Hi Tony,
At 15:01 06-07-2007, Tony Houghton wrote:
I just use the one built in to my ADSL router; I don't know whether it
caches. The one it forwards to at my ISP is probably bind.
The DNS server on your ADSL router is built for residential
usage. If you are going to do a lot of DNS queries,
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, James D. Rallo wrote:
> Are you running a local dns caching server?
I just use the one built in to my ADSL router; I don't know whether it
caches. The one it forwards to at my ISP is probably bind.
> Do manual queries to rbls take a long time? (Hint: Don't run the query
>
Any other thoughts on this? I got another 5-6 spams this morning that were
scored 0 by Bayes. It's dragging down the hits from other rules!
omehegan wrote:
>
> I'm running SA 3.2.1 with Postfix, routing mail to it through spamd/spamc.
> I have a site-wide Bayesian database that I trained some t
Are you running a local dns caching server?
Do manual queries to rbls take a long time? (Hint: Don't run the query
again, as it may be cached up stream and may give a fast result.)
You didn't attach your conf, but you may also want to set
dns_available yes
in your local.cf to save the dns check.
I'm having a problem with spamassassin taking ages due to DNS lookups
timing out. I could make the timeout shorter, but I'd rather try to find
out what it's failing on and stop it trying to do those lookups. I've
made a log of its debugging output (attached) but I don't understand it
well enough to
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 20:15 +0200, Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> guenther schrieb:
> > Unfortunately, the example iXhash.cf of (current) version 1.0 is rather
> > scarce when it comes to the definitions. I'd wish for these to become as
> > informative again as they used to be. FWIW, these verbose descript
I have been asked to look into Microsoft Antigen Spam Manager (and MS
Forefront for Exchange Server). Does anybody have any information (or
can point me to independent reviews) as to how good this product is and
how it compares with SpamAssassin?
Thanks ...
guenther schrieb:
Unfortunately, the example iXhash.cf of (current) version 1.0 is rather
scarce when it comes to the definitions. I'd wish for these to become as
informative again as they used to be. FWIW, these verbose descriptions
and comments have been the reason for me to pick 2 out of 3 lis
Per Jessen schrieb:
I wasn't actually making any assumptions about the quality or lack of
it, that would not make any sense. I was really only concerned with
the trust issue, which I still say is paramount when it comes to spam.
And I don't believe you can establish trust by withholding or hidi
> I have been getting this error for some time now and have been trying to
> find the root cause of it.
>
>
> spamd[2681]: ldap: failed to load user scores from LDAP server, ignored
> (Can't locate object method "schema" via package "URI::ldap" at
> /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/LDAP.pm l
> > I'm starting to see a lot of AOL mail getting pushed into the
> > review folder (above 4.0 score) with the FORGED_AOL_TAGS rule
> > hitting, and apparently on real AOL e-mail. At least the
> > e-mails were SPF_PASS and received from an AOL server...
>
> Add this to local.cf, all fixed:
>
> sco
Does anyone have a spamd script for suse/SLES9 that they would be
willing to share? I have tried the scripts in the spamd folder and cn
not get these to work. I just need a basic script (like the one with
3.1). You could email it to me or upload to my site. Thanks
Chris
begin:vcard
n:Arnold;Chris
Rob McEwen wrote:
> But I think that my point
> was more that **results** matter **more** and one's lack of knowing
> the details about how a list works doesn't impact that list's quality.
OK, that is true of course. The knowledge of the details does not affect
the quality.
> It is your right to
Per Jessen wrote:
guenther wrote:
Dirk, I don't think this really puts an end to this discussion, and I
believe what Per actually was wondering about are some precise
statements about each of the iXhash lists sources. At the very least,
that is what I am wondering about. ;)
That is
Hello list,
I'm using Spamassassin 3.1.8 with amavisd-new 2.3.3 and postfix 2.4.3 on a
mailrelay. Some days ago I installed a new version of DCC. And saw in the
installation instructions that I should enable dccifd if I use spamassassin.
So I did. Now I get the following errors in my logs:
Jul
Per Jessen said:
> I beg to differ. I have to have _some_ idea about the data I'm using
> for my filtering. Personally, I can't use your "suck it and see"
> approach.
Hey, there is nothing wrong with your curiosity and I definitely understand
that how a list gets its data and what steps it tak
Matt Kettler wrote:
Note: for this to work 10_default_prefs.cf MUST NOT be in your
/etc/mail/spamassassin. It belongs in /usr/share/spamassassin, as do ALL
the rulefiles that come with SA.
Or in /var/lib/spamassassin/... after running sa-update
Bill McGonigle wrote:
On Jul 6, 2007, at 08:03, Lina, Patrick wrote:
Is there some way for SA to rewrite the header of mail with
a 15+ score so I get a copy (Bcc:) of those emails?
How about doing it the other way around? Set up postfix's always_bcc to
send a copy of all messages to a speci
On Jul 6, 2007, at 08:03, Lina, Patrick wrote:
Is there some way for SA to rewrite the header of mail with
a 15+ score so I get a copy (Bcc:) of those emails?
