On Wednesday 14 February 2007, Ramprasad wrote:
>my MTA is configured to block domains listed in securitysage but I cant
>see any hits lately
>Is blackhole.securitysage.com down ??
>
>Thanks
>Ram
According to my procmail.log, its down.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense
my MTA is configured to block domains listed in securitysage but I cant
see any hits lately
Is blackhole.securitysage.com down ??
Thanks
Ram
Steve [Spamassassin] wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
>> could you post an example of your config and the message you're testing
>> with, in full?
> OK in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
> Received: by mail.mydomain.com (Postfix) id EFBE62E48F; Wed, 7 Feb
> 2007 12:57:43 + (GMT)
Nice.. A Re
What if you point directly to the .eml eg
Spamassassin -tD < /this/is/the/directory/samples/ocr-animated.eml
Just to be absolutely sure it is findingthe correct place??
Check permissions on the .eml, view it and see if it seems to have an
image inside
Just the usual I can suggest sorry
Kind Reg
Hi,
I have been looking (as I described earlier) for a way to use variables
in the rules for a few days without lucky.
I tried to hack SA, mix with plugins and got to the conclusion that the
only way to do this was to reevaluates the rules (REs) on every new
message, which is a huge draw back.
S
Dan wrote:
On Feb 13, 2007, at 13:41, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 19:57, Dan wrote:
I would like a Mail Transfer Agent recommendation. What's the best
MTA, running on any platform, that will accept two or more thresholds
(non-contiguous weight values) for treating mess
On Feb 13, 2007, at 13:41, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 19:57, Dan wrote:
I would like a Mail Transfer Agent recommendation. What's the best
MTA, running on any platform, that will accept two or more thresholds
(non-contiguous weight values) for treating messages as spam
Sorry... forgot to mention that it's seeing incoming message and is listing
messageids, senders, and recipients for those. I don't think it's
successfully run FuzzyOcr on any of them yet, though.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 20
I've just tried it with an actual spam message that I've extracted from my
own mailbox. The message has a normal looking message id, but it still says
no messageid/sender/recipient.
--Steve
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:
Yes, it has the message Id that you gave. Line wraps look OK. Maybe I'll try
and get a hold of my own test message. I get plenty of image spam.
--Steve
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 5:38 PM
To: Steve Pfister
Cc: users@spam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> I believe there a way to use sa-update to get the SARE rules from
> saupdates.openprotect.com.
There's a good guide here: http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-
sa-update-howto.txt
HTH
-- A.
Interesting. What's odd is that FuzzyOCR calls it has having no messageid.
Does any other part of the debug output indicate SA understands the
message id/sender/recipients?
Does the file itself contain a message-id header?
ie: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Do the line-wraps look right, or ar
Sorry... I guess I wasn't clear. I'm running:
Spamassassin -tD < ocr-animated.eml
In the samples directory of FuzzyOcr-3.5.1.
It's saying there's no image files found.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 4:41 PM
To: Steve Pfis
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 19:57, Dan wrote:
> I would like a Mail Transfer Agent recommendation. What's the best
> MTA, running on any platform, that will accept two or more thresholds
> (non-contiguous weight values) for treating messages as spam?
> Something like:
>
> 0-1 is ham
>
>
Steve Pfister wrote:
>
> I’m trying to install FuzzyOcr 3.51 (with patches for < 10.34 netpbm)
> on RedHat Linux 9 with Spamassassin 3.1.7. I’m trying to test it out
> with the samples images, but I keep getting:
>
>
>
> [25404] dbg: FuzzyOcr: Starting FuzzyOcr...
>
> [25404] info: FuzzyOcr: Proc
Joe Zitnik wrote:
> How would I whitelist mail from a listserv? Since the mail is shown
> to be from the user who sent it and not the listserv, I can't do a
> whitelist_from. Would it be easier to make a rule to look for the
> listserv domain in the header? How would I make a rule to look for
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 February 2007 15:56
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> sa-update updates the stock rules that are distributed with
> SA. Rules Du Jour is used to update add-on rulesets like the
> SARE rules.
>
> If you are not r
Dan wrote:
I would like a Mail Transfer Agent recommendation. What's the best MTA,
running on any platform, that will accept two or more thresholds
(non-contiguous weight values) for treating messages as spam? Something
like:
...
Where 4 paths are possible, instead of the normal 2 (below 10
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:57:44AM -0800, Dan wrote:
> I would like a Mail Transfer Agent recommendation. What's the best
> MTA, running on any platform, that will accept two or more thresholds
> (non-contiguous weight values) for treating messages as spam?
