] % perl5.9.4 racmp host.1k assembled 4145 patterns in 3.83324813842773 seconds R::A: good = 971, bad = 29 in 0.0148990154266357 seconds list: good = 971, bad = 29 in 5.72843599319458 seconds A_C: good = 971, bad = 29 in 8.56000709533691 seconds RA len: 87491 A_C

Re: sa-learn slow with Bayes and PostgreSQL

Hi Michael, everyone, Michael Parker wrote: I notice that using sa-learn with SQL now is very slow compared to file db. Is this normal, and is accessing the db while scanning mail any slower with SQL? Yes. Check out the benchmarks here:

BAYES_99 makes lots of false-positive

Hello folks, My users speak Chinese. I found that spamassassin seems not working well about chinese chset (utf8 or big5) on the bayes issue. Many normal mails (almost) get BAYES_99 score although the real spam also get BAYES_99. It looks like foreign language like Chinese is very easy to be high

Re: Abuse of SARE whitelist

Hi everyone, Paul Boven wrote: One of my users just spotted a FN that had managed to slip trough. They're abusing 70_sare_whitelist.cf, specifically: whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] vonage.com # Vonage voice mail notification I'm now catching these on several

No dns lookup in received header for trusted

Hello, I have a problem with my trusted network config. An email with the following header received line does not work with trusted network. --- Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.romeo.unige.ch by romeo.unige.ch (PMDF V6.2-1x9 #31144) id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 17:10:03 +0200

SA RPMs for Suse 10.0?

I have a Suse 10.0 system running Spamassassin from the Suse RPMs that used to be on Carsten Hoegers Suse FTP folder. They don't appear to be there any more, so I wondered if anyone had any pointers to compatible RPMs to get me up to 3.1.3? I know I could uninstall the existing Spamassassin RPMs

Re: The best way to use Spamassassin is to not use Spamassassin

* Marc Perkel wrote (12/07/06 18:30): Catchy subject line eh? OK - so what I mean by this is that I now use SA for about 5% of all incoming email. The reaso of spam is rejected before I get to SA through a fairly large number of tricks that allow me to determine with near 100% accuracy

Re: Abuse of SARE whitelist

Hi Justin, everyone, Justin Mason wrote: It's worth checking this; that rule should fire only if the mail really *did* come from Vonage. I suspect a bug in how your mailserver's Received headers are parsed. Could you post: - a sample of a spam that passed this, with all headers - output

Re: Abuse of SARE whitelist

ok -- there's the bug ;) SpamAssassin is misinterpreting your MX's Received headers. Received: from vm.vonage.com ([220.166.39.177]) by amsfep14-int.chello.nl (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with SMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED] for [EMAIL PROTECTED];

Re: mangled uris

Ramprasad wrote: Spamassassin works pretty great for me, but some spammers keep upgrading. Some of my clients are still getting stupid spams thru I think this was discussed before how do I catch spam with mangled urls. Sorry if this is a repeat Something like -- visit

modifying log

hi Where is the module of logging in spamd? I want to add $from and $to to logging? which file, and which part must be changed?Best pezhman Lali Talk is cheap. Use Yahoo! Messenger to make PC-to-Phone calls. Great rates starting at 1¢/min.

$from and $to

Hi which variables in spamd, contained "from" and "to" of the processed mail? if nothing, how can I add this variables?Best Pezhman How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Re: Problems on rethad 9.0

On Wed, July 12, 2006 11:53, Tom Brown wrote: Im working in rethad 9.0 and try to install spamassassin in a good way why redhat 9? why redhat at all ? :-) How can i fix this problem? use a more upto date OS ?? 70 million people still use windows 98, now microsoft stops supporting secuirity

Spamassassin for web input forms ?