How about doing it the other way around? Set up postfix's always_bcc
to send a copy of all messages to a special account, then run
On Jul 6, 2007, at 05:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just out of curiosity: would the codes WKN or ISIN (in the same mail)
make any sense, other than in the context of stocks?
http://www.google.com/search?q=ISIN+WKN
Results 1 - 10 of about 2,540,000 for ISIN WKN. (0.04 seconds)
Looks like Ger
Hello Tarak,
Friday, July 6, 2007, 12:25:34 PM, you wrote:
> hi all,
> again i'm posting this issue .
> i am facing a serious problem regarding SPAM. i have spamassassin and
> rblsmtpd then also spam mails are
> going to user's inbox without tag and to postmaster's inbox with tag
>
Lina, Patrick wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a new user to this mailinglist and beginning SA learner.
> We have a site-wide postfix/spamassassin server, which tags
> spam and sends it to our internal Exchange server.
> Currently I'd like to train our bayes database with spam/ham
> but don't have a sufficient
Hi,
I'm a new user to this mailinglist and beginning SA learner.
We have a site-wide postfix/spamassassin server, which tags
spam and sends it to our internal Exchange server.
Currently I'd like to train our bayes database with spam/ham
but don't have a sufficient recent supply of either.
I'd lik
Just becareful with this solution, the ESA folder will grow relativly
fast but it"s work fine.
François Rousseau
2007/7/6, Duane Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 at 14:51 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> Hi
>
> I am working with MS Exchange 2003 on windows 2003. What is the
once marked, sieve can handle that.
Tarak Ranjan schrieb:
hi all,
again i'm posting this issue .
i am facing a serious problem regarding SPAM. i have spamassassin and
rblsmtpd then also spam mails are
going to user's inbox without tag and to postmaster's inbox with tag
***LOW SPAM*
On Fri, 6 Jul 2007 at 14:51 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi
I am working with MS Exchange 2003 on windows 2003. What is the filtering
software for spam assassin on windows?
I've never used it. However, I've seen referrences to it a number of times
in the past:
http://www.christ
going to user's inbox without tag and to postmaster's inbox with tag
***LOW SPAM*** per day 2000 to 3000. but i want to drop/delete those
mails from the server side.
how can i able to do that.. i'm using SpamAssassin version 3.1.4 +qmail
please help me out
Ask on the qmail list. SA only adds
hi all,
again i'm posting this issue .
i am facing a serious problem regarding SPAM. i have spamassassin and
rblsmtpd then also spam mails are
going to user's inbox without tag and to postmaster's inbox with tag
***LOW SPAM*** per day 2000 to 3000. but i want to drop/delete those
mail
Hi, folks,
I've seen plenty of spam hit the RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP rule and just
recently noticed that the default score is only 0.23.
My first impression is that if they're sending from an unassigned
address then I ought to just crank the score to 5 and be done with it.
I guess there's a case w
Hi, folks,
I've seen plenty of spam hit the RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP rule and just
recently noticed that the default score is only 0.23.
My first impression is that if they're sending from an unassigned
address then I ought to just crank the score to 5 and be done with it.
I guess there's a case w
You can try the Windows port of SA at http://sawin32.sourceforge.net/
(currently version 3.1.7). They have a POP3 proxy version called SAwin32
(designed for end-user mail clients), as well as a full-blown port of
SpamAssassin plus sa-learn and sa-update.
There's also a list of Windows SA-relate
just out of curiosity: would the codes WKN or ISIN (in the same mail)
make any sense, other than in the context of stocks?
Wolfgang
Hi
I am working with MS Exchange 2003 on windows 2003. What is the filtering
software for spam assassin on windows?
--
Geetha. S
Hi,
if your spam filtering happens via qmail scanner, you might want to get
latest version of that
Otherwise, if your final delivery is via .qmail files, you might find the
qtools package (from superscript.com or superscript.org) useful
Wolfgang Hamann
tarak ranjan wrote:
hi all,
i am f
Create a file with the email in it...(eg spam.txt) then run spamassassin
over it...
Spamassassin spam.txt
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 July 2007
Rob McEwen wrote:
> Why not just let the quality (or lack of quality) of the plugin speak
> for itself. If anyone stars spotting FPs (even a tiny but) and these
> trace back to Marc, THEN perhaps this would be a useful discussion.
I beg to differ. I have to have _some_ idea about the data I'm us
guenther wrote:
> Dirk, I don't think this really puts an end to this discussion, and I
> believe what Per actually was wondering about are some precise
> statements about each of the iXhash lists sources. At the very least,
> that is what I am wondering about. ;)
That is also what I was hoping f
Dirk Bonengel wrote:
> I know of one other contributor who explicitly wants to keep his
> involvment a secret. And that's why I've chosen to mention no-one in
> the first place. If you don't like that - don't use my lists.
I think you should at least mention (somewhere) that the data is not all
y
38 matches
Mail list logo
