Hi,
I'm currently working on a spamassassin plugin, which shall be able
to dynamically raise the score, as described on [1] below
Writing plugins with dynamic score rules. However for
some reasons the plugin needs to run on a spamassassin 3.1.7 which does
not support calling the got_hit function
-Original Message-
From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:max...@gmail.com]
Sent: dinsdag 31 maart 2009 20:56
To: hlug090...@buzzhost.co.uk
Cc: Rejaine Monteiro; Spamassassin list
Subject: Re: zen.spamhaus.org
When someone tells me 'their' list is much more aggressive than
spamhaus, my
Mark wrote:
I've been reading up a bit on Barracuda et al, like:
http://www.email-ethics.com/2009/01/emailregorg-project.html
http://zacharyozer.blogspot.com/2008/10/worst-engineers-ever.html
http://www.debian-administration.org/users/simonw/weblog/295
And now I'm even more convinced that I
Am 07. Apr 2009 um 01:52 CEST schrieb Adam Katz:
Here's a syntax file I created for Vim to highlight SpamAssassin
config files (see attached).
Thanks
augroup filetypedetect
au BufRead,BufNewFile *.cf setfiletype spamassassin
augroup END
I change this to:
,
| ugroup
Maybe they don't have the $25 or something
;-)
--
Neil Schwartzman
...would hope they have some money...
i found out about a nice family on the cabletv list and i was checking out
this guy and his wife that (if i recall correctly) were cable company people
making good money.
when
Hi,
I'm wondering about the best training strategy for the bayes engine.
Most bayes classifiers seem to recommend that spam/ham be fed in either
alternating or random. SA seems to suggest that all of one type be
trained, and then all of the other type. In my experience with other
programs
On 7-Apr-2009, at 13:30, Steve Bertrand wrote:
...apparently, not enough trouble:
Yep, they were found out via DNS. It is Their whois data that is
obfuscated
Domain Name:EMAILREG.ORG
Created On:12-Apr-2008 21:40:49 UTC
Last Updated On:02-Apr-2009 18:45:33 UTC
Expiration Date:12-Apr-2010
LuKreme wrote:
How about the 3rd post that exposes barracuda as a money-grubbing
racketeering operation?
Barracuda own and operate emailreg.org, although there is no mention
of this on the emailreg.org site, and the whois data is obscured.
Indeed the owners of emailreg.org have gone to a lot
On 7-Apr-2009, at 08:39, Rob McEwen wrote:
Mark wrote:
I've been reading up a bit on Barracuda et al, like:
http://www.email-ethics.com/2009/01/emailregorg-project.html
http://zacharyozer.blogspot.com/2008/10/worst-engineers-ever.html
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Jeff Rice wrote:
I'm wondering about the best training strategy for the bayes engine.
Most bayes classifiers seem to recommend that spam/ham be fed in either
alternating or random. SA seems to suggest that all of one type be
trained, and then all of the other type. In my
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know of a way to perform individual debug tests on the
DNSBL's listed in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf? In essence I need to see failures
and/or timeouts.
I have made some changes to my SA 3.1.7 20_dnsbl_tests.cf when I
compared it to the 3.2.5 release. I basically just removed
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know of a way to perform individual debug tests on the
DNSBL's listed in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf? In essence I need to see failures
and/or timeouts.
I have made some changes to my SA 3.1.7 20_dnsbl_tests.cf when I
compared it to the 3.2.5
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:09 +1200, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know of a way to perform individual debug tests on the
DNSBL's listed in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf? In essence I need to see failures
and/or timeouts.
spamassassin -D. In particular, I believe -D dns should
Michael Hutchinson wrote ... (4/7/2009 7:09 PM):
I have made some changes to my SA 3.1.7 20_dnsbl_tests.cf when I
compared it to the 3.2.5 release. I basically just removed 2 DNSBL
lookups that are redundant. This is done in attempt to solve an issue
random scan times of 30 seconds plus.
When
Hello Matt, thanks for the response.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:mkettler...@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:26 a.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hello Dave,
-Original Message-
From: Dave Koontz [mailto:dkoo...@mbc.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:34 a.m.
To: Michael Hutchinson
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
Michael Hutchinson wrote ... (4/7/2009 7:09 PM):
I have made some changes
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:guent...@rudersport.de]
Sent: Wednesday, 8 April 2009 11:31 a.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 11:09 +1200, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does anyone know
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I have done this, and appear to have quite a nominal time for those checks:
MailServer:~/spamassassin# spamassassin -D dns -t /root/SpamA.txt
[27256] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[27256] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.61
You might
MailServer:~/spamassassin# spamassassin -D dns -t /root/SpamA.txt
[27256] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? yes
[27256] dbg: dns: Net::DNS version: 0.61
You might want to fire up CPAN and upgrade Net::DNS.
[choke]. The last time I used CPAN for upgrading anything on this box,
it
I keep getting this line in my logs everytime there is a spamd calles
Apr 8 03:55:15 mx1 spamd[36109]: Use of uninitialized value $dir in
scalar chomp at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2118, GEN103 line 2.
i dont suppose this is normal
--
http://alexus.org/
alexus wrote:
I keep getting this line in my logs everytime there is a spamd calles
Apr 8 03:55:15 mx1 spamd[36109]: Use of uninitialized value $dir in
scalar chomp at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 2118, GEN103 line 2.
i dont suppose this is normal
Are you using the -v parameter when you
21 matches
Mail list logo