MTAs don't care about ham or spa
Hello,
I would like a Mail Transfer Agent recommendation. What's the best
MTA, running on any platform, that will accept two or more thresholds
(non-contiguous weight values) for treating messages as spam?
Something like:
0-1 is ham
2-9 is spam
10 is ham
I'm trying to install FuzzyOcr 3.51 (with patches for < 10.34 netpbm) on
RedHat Linux 9 with Spamassassin 3.1.7. I'm trying to test it out with the
samples images, but I keep getting:
[25404] dbg: FuzzyOcr: Starting FuzzyOcr...
[25404] info: FuzzyOcr: Processing Message with ID "" ( -> )
[254
Tirsdag 13 februar 2007 19:15, skrev Theo Van Dinter:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:37:23PM +0100, Dag Ringdal wrote:
> > I care about the rules as well. Where can I find whether the lastest
> > rules is updated and in use?
> >
> > [25234] dbg: dns: query failed: 7.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org => NO
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 06:37:23PM +0100, Dag Ringdal wrote:
> I care about the rules as well. Where can I find whether the lastest rules is
> updated and in use?
>
> [25234] dbg: dns: query failed: 7.1.3.updates.spamassassin.org => NOERROR
In your case, you got a DNS error... I'd get that prob
Tirsdag 13 februar 2007 16:30, skrev Theo Van Dinter:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:48:02PM +0100, Dag Ringdal wrote:
> > 3.1.7 and are doing sa-update from time to time, but I'm not assured that
> > the latest version is installed. When I type sa-update -V, I get:
> > sa-update version svn454083
>
On 13-Feb-2007, at 09:08, Alexis Manning wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
Am I worrying over nothing? I do seem to get spam only on those
accounts for which greylisting is inactive, but on those I get a LOT
that SA fails to tag, including just about every one of those image
spams with the 2K or
On 13-Feb-2007, at 08:39, Chris St. Pierre wrote:
This is where a user feedback look -- such as spam/ham reporting links
in your webmail client, or the equivalent training for desktop client
users -- can be really useful.
Ideally I'd like to have per-user bayes, but some of my users are
manag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Am I worrying over nothing? I do seem to get spam only on those
> accounts for which greylisting is inactive, but on those I get a LOT
> that SA fails to tag, including just about every one of those image
> spams with the 2K or so of seemingly randomish text in th
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
The other thing to do is to run sa-update to make sure you
are running the latest versions of the standard SA rules.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-update.html
I already use rules_du_jour.. It's OK? Or I can obtain further
improvement using sa-update?
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, LuKreme wrote:
Now, perhaps I am misunderstanding, but BAYES_99 is hitting on 5% of ham? and
AWL on 35% of spam?
Keep in mind that AWL is slightly misnamed; it doesn't just whitelist,
it adjusts scores (both positively and negatively) based on previous
history. So the fac
I recently ran sa-stats (Dallas's script, not the one in SA)
Email:10373 Autolearn: 1575 AvgScore: 7.45 AvgScanTime:
3.74 sec
Spam: 6179 Autolearn: 680 AvgScore: 12.44 AvgScanTime:
4.03 sec
Ham: 4194 Autolearn: 895 AvgScore: 0.10 AvgScanTime:
3.33 sec
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 03:48:02PM +0100, Dag Ringdal wrote:
> 3.1.7 and are doing sa-update from time to time, but I'm not assured that the
> latest version is installed. When I type sa-update -V, I get:
> sa-update version svn454083
> running on Perl version 5.8.8
> How can I know this is the
on my system, and can therfore not find the latest config files. I run SA
3.1.7 and are doing sa-update from time to time, but I'm not assured that the
latest version is installed. When I type sa-update -V, I get:
sa-update version svn454083
running on Perl version 5.8.8
How can I know this is
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 7:42 am, Mark Martinec wrote:
>
> > I notice that several of my hourly logcheck messages are missing from a
> > certain time period forward, also in my spam folder one message is
> > repeated multiple times. Looking in my earthlink webmail folder I see
> > that same mes
Justin Mason wrote:
could you post an example of your config and the message you're testing
with, in full?
OK in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
--
allow_user_rules 1
bayes_auto_expire 0
whitelist_bounce_relays mail.mydomain.com
--
A bounce message which should have been whitelisted:
c
Hi Ron and Dan
I have the same issues. Have you resolved this problem? If you did, and
have a solutions, could you please help me out with it?
Thank you in advance
more detail below.
JT
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt3660MmjhEvYg2f34OAemlKwfim1hp8BGs=
Received: from bay0-omc3-s19.bay0.hotmail.com (
> The other thing to do is to run sa-update to make sure you
> are running the latest versions of the standard SA rules.
