Rose, Bobby wrote:
> I thought that was the purpose of the pyzor discover command? Who
> maintains 82.94.255.100 as it doesn't get listed with pyzor discover.
The alternative server aparently never got added to the discovery
service so the discover command will reset the contents to the original
I just found this in my inboy -is someone trying a new look of bounces?
I have replaced actual recipient with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wolfang Hamann
Received: from fc.williston.com (HELO williston.com) (68.112.246.229)
by mydomain.com with SMTP; 31 Jul 2007 04:53:13 -
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECT
I thought that was the purpose of the pyzor discover command? Who
maintains 82.94.255.100 as it doesn't get listed with pyzor discover.
http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=117911370318308
_
http://liveearth.msn.com
I thought that was the purpose of the pyzor discover command? Who
maintains 82.94.255.100 as it doesn't get listed with pyzor discover.
-Original Message-
From: User for SpamAssassin Mail List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 6:56 PM
To: Gary V
Cc: users@spamassassin
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Gary V wrote:
> >We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
> >
> >User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
> > > like my system is not getting pyzor to resp
Rick Macdougall wrote:
John Rudd wrote:
Diego Pomatta wrote:
That sounds more like "bounce and return" than "reject". If you
reject, the only chance you get to send an error is in the 1 line SMTP
5xx response code. If you really do mean "bounce and return" (accept
the message with SMTP 2xx
The new 3.2.2 seems to be significantly lighter on the CPU than 3.2.1
was. So far so good.
John Rudd wrote:
Diego Pomatta wrote:
That sounds more like "bounce and return" than "reject". If you reject,
the only chance you get to send an error is in the 1 line SMTP 5xx
response code. If you really do mean "bounce and return" (accept the
message with SMTP 2xx code, craft a new messa
Diego Pomatta wrote:
Jim Maul escribió:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
According to who, you?
He
We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
> like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
>
> When I do a "spamassassin --lint -D"
>
> I show:
>
>
Matus UHLAR - fantomas escribió:
On 30.07.07 14:10, Diego Pomatta wrote:
LoL. qmail rocks.
yes, google for "qmail bugs and withlist" for more info.
No problems here whatsoever.
And... I don't understand the point. Every piece of software has bugs.
Even the e-mail client you used
We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
> like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
>
> When I do a "spamassassin --lint -D"
>
> I show:
>
Hello,
I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
When I do a "spamassassin --lint -D"
I show:
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor: got response: 66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError:
debug: Pyzor: could
> >>On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
> >>>Any idea for qmail?
> >Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
> >>MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
> Jim Maul escribió:
> >According to who, you?
> >
>
Mark Killingback wrote:
I've been trying to solve this problem for several days now I'm getting
fed up :( Mail is getting through and being checked by spamassassin but
the bayes autolearn and auto-whitelist don't appear to be working and it
appears to be something to do with permissions.
[sn
Magnus Anderson wrote:
>
>
> Martin Schütte wrote:
>> Magnus Anderson schrieb:
>>> So basicly, I want to run the "spamassassin --revoke/--report" commands
>>> as a
>>> specific username. How can I do that?
>> man su
>>
>> For example: su vscan -c "spamassassin --report ${train_dir_sa_spam}/*"
>>
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
> I am using clamav as our virus scanner on our mail gateway (exim). This
> seems to discard lot of e-mails. Is there any benefit of using clamav
> for spamassassin from Sanesecurity?
There's no such thing.
If you meant the plugin, the answer is no; Exim will st
Diego Pomatta wrote:
> I'm new to custom rules. I've written my first one, and I was
> wondering if one of the list gurus could tell me if it's correct.
> Specially the regex part. Not sure since I don't know jack about Perl
> regex. :)
Very useful site:
http://www.regular-expressions.info/
> W
I keep seeing these in my postgresql log file. What did I do wrong?
ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding "UTF8": 0xd255
HINT: This error can also happen if the byte sequence does not match the
encoding expected by the server, which is controlled by "client_encoding".
STATEMENT: SELECT spam
Hi Justin,
Just a note to say I *think* your mods have worked... they're
currently running on a backup SA server and appear to be behaving as
expected.
I'm including the off list posts below so any others that hit this
problem stand a chance of getting an answer. Again, many, many thanks
for your
Jim Maul escribió:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
According to who, you?
He asked for a solution
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
According to who, you?
He asked for a solution for qmail. If you d
On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
> Any idea for qmail?
if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receiv
Magnus Anderson schrieb:
> The user is not exisiting on the system itself, just inside CommuniGate that
> I run.
> When I run now I run like "sa-learn --spam --no-sync -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /system-path-to-mbox"
AFAIK you cannot tell "spamassassin" to use another bayes DB.
So I see three other o
Hello all:
I'm trying to build Spamassassin 3.2.2 under AIX 5.3 with the AIX compilers. I
get the following errors while compiling spamc.
