I've been happily using SpamAssassin with MIMEDefang for nearly a year now.
I have a question about controlling and querying the whitelist.
The per-user automatic whitelist is enabled and clearly doing "something"
(because it's growing in size) but I can't find much documentation about it.
Is ther
> 'man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf' and read about bayes_ignore_header.
Very helpfully thanks :)
--
Massimiliano Marini - http://www.linuxtime.it/massimilianomarini/
"It's easier to invent the future than to predict it." -- Alan Kay
Folks, I'm trying to capture/grep specific given info from the subject
output, like this:
#spamassassin -D --lint | grep database
I KNOW that doesn't work, but describes my issue at hand. I've spent an
hour+ searching for others with this same question without success. I
remember this being poste
> -Original Message-
> From: David Allsopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:58 PM
>
> I've been happily using SpamAssassin with MIMEDefang for nearly a year
> now.
> I have a question about controlling and querying the whitelist.
>
> The per-user automatic
On czw, 2008-09-11 at 07:53 -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Folks, I'm trying to capture/grep specific given info from the subject
> output, like this:
>
> #spamassassin -D --lint | grep database
>
> I KNOW that doesn't work, but describes my issue at hand. I've spent an
> hour+ searching for other
Mariusz Kruk a écrit :
On czw, 2008-09-11 at 07:53 -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
Folks, I'm trying to capture/grep specific given info from the subject
output, like this:
#spamassassin -D --lint | grep database
I KNOW that doesn't work, but describes my issue at hand. I've spent an
hour+ searchi
Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Folks, I'm trying to capture/grep specific given info from the subject
> output, like this:
>
> #spamassassin -D --lint | grep database
>
> I KNOW that doesn't work, but describes my issue at hand. I've spent an
> hour+ searching for others with this same question without suc
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 07:53 -0500, Jack L. Stone wrote:
> Folks, I'm trying to capture/grep specific given info from the subject
> output, like this:
>
> #spamassassin -D --lint | grep database
>
spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep database
On czw, 2008-09-11 at 15:06 +0200, John Wilcock wrote:
> No need for that attitude, we were all newbies once...
Sorry, wasn't meant as an insult or anything like that. Was more like
surprised because I really didn't understand the problem.
> It wouldn't have taken any longer to give the actual so
On 10.09.08 11:24, PileOfMush wrote:
> No, I ran the spamassassin -d -t test as root. I'm not sure which user to
> run as. I'm using qmail on plesk. I have about 6 different users with
> the name "qmail" in them, plus a few "mail" related users as well as
> "popuser".
>
> Here is what's differen
Hello,
Is there any alternative to the %u, %l or %d options to the virtual-config-dir
option ? I have 12 000 mailboxes, that is, as many entries in only one
directory ...
Thanks.
Christian
David Allsopp wrote:
The per-user automatic whitelist is enabled and clearly doing "something"
(because it's growing in size) but I can't find much documentation about it.
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::AutoWhitelist
Is there any way to query the email ad
Hi !
Is it possible to redirect classified spam to another file, just after
classification, instead of
appending to the user regular mail file (like /var/mail/usermail) ?
Regards
David
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 05:03:06PM +0100, David Carvalho wrote:
> Is it possible to redirect classified spam to another file, just after
> classification, instead of
No.
> appending to the user regular mail file (like /var/mail/usermail) ?
SA isn't doing that either. It's just marking up the
David Carvalho wrote:
Hi !
Is it possible to redirect classified spam to another file, just after
classification, instead of
appending to the user regular mail file (like /var/mail/usermail) ?
sure. use maildrop, procmail, dovecot sieve, amavisd-new, postfix,
etc. SA is not involved
Does anybody have any experience with this product?
My company wants to replace SpamAssassin with this product, due to
SpamAssassin being not being up to par other products.
My argument is that people we give SpamAssassin to have no clue how to
use it and what it's designed to do, therefore
Rob
Can't say i have, but SA does need someone with a little expertise and a clue
(tm) to get it going well. After that it takes very little extra work apart
from upgrading every so often and running sa-update every week or so.
--
martin
-Original Message-
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
Rob,
Spamassassin is more difficult to configure because commercial products
don't have the luxury of requiring more sysadmin configuration. They
have to be easy or no one would buy them. The disadvantage of them
being easier is that they have less flexibility, less information and
less sit
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody have any experience with this product?
>
It appears *noone* has any experience with it... Google finds only 2
links and they are on the company's own homepage.
> My company wants to replace SpamAssassin with this product,
Hi,
Sorry I don't have experience with this product.
I do have limited experience with Barracuda Networks appliance and I
think is a great product for an e-mail filter which I had experienced
with my friend to set up on their network & email server. It is easy
to set up, configure and maintain
At 03:16 PM 9.11.2008 +0200, Mariusz Kruk wrote:
>On czw, 2008-09-11 at 15:06 +0200, John Wilcock wrote:
>> No need for that attitude, we were all newbies once...
>
>Sorry, wasn't meant as an insult or anything like that. Was more like
>surprised because I really didn't understand the problem.
>
>>
I just upgraded to 3.2.5 and have encountered some regressions.
First, I'm getting tons of the following in my logs, literally metric tons:
Sep 11 17:11:28 spamd2 spamd[27357]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at
/usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Check.pm line
Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In order to get it to stop, I had to disable the shortcircuit plugin in
> v320.pre. I filled a partition with this line in a couple minutes flat.
>
> I particularly value the savings I get from this plugin, so I would like
> to know how I can re-enable
I find i have to run botnet rules individually, not as the big meta rule. See
the doc in the tar ball for how to.
-- martin
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Stroik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subjec
24 matches
Mail list logo