Re: SoughtRules

2016-08-30 Thread Bill Cole
On 30 Aug 2016, at 11:03, Anthony Hoppe wrote: If they're not updated, is it possible to grab the ruleset without subscribing? There's no real "subscribing" to update channels per se. If you run sa-update with no arguments it checks for updates in the updates.spamassassin.org channel, for wh

Re: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Michael Parker
Apologies if any of this ends up being not so up to date. It’s been ages since the Check plugin was written. You’re most likely going to want to write your own Check plugin to change this behavior. If you look at check_main you’ll see the DNS based tests get fired off before the priority loop

Re: sa-update errors

2016-08-30 Thread John Hardin
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016, Joseph Brennan wrote: We've had errors the past 2 nights for all of the uridnsbl_skip_domain rules. It's just us? It's been fixed, waiting for a new update to be generated by masscheck. -- John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@imp

Re: sa-update errors

2016-08-30 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 30.08.2016 um 21:56 schrieb Joseph Brennan: We've had errors the past 2 nights for all of the uridnsbl_skip_domain rules. It's just us? no since there where yesterday at least two treads about this topic, the first by me and AFAIR it should have been fixed last night but wasn't which ind

sa-update errors

2016-08-30 Thread Joseph Brennan
We've had errors the past 2 nights for all of the uridnsbl_skip_domain rules. It's just us? Redhat 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 > spamassassin -V SpamAssassin version 3.4.0 running on Perl version 5.10.1 I'm inserting blank lines for clarity, in case my email client starts wrapping: config: fai

Re: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 30.08.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Kris Deugau: Nicola Piazzi wrote: How to do it syncronously ? It is not important to process a single mail in 5 or 50 seconds 4 me ss most important to reduce load DNS lookups have essentially zero cost next to almost anything else SA does when it comes to da

Re: R: R: R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Kris Deugau
Nicola Piazzi wrote: > How to do it syncronously ? > It is not important to process a single mail in 5 or 50 seconds > 4 me ss most important to reduce load DNS lookups have essentially zero cost next to almost anything else SA does. I can say for certain that shortcircuit works; I use it on the

Re: R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Henrik K
Only if you want to patch spamassassin https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5930 On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 02:30:48PM +, Nicola Piazzi wrote: > And there is not a solution ? > > Nicola Piazzi > CED - Sistemi > COMET s.p.a. > Via Michelino, 105 - 40127 Bologna - Italia > Tel.  +3

2 Plugins

2016-08-30 Thread Nicola Piazzi
Here 2 plugins selfmade http://saplugin.16mb.com/ If someone send me a feedback it will be appreciate

Plugin development: Node get_header / _decode_header

2016-08-30 Thread Merijn van den Kroonenberg
Actually I am not sure if this is the correct list, as its about plugin development.. (is that users or dev?) I have a pluging for detecting attachment file types. It uses Mail::SpamAssassin::Message::Node get_header method for getting the content type header (and thus the attachment filename). H

R: R: R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Nicola Piazzi
How to do it syncronously ? It is not important to process a single mail in 5 or 50 seconds 4 me ss most important to reduce load -Messaggio originale- Da: RW [mailto:rwmailli...@googlemail.com] Inviato: martedì 30 agosto 2016 17:24 A: users@spamassassin.apache.org Oggetto: Re: R: R: Sh

Re: SoughtRules

2016-08-30 Thread Anthony Hoppe
Ahh. Ok, perhaps I want to avoid them, then... :-D - Original Message - From: "Axb" To: "SpamAssassin" Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 10:42:08 PM Subject: Re: SoughtRules On 08/30/2016 07:32 AM, jdow wrote: > On 2016-08-29 17:51, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: >> >> Am 30.08.2016 um 02:45 sch

Re: R: R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread RW
On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:48:03 + Nicola Piazzi wrote: > em is that dns check are made asincronously > if it will be made sincronously it will happen like you said > it is not important slowind down all messages because I save a lot of > query and cpu Running then synchronously would mean runnin

Re: SoughtRules

2016-08-30 Thread Anthony Hoppe
If they're not updated, is it possible to grab the ruleset without subscribing? I wouldn't mind taking a look at 'em at least. I want to avoid the rules becoming "dangerous" like the SARE rules. ~ Anthony - Original Message - From: li...@rhsoft.net To: "SpamAssassin" Sent: Monday, Au

