Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-06 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
You should use SMTP authentication when posting through your SMTP server.i guess you are not. (And the SMTP server should not be on dynamic IP, of course) On 05.04.11 04:29, rstarkov wrote: I am using SMTP authentication, and it's on a static IP. It's the PC with my Thunderbird that's on

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-06 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Michael Scheidell wrote: you should disable the compile plugin, not bother compiling.  with a borked perl install, the best thing to do is start from scratch.  its almost impossible to fix. disable this v320.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody and

Create a rule to block MAX recipients

2011-04-06 Thread David Touzeau
Dear All I would like to create a rune in order to block messages that contains more than X recipients in Spamassassin from these fields To: CC: Bcc: This without any MTA help How can i do this Best regards ?

Re: Create a rule to block MAX recipients

2011-04-06 Thread Eduardo Casarero
2011/4/6 David Touzeau da...@touzeau.eu Dear All I would like to create a rune in order to block messages that contains more than X recipients in Spamassassin from these fields To: CC: Bcc: This without any MTA help How can i do this Best regards ? In 2009 i wrote this email to

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-06 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 19:18:39 +0200 (CEST), Marco Beishuizen mb...@xs4all.nl wrote: disable this v320.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody and restart spamd.  your errors will go away. you did not listen, but try: spamassassin 21 -D --lint | less any unwanted plugins failing

Re: Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm in @INC

2011-04-06 Thread Marco Beishuizen
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Benny Pedersen wrote: disable this v320.pre:loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Rule2XSBody and restart spamd.  your errors will go away. you did not listen, but try: spamassassin 21 -D --lint | less any unwanted plugins failing ?, or do you like to use more plugins

Re: Create a rule to block MAX recipients

2011-04-06 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, David Touzeau wrote: I would like to create a rune in order to block messages that contains more than X recipients in Spamassassin from these fields To: CC: Bcc: This without any MTA help How can i do this Dang, I thought these were already in my sandbox: describe

Re: Create a rule to block MAX recipients

2011-04-06 Thread Eduardo Casarero
2011/4/6 John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, David Touzeau wrote: I would like to create a rune in order to block messages that contains more than X recipients in Spamassassin from these fields To: CC: Bcc: This without any MTA help How can i do this Dang, I thought

Re: Create a rule to block MAX recipients

2011-04-06 Thread Adam Katz
On 04/06/2011 01:00 PM, John Hardin wrote: Dang, I thought these were already in my sandbox: describe TO_TOO_MANY To: too many recipients header TO_TOO_MANY To =~ /(?:,[^,]{1,80}){30}/ describe TO_WAY_TOO_MANY To: too many recipients header TO_WAY_TOO_MANY ToCc =~

Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-06 Thread rstarkov
no. You should just properly configure trusted_networks and internal_networks so all dnsbl rules would be used as they should. OK, so I need to add all of my ISPs dynamic IPs as trusted? (as suggested in http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DynablockIssues) It sounds backwards though; the

Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-06 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, rstarkov wrote: [snip..] if your MTA properly marks mail received with authentication and inserts authentication headers, SpamAssassin will take those headers and dynamic RBL checks should not apply. I don't think it does. Here's a sample email in its entirety:

Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-06 Thread rstarkov
Spamassassin does honor authentication headers that are -properly- added. (see rfc3848 for an official statement of what needs to be done). In your example that MTA (qmail?) did not add proper authentication headers. Ah right. Yes, it's qmail. It appears that RFC3848 is not directly supported

Re: Create a rule to block MAX recipients

2011-04-06 Thread John Hardin
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, Eduardo Casarero wrote: 2011/4/6 John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, David Touzeau wrote: I would like to create a rune in order to block messages that contains more than X recipients in Spamassassin from these fields To: CC: Bcc: Can you post an

Re: RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL on my own emails to self

2011-04-06 Thread David B Funk
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, rstarkov wrote: Ah right. Yes, it's qmail. It appears that RFC3848 is not directly supported by my managed server... It runs Plesk, and all I can find are a couple of lone voices asking for this to become supported (met with silence or people not knowing what on earth is