Michael Orlitzky skrev den 2013-05-08 17:24:
(replying randomly in the thread)
We've been getting complaints about these, so while I don't like to
target a TLD indiscriminately, I think I'd like to add a few points
to
mail from *.pw for a couple of months until things clear up.
What's the cor
Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-05-08 01:03:
Reporting abuse of a domain specifically registered with the clear
intention to spam, to the very domain's abuse@ address, is pointless.
It's like letting the spammers know you've read it...
that is correct if pw domains using there own mailserve
Steve Prior skrev den 2013-05-08 05:02:
Problem went away completely, sorry Palau.
postmap -q localpw.org hash:/path/to/map
it should not reject that one :)
bind9 rpz zone will be better solution, *.pw.rpz.localhost cname .
and then follow it with bind9 guide on setup the rpz in bind
its n
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 14:09 -0400, Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Well, I certainly hope someone offers to help!
Heh! I am really confident, Alex didn't mean to be rude, neither that he
actually hopes no one will help you. Quite the contrary...
He DID try to help you by explaining why a "default Bayes d
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 09:18 -0700, psychobyte wrote:
> My goal is to ignore several types of address from getting into the AWL
> database. So I'm creating a plugin that will set a lower priority for
> autolearn_discriminator(), run the autolearn_discriminator callback,
> check a list of ignored
On 05/08/2013 08:15 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
Andrew Talbot wrote:
Well, I certainly hope someone offers to help!
If only to say "there is no default database."
There is no default database. :-)
As we've spoken about off-list, my boss is being very particular about the
deployment of Bayes, and
Andrew Talbot wrote:
> Well, I certainly hope someone offers to help!
>
> If only to say "there is no default database."
There is no default database. :-)
> As we've spoken about off-list, my boss is being very particular about the
> deployment of Bayes, and it sounds like one of his caveats
Hypotheticians might want to look at jwhois, which is a caching whois
client. Cache expiration time is configurable ...
On 05/08/2013 06:45 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
> RE: .pw / Palau URL domains in spam
>
> Hypothetically if one were running a reputation system and didn't want
> to block all of
Well, I certainly hope someone offers to help!
If only to say "there is no default database."
As we've spoken about off-list, my boss is being very particular about the
deployment of Bayes, and it sounds like one of his caveats is that we don't
start from a blank database.
For the record, I a
On 05/08/2013 07:26 PM, Andrew Talbot wrote:
Hey all -
I remember seeing somewhere that there was a default Bayes database for
Bayes to start using right away, but can't seem to find that information
again on the Wiki or in my notes.
Can someone please help?
I hope nobody offers to help.
Why
Hey all -
I remember seeing somewhere that there was a default Bayes database for
Bayes to start using right away, but can't seem to find that information
again on the Wiki or in my notes.
Can someone please help?
On May 8, 2013, at 8:06 AM, Matteo Dessalvi wrote:
>
> I always thought that SA would be able to operate autonomously and that it
> will create the
> proper records in all the tables of the DB. Am I missing something? Is this
> the designed behavior?
>
It's been awhile since I wrote and loo
On 5/8/2013 12:06 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Bowie,
Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 4:35:35 PM, you wrote:
BB> makes a bit more sense.
Not a lot, though to have BAYES_20 and BAYES_$) scoring the same.
A 20-40% confidence level is not high enough to have a significant
positive score nor is it lo
Hi,
My goal is to ignore several types of address from getting into the AWL
database. So I'm creating a plugin that will set a lower priority for
autolearn_discriminator(), run the autolearn_discriminator callback,
check a list of ignored address types, then call
inhibit_further_callbacks()
Hello Bowie,
Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 4:35:35 PM, you wrote:
BB> makes a bit more sense.
Not a lot, though to have BAYES_20 and BAYES_$) scoring the same.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpqBdg1MLCZD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 5/8/2013 3:07 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello
Same score for BAYES_20 and BAYES_40 seems a bit strange
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_20 0 0 -0.001 -0.001
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_40 0 0 -0.001 -0.001
A score of -0.001 basically means that the rule is active, but has no
real effect on the fi
I posted this yesterday
for those wanting an SA rule, here:
header PW_IS_BAD_TLDFrom =~ /\.pw\b/
describe PW_IS_BAD_TLDPW TLD ABUSE
score PW_IS_BAD_TLD3
Change score to whatever you want. Enjoy.
--Chris
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Orlitzky [mailto:mich...@orli
(replying randomly in the thread)
We've been getting complaints about these, so while I don't like to
target a TLD indiscriminately, I think I'd like to add a few points to
mail from *.pw for a couple of months until things clear up.
What's the correct way to do this? A regexp on the from/return-
Hello,
Ran 'sa-update' after a few months and
ALL_TRUST stopped scoring for local network
systems. Put back the old rules from
backup and it works again. Searched for
change log or explanation and found nothing.
Does anyone know what the story is with this?
Running 3.3.2 under 'mimedefang' 2.7
On 5/7/2013 7:03 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 22:49 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
John Hardin skrev den 2013-05-05 22:44:
We request you to report the domain names at abuse.alert @registry.pw and
also cc the same mail to abuse.alert @directi.com.
why does abuse @any-send
Hypothetically if one were running a reputation system and didn't want to
block all of a TLD like .pw, one could:
Locally cache whois info
create a local rbl
check against a sending domain on the whois info based on both the registrar
and the creation date
Created On:08-May-2013 05:24:04 UTC
Name
Hi all.
I do hope that this question is not outside the scope of the list and
I apologize in advance if that is the case.
Currently I'am running this configuration on an email gateway server:
- Debian Linux Wheezy
- Postfix 2.9.6-2
- Spamassassin 3.3.2
- Amavisd-new 2.7.1
- Perl 5.14.2
- MySQL 5
> From: lcon...@go2france.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: dns*.registrar-servers.com as a rogue registrar?
> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 13:15:24 -0500
>
>
> Nearly all of the .pw domains have their authoritative NS at
> dns*.registrar-servers.com.
>
> that registrar and few othe
Hello
Same score for BAYES_20 and BAYES_40 seems a bit strange
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_20 0 0 -0.001 -0.001
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_40 0 0 -0.001 -0.001
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpY3KK2wQ_uW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
24 matches
Mail list logo
