On 11/13/2014 01:33 AM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:57:20 +0100
Axb wrote:
@Home I've blocked most these chinese freemailer domains including
126.com
139.com
163.com
188.com
189.cn
vip.163.com
vip.188.com
vip.qq.com
vip.sina.com
vip.sohu.com
vip.sohu.net
vip.tom.com
vipsohu.net
sohu.com
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 10:06:57 -,
"Kevin Golding" wrote:
Kevin> So anyone else want to raise their hands?
It depends.
Would I mind a bit of regular maintenance work? No, I wouldn't mind.
Would I mind a major change in how I run my server - for instance,
run a virus checker, or run the bleed
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Igor Chudov wrote:
Hello, how can I enable thos DOB URIBL? I have spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 running on Perl version 5.14.2. It does
not seem to trigger. Thanks
URIBL_RHS_DOB should be enabled by default in 3.4.0.
Are you by chance running with net
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 18:57:20 +0100
Axb wrote:
> @Home I've blocked most these chinese freemailer domains including
>
> 126.com
> 139.com
> 163.com
> 188.com
> 189.cn
> vip.163.com
> vip.188.com
> vip.qq.com
> vip.sina.com
> vip.sohu.com
> vip.sohu.net
> vip.tom.com
> vipsohu.net
> sohu.com
> sin
Hello, how can I enable thos DOB URIBL? I have spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 running on Perl version 5.14.2. It does
not seem to trigger. Thanks
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 06:49:38PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2014, Igor Chudov wrote:
>
> >They also are all base
Chris wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > The -D option takes an argument. If there is an argument following -D
> > then it becomes the argument to -D. In the above the argument to -D
> > is -t due to it being positioned after -D. That is not what you want.
>
> Sorry for the late reply Bob, have had
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, David B Funk wrote:
In my first message I included an example URL from an Amtrak ticket
notification that it fired on.
...
That same message also fired on URI_HEX, URIBL_RHS_DOB, STYLE_GIBBERISH, and
MPART_ALT_DIFF which were enough to overcome the BAYES_00 and cause an FP
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014, Joe Quinn wrote:
On 11/9/2014 11:07 AM, David B Funk wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2014, David B Funk wrote:
For NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR the rule is: /^https?\:\/\/\d{7}/is
If that pattern were terminated like:
/^https?\:\/\/\d{7}(?::\d+)?(?:\/|$)/is
it should prevent the FPs (hopefull
On 11/12/2014 12:57 PM, Axb wrote:
On 11/12/2014 06:45 PM, Joe Quinn wrote:
We've been getting hammered by spam from 163.com for quite a while now,
and I really /really/ want to blacklist it, but it's one of the largest
websites in the world.
Everything I have found on Google points to them bei
On 11/12/2014 06:45 PM, Joe Quinn wrote:
We've been getting hammered by spam from 163.com for quite a while now,
and I really /really/ want to blacklist it, but it's one of the largest
websites in the world.
Everything I have found on Google points to them being blatant spammers,
down to the Wik
We've been getting hammered by spam from 163.com for quite a while now,
and I really /really/ want to blacklist it, but it's one of the largest
websites in the world.
Everything I have found on Google points to them being blatant spammers,
down to the Wikipedia talk page. Does anyone else have
Does a whitelist format exist to whitelist an email list? What is the
format to whitelist individuals? I have people and lists improperly
showing up in my probably-spam folder so need to keep them in my inbox and
not allow spamassassin to toss any more of those messages out of my inbox
inappr
On 11/9/2014 11:07 AM, David B Funk wrote:
On Sun, 9 Nov 2014, David B Funk wrote:
For NUMERIC_HTTP_ADDR the rule is: /^https?\:\/\/\d{7}/is
If that pattern were terminated like:
/^https?\:\/\/\d{7}(?::\d+)?(?:\/|$)/is
it should prevent the FPs (hopefully with out destroying its
effectiveness
On November 12, 2014 12:52:45 PM Niamh Holding wrote:
BP> Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from cpan, next
BP> step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
Rpm.spec files tells what other rpms is needed, same does cpan, if perl is
installed from cpan and not ins
Hi Dan,
maybe the "simple" plugin I wrote for myself may be usefull for you:
https://blog.laussat.de/2014/08/15/gpg-spamassassin-plugin/
The plugin uses Mail:GnuPG to check if a message is signed or engrypted,
but it doesn't check if the signature is valid as
Mail::Spamassassin::Plugin::OpenP
On 11/12/2014 01:21 PM, Axb wrote:
On 11/12/2014 12:52 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:04:26 AM, you wrote:
BP> Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from
cpan, next
BP> step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
SA has always
On 11/12/2014 12:52 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:04:26 AM, you wrote:
BP> Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from cpan, next
BP> step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
SA has always been built from source here.