"spamc/libspamc.c", line 1050.14: 1506-275 (S) Unexpected text strm encountered.
"spamc/libspamc.c", line 1050.5: 1506-045 (S) Undeclared identifier z_stream.
Hey list.
I'm new to custom rules. I've written my first one, and I was wondering
if one of the list gurus could tell me if it's correct.
Specially the regex part. Not sure since I don't know jack about Perl
regex. :)
Would the following do the trick, if what I want is for all mail
containin
I've been trying to solve this problem for several days now I'm getting
fed up :( Mail is getting through and being checked by spamassassin but
the bayes autolearn and auto-whitelist don't appear to be working and it
appears to be something to do with permissions.
From my maillog I get the fo
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 10:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 09:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi all,
I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
If my init.pre has this line
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
could you try adding the 3.2.2 patch from
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5574 ? it could
be some buggy error-handling code is being triggered.
--j.
Nigel Frankcom writes:
>I'm top posting this since bottom posting is pointless. As far as I
>can tell each mail is being dea
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 09:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
>
> If my init.pre has this line
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
>
> now I check to see where the plugin actually is
>
> l
I'm top posting this since bottom posting is pointless. As far as I
can tell each mail is being dealt with twice. I'm really unsure what
to do; whether my mailserver is the problem or SA. Or, more
accurately, what change in the way SA handles headers has caused this
problem to appear on my server n
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 at 09:53 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
Hi all,
I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
If my init.pre has this line
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
now I check to see where the plugin actually is
locate URIDNSBL
/us
Hi all,
I wanted to confirm something here in my setup regarding the plugins-
If my init.pre has this line
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
now I check to see where the plugin actually is
locate URIDNSBL
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/man/man3/Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL.3
ah. so 'tis 'just' that "require". gr8.
i've become too attuned to the appearance of "fail" in --lint ouput ...
thanks!
On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 21:01 +0800, Spamassassin List wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated to 3.2.2. Encountered an error as follows:
>
> Jul 30 21:00:33 beyond spamd[20765]: dcc: check failed: failed to read
> header
> Jul 30 21:00:36 beyond spamd[20767]: dcc: check failed: util: setuid 0 to
> 508 f
Spamassassin List writes:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated to 3.2.2. Encountered an error as follows:
>
> Jul 30 21:00:33 beyond spamd[20765]: dcc: check failed: failed to read
> header
> Jul 30 21:00:36 beyond spamd[20767]: dcc: check failed: util: setuid 0 to
> 508 failed! at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_p
Hello all I need help, I'm using noSpamToday that soft include spamassassin
and all file, so I would to change something in my spamassassin, in local.cf
file I have this :
# Default template. Try to keep it under 78 columns (inside the the dots
below).
#
.
Hi,
I just updated to 3.2.2. Encountered an error as follows:
Jul 30 21:00:33 beyond spamd[20765]: dcc: check failed: failed to read
header
Jul 30 21:00:36 beyond spamd[20767]: dcc: check failed: util: setuid 0 to
508 failed! at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm
line
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 00:45 +0200, guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 13:30 -0500, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> > I may have dreamed it, but I thought I remembered a discussion about
> > removing rules with a zero score from spam reports. I upgraded one of
> > my systems to 3.2.2 today (Mandriva Co
MIKE YRABEDRA writes:
> For all interested, 3.2.2 is available via cpan now. :-)
yep; it looks like CPAN didn't like a .bz2 upload.
snowcrash+sa writes:
> i've sa v32-branch, r560837 installed.
>
> i have perl 588 + Mail::SPF installed,
>
> module_info Mail::SPF
> Name:Mail::SPF
> Version: v2.005
> ...
>
> but NOT Mail::SPF::Query.
>
> reading @ SA/INSTALL,
>
>
For all interested, 3.2.2 is available via cpan now. :-)
--
Mike Yrabedra B^)>
I am using clamav as our virus scanner on our mail gateway (exim). This
seems to discard lot of e-mails. Is there any benefit of using clamav
for spamassassin from Sanesecurity?
Regards
Sujit
-Original Message-
From: OliverScott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 July 2007 14:44
To
Hi All,
This morning I upgraded to 3.2.2 on CentOS 64 via yum.
I'm now getting a copy of all email headers inside the body of the
email.
Everything --lint's clean and apart from this it's working fine. As an
example I've copied in a list post below I received since the upgrade.
Any help or work
Spamassassin List wrote:
>
> Any idea for qmail?
Look on www.qmail.org for links - e.g. Qmail-Scanner allows you the
option of generating the bounce - or SMTP-level rejecting it as
mentioned in this thread.
--
Cheers
Jason Haar
Information Security Manager, Trimble Navigation Ltd.
Phone: +64 3 9
On 7/30/2007 1:30 AM, I wrote:
> use simscan. http://www.inter7.com/simcsan
oops, that's http://www.inter7.com/simscan
--
Jeremy Kister
http://jeremy.kister.net./
46 matches
Mail list logo
