> Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On tir 27 okt 2009 18:44:28 CET, John Hardin wrote
> >
> >>> 0.000 0 112532 0 non-token data: nspam
> >>> 0.000 0844 0 non-token data: nham
> >
> > try to get them more equal numbered in your trains
> >
> >> reflect yo
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:09:10 -0400
Alex wrote:
> In either case, is there a way to exclude mails with USER_IN_WHITELIST
> altogether? I have my ham level set at -0.3, but the USER_IN_WHITELIST
> (and there are quite a few) adds -100.0, automatically making it ham.
> I'm concerned that a spoofed m
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On ons 28 okt 2009 00:36:10 CET, rpc1 wrote
>
>> My spamassassin plug doesn't check mail where sender address and receiver
>> address are equal. Like this
>
> http://www.nabble.com/postfwd-stop-equal-sender-recipient-spams-td21164908.html
>
> or setup spf for your domain
On ons 28 okt 2009 15:42:19 CET, Adam Katz wrote
[snip]
forging one of them. My plugin maches userna...@domain1 to
userna...@domain2 if username1 == username2 regardless of domain.
legit users can not use smtp auth ?, hmm :)
--
xpoint
28.10.2009 16:42, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
>
> I scored that 0.1 ... rejecting based on sender==recipient would
> effectively be scoring it far higher, and would most certainly reject
> legitimate mail (lots of people send announcements via Bcc or Cc while
> addressing the message back to themselves
John Hardin wrote:
>
>
> The error message indicates the problem. If you use "@" in a RE, you need
> to escape it (e.g. "\@").
>
> Try changing that and see if SA passes a --lint check.
>
> _ALWAYS_ do a --lint check after editing your rules!
>
> --
> John Hardin KA7OHZ
Hi,
I haven't previously thought it to be much of an issue because the
volume has been low, but lately, the volume of spam from us.edir1.com,
relayed through edmta.net, is now high enough that I need some advice.
The relay is whitelisted by JMF_W, has GOODMAIL, IADB, SPF, and DKIM
signed, yet it'
Adam Katz wrote:
Messages2 and/or mkt058.com have been thorough in working to ensure
their mail gets delivered cleanly, using SPF, DKIM, and Habeas (which
are all sender verification tools, the last of which is a sort of "we
promise this isn't spam" tool). The message also has a
List-Unsubscrib
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Cardwell [mailto:spamassassin-us...@lists.grepular.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 27 October 2009 11:54 p.m.
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Geocities closed
>
> Alex wrote:
>
> > Thought I would pass along that geocities closed up and went home
Hi all,
I'm getting Spam which is addressed to another person in my company , but
it getting sent to me . So in my inbox the To Field is Kristin , but in
Jeremy's inbox.
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Jeremy Davila wrote:
I'm getting Spam which is addressed to another person in my company ,
but it getting sent to me . So in my inbox the To Field is Kristin , but
in Jeremy's inbox.
The information in the To: header has nothing to do with who actually
receives the messa
28.10.2009 22:07, Jeremy Davila kirjoitti:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm getting Spam which is addressed to another person in my company ,
> but it getting sent to me . So in my inbox the To Field is Kristin , but
> in Jeremy's inbox.
Hello. That is possible, the email is sent to whoever is in the RCPT-
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> 28.10.2009 16:42, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
>> I scored that 0.1 ... rejecting based on sender==recipient would
>> effectively be scoring it far higher, and would most certainly reject
>> legitimate mail (lots of people send announcements via Bcc or Cc while
>> addressing the m
> -Original Message-
> From: rich...@buzzhost.co.uk [mailto:rich...@buzzhost.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 October 2009 3:00 a.m.
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Geocities closed
>
> I just found this one working:
>
> http://uk.geocities.com/midsomerland/midsomerland_ind
Thanks John ,
How can I prevent this from Happening. I'm currently using Exim for the
SMTP relay then passing to Lotus Domino.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
John Hardin
10/28/2009 04:21 PM
To
users@spamassassin.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Spam with my company domain
On Wed,
What do you want to prevent from happening?
Mail that isn't specifically addressed "To" you not to get to you?
Look at the mail on this list:
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spam with my company domain
From: Jeremy Davila
You realize, that would mean you wouldn't get this list
I should have clarified that. I meant mail that isn't specifically
addressed to me .
Thanks for your response.
Evan Platt
10/28/2009 05:34 PM
Please respond to
users@spamassassin.apache.org
To
users@spamassassin.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Spam with my company domain
What do you wa
As John and a few others pointed out, you need to explain what
SPECIFICALLY you mean.
Or, give an example.
In your original example, you said the mail gets to you, but it says
To: Kirstin.
This is because the 'To" field that is shown in your mail client is -
well, can be anything. I can sen
Thanks for useful answers !!!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-reject-spam-where-sender-%3D-receiver-tp26086971p26103651.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Jeremy Davila wrote:
How can I prevent this from Happening.
As far as the "my address isn't in the To: header", you can't. That would
break lots of legitimate email, like BCCs and (as Evan pointed out) mail
from this mailing list.
I'm currently using Exim for the SMTP
Evan Platt wrote:
> What do you want to prevent from happening?
>
> Mail that isn't specifically addressed "To" you not to get to you?
>
> Look at the mail on this list:
Hm. It might be interesting to consider a meta connecting the lack of
a Precedence: of bulk or list with a test noting an abs
21 matches
Mail list logo
