On 11.07.14 22:20, Nick I wrote:
I implemented your patch, but unfortunatelly it did not work for me.
Authenticated sender IP address was recognised as trusted.
I still need to have 'smtpd_sasl_authenticated_header = yes' in my postfix
so i commented out these 3 lines.
I still don't
On 12.07.14 19:45, Benny Pedersen wrote:
meta BAYESSTOPPER (BAYES_99 BAYES_999)
score BAYESSTOPPER 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
tflags BAYESSTOPPER noautolearn
This is useless... BAYES_99 applies whenever BAYES_999 does.
If you trust it, you can simply set BAYES_999 to 1.5 (or, add 1.5 to
current 0.2)
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2014-07-13 12:30:
isn't the whole point of authentication to avoid scanning the
authenticated
IP in blacklists?
that would be a fault, since when its sent via smtps or submission it
would be in trusted_networks, but blindly think this is not spam is
another
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2014-07-13 12:33:
On 12.07.14 19:45, Benny Pedersen wrote:
meta BAYESSTOPPER (BAYES_99 BAYES_999)
score BAYESSTOPPER 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
tflags BAYESSTOPPER noautolearn
This is useless... BAYES_99 applies whenever BAYES_999 does.
If you trust it, you can simply
I run a web server, and for many of my hosting customers, I'll forward
their email to other mail servers. My own mail is stored on my server,
and spam has always been an annoyance, but some external mail servers
sometimes stop accepting mail from me, as it contains so much spam.
The problem is
On Sunday 13 July 2014 at 16:35:14, Pat Traynor wrote:
I run a web server, and for many of my hosting customers, I'll forward
their email to other mail servers. My own mail is stored on my server,
and spam has always been an annoyance, but some external mail servers
sometimes stop accepting
Pat Traynor skrev den 2014-07-13 16:35:
So my question is - are there any trustworthy Linux administrators out
there that I could hire that could look over my setup and figure out
what I'm doing so wrong?
dont ask for prof help here it will not work on an opensource maillist
:=)
but you
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 12:35:10 -0500
Steve Bergman wrote:
Is there some reason that the BAYES_99 + BAYES_999 score does not add
up to 5.0?
I'm trying to trust the defaults. But what would be the hazards of
leaving BAYES_99 at 3.5 and upping BAYES_999 to 1.5? It seems that I
should be able
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2014-07-13 12:30:
isn't the whole point of authentication to avoid scanning the
authenticated
IP in blacklists?
On 13.07.14 15:04, Benny Pedersen wrote:
that would be a fault, since when its sent via smtps or submission it
would be in trusted_networks,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2014-07-13 17:14:
What do I (or the others) miss here?
auth smtp users here can have dynamic ip in pbl, that does not mean its
spam sent from them on my postfix, but if my server ip was in pbl it
would be rejected on destinations, that would be my own fault,
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Antony Stone wrote:
Have you been able to identify whether the unsolicited mail which has been
thus detected is:
- genuine email (possibly of a marketing variety, but still deliberately
sent) from your hosting customers
It's absolutely not from MY customers. I don't let
On Sunday 13 July 2014 at 19:52:57, Pat Traynor wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Antony Stone wrote:
Have you been able to identify whether the unsolicited mail which has
been thus detected is:
- genuine email (possibly of a marketing variety, but still deliberately
sent) from your hosting
I resp. my mail provider set up an server side SpamAssassin filter for incoming
emails.
As far as I know SpamAssassin calculates a spamscore and puts a corresponding
header field
X-SPAM-SCORE into each msg header.
Now when I use Thunderbird client with POP3 to fetch all new incoming msgs from
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Benny Pedersen wrote:
but you can pastebin the rejected msg if possible then ask how to make that
spam tagged before leveing your ip, possible do remove permit_mynetworks in
postfix so only authed senders can spam, if that happens, then close that
domain
Pardon my
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Antony Stone wrote:
It's absolutely not from MY customers. I don't let anyone relay their
outgoing email through me.
On Sunday 13 July 2014 at 16:35:14, Pat Traynor wrote:
I run a web server, and for many of my hosting customers, I'll forward
their email to other mail
--As of July 13, 2014 7:56:38 PM +0200, Antony Stone is alleged to have
said:
On Sunday 13 July 2014 at 19:52:57, Pat Traynor wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Antony Stone wrote:
Have you been able to identify whether the unsolicited mail which has
been thus detected is:
- genuine email
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2014-07-13 17:14:
What do I (or the others) miss here?
On 13.07.14 18:27, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i yet to see that pbl ips with smtp auth here
any dynamic - dialup, DSL, cable ... ?
they are supposed to use authentication and should not get
Am 13.07.2014 20:00, schrieb Ben Stover:
I resp. my mail provider set up an server side SpamAssassin filter for
incoming emails.
As far as I know SpamAssassin calculates a spamscore and puts a corresponding
header field
X-SPAM-SCORE into each msg header.
Now when I use Thunderbird
Pat Traynor wrote:
I'm using Postfix for mail. I've done some research and implemented
several changes in my main.cf file with directives such as
smtpd_recipient_restrictions
smtpd_sender_restrictions
smtpd_helo_restrictions
and the like.
The smtpd_recipient_restrictions
On Jul 13, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Pat Traynor p...@ssih.com wrote:
On Sun, 13 Jul 2014, Antony Stone wrote:
Have you been able to identify whether the unsolicited mail which has been
thus detected is:
- genuine email (possibly of a marketing variety, but still deliberately
sent) from your
Pat Traynor wrote:
Benny Pedersen wrote:
but you can pastebin the rejected msg if possible then ask how to make
that spam tagged before leveing your ip, possible do remove
permit_mynetworks in postfix so only authed senders can spam, if that
happens, then close that domain
Pardon my
21 matches
Mail list logo