is
Am 12.11.2014 um 12:51 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:42:57 AM, you wrote:
RH> yum don't touch anything which is not installed as RPM
SA was always built from source!
frankly don't *premature stop reading* if you don't want others stop
explaining you your own operat
Hello Benny,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:04:26 AM, you wrote:
BP> Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from cpan, next
BP> step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
SA has always been built from source here.
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Hello Reindl,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 11:42:57 AM, you wrote:
RH> yum don't touch anything which is not installed as RPM
SA was always built from source!
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpR7Vn45_D6t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Am 12.11.2014 um 10:05 schrieb Niamh Holding:
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 8:41:04 AM, you wrote:
A> Just make sure you "yum remove spamassassin" or you'll have a mix/mess
Yes, though why yum "updated" stuff it didn't install is a mystery to me
yum don't touch anything which is not installe
On November 12, 2014 9:32:46 AM Axb wrote:
You've neglected updating for so many years, this should be a lesson.
Keep away from precompiled problems is my rule and this includes windows :)
On November 12, 2014 9:20:04 AM Niamh Holding wrote:
Nice downgrade of SA to spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.3.1-4.el5 :(
Search in yum for cpan 2 rpm wrappers, then build a new sa from cpan, next
step is to upgrade to this localy builded sa rpm
Just rememeber to do this with all dependics, and l
A> yum update -y && reboot
Nice downgrade of SA to spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.3.1-4.el5 :(
ok.. not so tragic... Old centos, old SA version - form now on no more
SA setup from yum
You can use yum to install SA from the Fedora project, if you use Copr:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/ke
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 8:41:04 AM, you wrote:
A> Just make sure you "yum remove spamassassin" or you'll have a mix/mess
Yes, though why yum "updated" stuff it didn't install is a mystery to me.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
p
On 11/12/2014 09:38 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 8:29:16 AM, you wrote:
A> you'll have to do some manual work and the install SA 3.4 from source
That's how I have always installed SA
A> you will need a spam init script
/etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
# Optio
Hello Axb,
Wednesday, November 12, 2014, 8:29:16 AM, you wrote:
A> you'll have to do some manual work and the install SA 3.4 from source
That's how I have always installed SA
A> you will need a spam init script
/etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
# Options to spamd
SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m5 -H -D dns"
On 11/12/2014 09:29 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A> yum update -y && reboot
And bind downgraded from 9.9.2P1 to 9.3.6P1
Some "update", wonder what else has been downgraded?
you need a consistent Centos setup - later you can update
On 11/12/2014 09:20 AM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A> yum update -y && reboot
Nice downgrade of SA to spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.3.1-4.el5 :(
ok.. not so tragic... Old centos, old SA version - form now on no more
SA setup from yum
yo
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A> yum update -y && reboot
And bind downgraded from 9.9.2P1 to 9.3.6P1
Some "update", wonder what else has been downgraded?
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpMUjQVsjZWE.pgp
Descript
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A> yum update -y && reboot
Oh and no reboot despite
Complete!
Broadcast message from root (pts/1) (Wed Nov 12 08:15:55 2014):
The system is going down for reboot NOW!
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni.
Hello Axb,
Tuesday, November 11, 2014, 7:48:53 PM, you wrote:
A> yum update -y && reboot
Nice downgrade of SA to spamassassin.x86_64 0:3.3.1-4.el5 :(
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgp8EQI2ai_Ns.pgp
Description: PGP signature
32 matches
Mail list logo
