Warnings after upgrade

Hi. Gentoo Spamassassin 3.1.8-r1 After upgrading from 3.1.3 to 3.1.8-r1 I found many warnings in logs (see attachment) which fill up all space on my /var/log partition. This warings is equal to warnings from "spamd -D". Also I attach versions of my perl modules. May be it will be usefull. Any

Re: Spamassassin 3.2.0

On Sat, 19 May 2007, Ming Hou wrote: > My issue Mail::DKIM and Mail::DomainKeys are required Crypt::OpenSSL::Random > and Crypt::OpenSSL::RSA. But, I could not get Crypt::OpenSSL::Random to be > built successfully because it always complained the following messages: > > Note (probably harmless):

Re: Two directorys of spamassassin

night duke wrote: ls -al /etc drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2007-05-20 17:48 spamassassin cd etc/mail ls -al lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2007-04-09 20:24 spamassassin -> ../spamassassin So which one it's correct? or it's a link? Thanks l = link d = directory but it´s no harm to le

Re: spamassassin upgrade

On Sunday 20 May 2007 17:38, night duke wrote: > Currently i have this version of spamassassin > > SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb > > Can i update it to the last version? > Apt-get or yum or howto? There's no newer official version in Debian at this time (the maintainer seems to be temporar

__AOL_FROM is too American?

Dears, the __AOL_FROM rule in the 20_ratware.cf file from the spamassassin ruleset looks for forged AOL From: addresses. I'm getting some messages from @aol.co.uk which score pretty high while looking legit. I see the rule is a: From:addr =~ /\@(?:aol|cs)\.com$/i which, whenever I was

Re: spamassassin upgrade

night duke wrote: I have debian... */Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* escribió: night duke wrote: > Currently i have this version of spamassassin > > SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb > > Can i update it to the last version? > Apt-get or yum or howto? >

What to do with spam?

I must told that i'm a little bit lost with spam... I have some doubts about spam...and fighting it... If i have a mail server what is the best idea for spam mails that are detected to keep them into the inbox of each user or to move them to each spam folder of each user? But i

Re: Two directorys of spamassassin

ls -al /etc drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 2007-05-20 17:48 spamassassin cd etc/mail ls -al lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 2007-04-09 20:24 spamassassin -> ../spamassassin So which one it's correct? or it's a link? Thanks Markus Edholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: Matt Kettle

Re: spamassassin upgrade

I have debian... Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: night duke wrote: > Currently i have this version of spamassassin > > SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb > > Can i update it to the last version? > Apt-get or yum or howto? > > Thanks I prefer to download the .tgz file from spamassassin.

Re: Two directorys of spamassassin

Matt Kettler wrote: night duke wrote: For a strange reason i have : /etc/spamassassin /etc/mail/spamassassin Why i have two directorys? Probably a screwed up install. Can i put all the files just on one directory /etc/mail/spamassassin? Yes. In fact, spamassassin will onl

Re: image link

night duke wrote: > Hi we receive a lot of email with an url link with .jpeg or .png files > like: > > htttp://urltosee.dot.com/files/images/ururr.jpeg > htttp://urltosee.dot.com/files/images/ururr.png > > How can i teach spamassassin to check that url? Can you be more specific? What do you wa

Re: spamassassin upgrade

night duke wrote: Currently i have this version of spamassassin SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb Can i update it to the last version? Apt-get or yum or howto? Thanks I prefer to download the .tgz file from spamassassin.apache.org and create the rpm myself via rpmbuild -tb file-just-dow

Re: http://www.moensted.dk/spam/

night duke wrote: > > I think this is a cool spam blacklist. Personally, I find it a little over-aggressive and prone to false positives. Even the sites own administrator (Dr. Mash) admits to this and for this reason intentionally does not provide any "how to" information on setting it up. Howev

Re: Two directorys of spamassassin

night duke wrote: > For a strange reason i have : > > /etc/spamassassin > /etc/mail/spamassassin > > Why i have two directorys? Probably a screwed up install. > Can i put all the files just on one directory /etc/mail/spamassassin? Yes. In fact, spamassassin will only use one of those. It will n

Re: spam forwarding

On Sunday 20 May 2007 14:17, Mark || Stream Service wrote: > Is it possible to forward all spam on a server to an other mail account (on > an other server) so I can look if there are any mistakes? > > Some system information: > - EXIM > - SPAM ASSASSIN (really nice tool) > - DEBIAN 3.1 Yes, variou

spamassassin upgrade

Currently i have this version of spamassassin SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb Can i update it to the last version? Apt-get or yum or howto? Thanks - LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 cénti

Two directorys of spamassassin

For a strange reason i have : /etc/spamassassin /etc/mail/spamassassin Why i have two directorys? Can i put all the files just on one directory /etc/mail/spamassassin? Thanks. - LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llama

http://www.moensted.dk/spam/

I think this is a cool spam blacklist. Does anyone know how can i user nomorefunn at my spamassassin? Thanks. - LLama Gratis a cualquier PC del Mundo. Llamadas a fijos y móviles desde 1 céntimo por minuto. http://es.voice.yahoo.com

image link

Hi we receive a lot of email with an url link with .jpeg or .png files like: htttp://urltosee.dot.com/files/images/ururr.jpeg htttp://urltosee.dot.com/files/images/ururr.png How can i teach spamassassin to check that url? Thanks. ---

spam forwarding

Hello, Is it possible to forward all spam on a server to an other mail account (on an other server) so I can look if there are any mistakes? Some system information: - EXIM - SPAM ASSASSIN (really nice tool) - DEBIAN 3.1 With kind regards, Met vriendelijke groet, Mark Scholten Stream Service W

Re: RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID false-positives?

Per Jessen wrote: Recently I seem to be getting more than the usual batch of FPs, which I've tracked to be due to RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID giving 2.2 points. According to the explanation, it reports an IP on an invalid block - RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID RBL: CompleteWhois: sender on invalid IP

Re: Zen and the art of assassinating spam

Jerry Durand wrote: Someone was asking about the Zen RBL from Spamhaus.org, it just occurred to me I should mention this for anyone who doesn't read the not-so-fine print. Do NOT use Zen for scoring mail bodies, Spamhaus tells you this and it will get you in trouble. Zen has includes dynamic