On Wed, 6 Apr 2011, rstarkov wrote: > [snip..] > > if your MTA properly marks mail received with authentication and inserts > > authentication headers, SpamAssassin will take those headers and dynamic > > RBL checks should not apply. > > I don't think it does. Here's a sample email in its entirety: > http://pastebin.com/3hR48LqX > > What sort of headers should be added? Should it mention something about > ESMTP in the "Received" header or something like that? >
Spamassassin does honor authentication headers that are -properly- added. (see rfc3848 for an official statement of what needs to be done). In your example that MTA (qmail?) did not add proper authentication headers. -- Dave Funk University of Iowa <dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering 319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527 #include <std_disclaimer.h> Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{