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-update.html
I already use rules_du_jour.. It's OK? Or I can obtain further
improvement using sa-update?
rocsca
Chris,
> Feb 13 03:07:31 localhost spamd[15060]: dkim: lookup failed: DNS query
> timeout for _policy._domainkey.littlepinkeggs.com
DNS setup of domain littlepinkeggs.com is terribly broken,
they have no name servers, and even whois gets stuck on them.
The response from dkim plugin is normal.
>
Steve [Spamassassin] writes:
> I've been trying to use the Vbounce ruleset
> [http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/VBounceRuleset] on spamassassin 3.1.4.
>
> I'm unable to get whitelist_bounce_relays to work... When I
> intentionally send an email to a non-existent remote address I get a
> boun
The whole error shown is:
Feb 13 03:07:31 localhost spamd[15060]: dkim: lookup failed: DNS query timeout
for _policy._domainkey.littlepinkeggs.com
I notice that several of my hourly logcheck messages are missing from a
certain time period forward, also in my spam folder one message is repeated
I've been trying to use the Vbounce ruleset
[http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/VBounceRuleset] on spamassassin 3.1.4.
I'm unable to get whitelist_bounce_relays to work... When I
intentionally send an email to a non-existent remote address I get a
bounce message marked exactly as if it had be
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Your network tests are still not working. Run spamassassin
-D again to make sure the Net::DNS installation is being used by SA.
Infact, I'm tryng to install it cos it is not installed..
I have succeded..
Attached there is the output of spamassassin -D before and after
Hi
> How would I whitelist mail from a listserv? Since the mail is shown to
> be from the user who sent it and not the listserv, I can't do a
> whitelist_from. Would it be easier to make a rule to look for the
> listserv domain in the header? How would I make a rule to look for just
> a word in
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Your network tests are still not working. Run spamassassin
-D again to make sure the Net::DNS installation is being used by SA.
Infact, I'm tryng to install it cos it is not installed..
I have succeded..
Attached there is the output of spamassassin -D before and
How would I whitelist mail from a listserv? Since the mail is shown to
be from the user who sent it and not the listserv, I can't do a
whitelist_from. Would it be easier to make a rule to look for the
listserv domain in the header? How would I make a rule to look for just
a word in the header, r
Hi,
Keep replies on the list.
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
[30482] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
[30482] dbg: dns: is DNS available? 0
Ive installed Net::DNS::Resolver. DNS server is local.
And have you run spamassassin -D to make sure it is picking it up correctly?
Steve Monkhouse wrote:
Yeah that works for that one.. but with multiple originating sources and
multiple carriers etc I thought there must be a better way than manually
enetering every mms provider... ??
I'm old fashioned and don't own an MMS-enabled phone, but phone numbers
are generally 12 n
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
I think the next thing you need to do is run the command with
the -D switch.
The output is attached..
There are a few problems that jump out at me here, I am sure others will
pick up on any I have missed:
1.
[30482] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver availabl
> I think the next thing you need to do is run the command with
> the -D switch.
The output is attached..
> It doesn't look like you are running any network tests, you
> are certainly not running any Bayes tests.
I have executed the command you've sayed me after lauching spamd..
> Can you rem
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
If you have the email saved in a text file called email.txt,
run this command making sure that you are logged in as the
user who spamd run as.
spamassassin -t < email.txt
If you want a lot more information you can use the debug switch
spamassassin -D -t < email.t
> If you have the email saved in a text file called email.txt,
> run this command making sure that you are logged in as the
> user who spamd run as.
>
> spamassassin -t < email.txt
>
> If you want a lot more information you can use the debug switch
>
> spamassassin -D -t < email.txt
Thanks.
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Can you so us which tests these emails hit on your system?
Please tell me how I have to do..
If you have the email saved in a text file called email.txt, run this
command making sure that you are logged in as the user who spamd run as.
spamassassin -t < email.txt
I
> Can you so us which tests these emails hit on your system?
Please tell me how I have to do..
rocsca
> Enable network tests. You may have to set up several things
> correctly to get this to work, but just removing "-L" from
> the spamd startup line may be enough as a start.
I don' understand.. If I have a message in mbox format, what I have to
do so that I can see what score SA should assign
> > Put a full email (including all headers) on a web page somewhere.
>
> http://www.rocsca.it/it_by_confocal.out
>
> That's not a drug spam, that's a stock spam. It just happens
> to be for a pharmacutical company.
Sorry! I'm not very experienced with the kinds of spam..
I'ld very to learn t
54 matches
Mail list logo