Hi, i have an idea to use spamassassin for checking web inputs forms. But i wanna different spam database from mail spam database on the same machine. I think that i can send web form to some e-mail address, if spamassassin say thats ok, send it to another e-mail address and theris some

Re: Image only spam

- Original Message - From: Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Spamass users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM Subject: Re: Image only spam Jack Gostl wrote: Thanks for the response. Take it slow with me, spamassassin has been running so well for so

Re: The best way to use Spamassassin is to not use Spamassassin

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006, Marc Perkel wrote: Depends on what he's doing it might work. I catch most spam based on sender behavior rather than message content. For example, anyone can do this trick. Set your highest MX record (add a new one) to an IP address that doesn't exist. Some spammers

Re: BAYES_99 makes lots of false-positive

Joshua, C.S. Chen wrote: Hello folks, My users speak Chinese. I found that spamassassin seems not working well about chinese chset (utf8 or big5) on the bayes issue. Many normal mails (almost) get BAYES_99 score although the real spam also get BAYES_99. It looks like foreign language like

Re: $from and $to

Pezhman Lali wrote: Hi which variables in spamd, contained from and to of the processed mail? if nothing, how can I add this variables? Which from and to are you referring to? The ones in the message body, or the actual ones from the envelope (ie: RCPT TO: and MAIL FROM commands)? If the

Re: SA RPMs for Suse 10.0?

Just d'l the source tar ball and build rpm's from it. /*rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.3.tar.gz* /That should produce a binary RPM for you. I have not tested it yet. Regards Mick Pollard __lunix-aus__/ / Paul Hutchings wrote: I have a Suse 10.0 system running Spamassassin from the Suse

Re: Image only spam

On Thursday July 13 2006 9:28 am, Jack Gostl wrote: - Original Message - From: Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Spamass users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM Subject: Re: Image only spam Jack Gostl wrote: Thanks for the response. Take it slow

Re: Abuse of SARE whitelist

On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Justin Mason wrote: ok -- there's the bug ;) SpamAssassin is misinterpreting your MX's Received headers. [...] Could you open a bug on the SpamAssassin bugzilla about that? Attach the debug output and sample again (it can be tricky to find posts to

dnsbl debugging

I am running SpamAssassin 3.1.2 on Windows 2003. I have had a problem with dnsbl lookups, as even though they complete, they do not return any results. It appears that only when i get a dns timeout that any that did complete and were positive are actually returned and score the email. I

Re: Spamassassin for web input forms ?

i have an idea to use spamassassin for checking web inputs forms. But i Ok. wanna different spam database from mail spam database on the same machine. Ok. I think that i can send web form to some e-mail address, if spamassassin say thats ok, send it to another e-mail address and theris

SPAMASSASSIN PER-USER AND QMAIL TOASTER

It is possible to configure preferences to per-user using mySQL and the Spamassassin, using the Qmail Toaster ? I am trying to make this, but I below receive the message from error: spamd: service unavailable: Error fetching to user preferences saw SQL at /usr/bin/spamd line 1684, line 2.

Re: Problems on rethad 9.0

Benny Pedersen wrote: the same was a fault from redhat to say we don't like to support older redhat relases, since we now need to donwload a iso file again to upgrade what could have being done from up2date ? You might find the following useful: HOWTO: yum upgrade to CentOS 4.0

Spamassassin for web input forms ?

Hi, i have an idea to use spamassassin for checking web inputs forms. But i wanna different spam database from mail spam database on the same machine. I think that i can send web form to some e-mail address, if spamassassin say thats ok, send it to another e-mail address and theris some

Re: Spamassassin for web input forms ?

Loren Wilton wrote: If this web form isn't high volume, you could format the form input as a mail message and pipe it to spamassassin, then check the result. Also, if the web form is written in Perl, you could access the SpamAssassin Perl modules directly. -- Kelson Vibber SpeedGate

RE: The best way to use Spamassassin is to not use Spamassassin

-Original Message- From: John D. Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 9:52 AM To: Marc Perkel Cc: Bart Schaefer; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: The best way to use Spamassassin is to not use Spamassassin doesn't work the skip it and

Re: Image only spam

Jack Gostl wrote: - Original Message - From: Steven Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Spamass users@spamassassin.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM Subject: Re: Image only spam Jack Gostl wrote: Thanks for the response. Take it slow with me, spamassassin has been