ApacheCon Seville CFP closes September 9th

2016-08-30 Thread Rich Bowen
It's traditional. We wait for the last minute to get our talk proposals in for conferences. Well, the last minute has arrived. The CFP for ApacheCon Seville closes on September 9th, which is less than 2 weeks away. It's time to get your talks in, so that we can make this the best ApacheCon yet. I

Re: R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Axb
On 08/30/2016 04:43 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: I'm assuming that BAYES_ZERO is a meta of some sort. Would you also need to set priority on the other referenced rules, or does SA handle that? My clairvoyant talent is rusty and as the OP didn't post more info, I blabbered based on what he posted.

R: R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Nicola Piazzi
BAYES_ZERO is : body BAYES_ZERO eval:check_bayes('0.00', '0.00') but is the same with all other rules problem is that dns check are made asincronously if it will be made sincronously it will happen like you said it is not important slowind down all messages because I save a lot of query and cpu

Re: R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Bowie Bailey
I'm assuming that BAYES_ZERO is a meta of some sort. Would you also need to set priority on the other referenced rules, or does SA handle that? Also, keep in mind that if you can make this work, you will effectively be speeding up the processing of mail that matches BAYES_ZERO (slightly), whi

Re: R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Axb
shot in te dark: what happens if you do priority BAYES_ZERO -2000 shortcircuit BAYES_ZERO ham On 08/30/2016 04:30 PM, Nicola Piazzi wrote: And there is not a solution ? Nicola Piazzi CED - Sistemi COMET s.p.a. Via Michelino, 105 - 40127 Bologna - Italia Tel.

R: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Nicola Piazzi
And there is not a solution ? Nicola Piazzi CED - Sistemi COMET s.p.a. Via Michelino, 105 - 40127 Bologna - Italia Tel.  +39 051.6079.293 Cell. +39 328.21.73.470 Web: www.gruppocomet.it -Messaggio originale- Da: li...@rhsoft.net [mailto:li...@rhsoft.net] Inviato: martedì 30 agosto 2016

Re: Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread li...@rhsoft.net
Am 30.08.2016 um 16:21 schrieb Nicola Piazzi: When i shortcircuit a rule not all other are bypassed Here an example ... Local.cf : priority BAYES_ZERO -980 shortcircuit BAYES_ZERO ham the dns stuff is fired asynchronous long before bayes is even evaluated

Shortcircuit work partially

2016-08-30 Thread Nicola Piazzi
When i shortcircuit a rule not all other are bypassed Here an example ... Local.cf : priority BAYES_ZERO -980 shortcircuit BAYES_ZERO ham Spam report : -0.03 ABUSIX_PRESENCE Contatto Anti-Abuse presente in abuse-contacts.abusix.org -1.00 BAYES_ZERO Bayes Zero

Re: SoughtRules

2016-08-30 Thread Axb
On 08/30/2016 11:03 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote: I now realize you asked about SOUGHT while I gave you a bit of SARE history . SOUGHT rules were created by Justin Mason, SA's chief dev/inventor for many years. They were also independent from the Apache SpamAssassin project and when

Re: SoughtRules

2016-08-30 Thread Merijn van den Kroonenberg
> > I now realize you asked about SOUGHT while I gave you a bit of SARE > history . > > SOUGHT rules were created by Justin Mason, SA's chief dev/inventor for > many years. > > They were also independent from the Apache SpamAssassin project and when > he moved on to a new job area, he opted to shu

Re: SoughtRules

2016-08-30 Thread Axb
On 08/30/2016 09:59 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Anthony Hoppe wrote: I just learned about the sought ruleset via https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy. Is this ruleset still actively maintained? I'm considering implementing it in my environment, b

Re: SoughtRules

2016-08-30 Thread Axb
On 08/30/2016 09:59 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote: On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Anthony Hoppe wrote: I just learned about the sought ruleset via https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy. Is this ruleset still actively maintained? I'm considering implementing it in my environment, b

Re: SoughtRules

2016-08-30 Thread Merijn van den Kroonenberg
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Anthony Hoppe wrote: > >> I just learned about the sought ruleset via >> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ImproveAccuracy. Is this ruleset >> still actively maintained? I'm considering implementing it in my >> environment, but want to make sure just in case. > > Sadly,