I could be asking the same thing as Charles, if I am I apologize.
I installed the rules below, ran the headers.txt file- thru SA and the rules
did not trigger. Do I need to configure something else?
Thanks
Craig
>>> Charles Gregory 5/1/2009 9:48 AM >>>
Uh, what do the
if ever feel we are expert enough to help answer
any, or more sadly, take the time too. I do appreciate those of you who help
people like me out!
Cheers-
Craig
>>> Sergey Kovalev 1/9/2009 3:52 AM >>>
Craig wrote:
>
> Here are the links to 3 sample messages-
&
>>> Randy 1/8/2009 8:09 AM >>>
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 07.01.09 11:46, Craig wrote:
>
>> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP
>>
>
>
>>>>> Randy 1/6/2009 2:42 PM >>>
>>>>>
Links would help-
http://pastebin.com/d59f95b6d
http://pastebin.com/d17f12f4
http://pastebin.com/m46ce2877
>>> "Craig" 1/7/2009 11:46 AM >>>
>>> Randy 1/6/2009 2:42 PM >>>
Craig wrote:
>
>
> >>> Randy 1/6/2009 2:18 PM >>
>>> Randy 1/6/2009 2:42 PM >>>
Craig wrote:
>
>
> >>> Randy 1/6/2009 2:18 PM >>>
> Craig wrote:
> > Hello All-
> >
> > I have recently been getting MANY spam slipping through Spamassassin
> > and I am looking for help o
>>> Randy 1/6/2009 2:42 PM >>>
Craig wrote:
>
>
> >>> Randy 1/6/2009 2:18 PM >>>
> Craig wrote:
> > Hello All-
> >
> > I have recently been getting MANY spam slipping through Spamassassin
> > and I am looking for help o
>>> Randy 1/6/2009 2:18 PM >>>
Craig wrote:
> Hello All-
>
> I have recently been getting MANY spam slipping through Spamassassin
> and I am looking for help on how to stop. I have used Spamassassin
> with Bayes successfully for many years now and once
f the rule names/
scores.
Thanks,
Craig D. Cocca
Lead Developer
ULTIMATE Internet Access
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
short of all these 70K+ PDF
messages. What is recommended bypass these days considering the types of
spam out there? I raised it to 128*1024, but I don't want to choke these
heavily used gateways.
begin:vcard
fn:Dr. Craig Carriere
n:Carriere;Craig
org:Cobatco Inc.;Technology Developmen
Not really SA specific, but to add to your list are the SaneSecurity
virus definitions for ClamAV which also apparently catches a lot of
this type of rodent-mail if you are willing to use third party virus
definitions.
I have also enabled additional RBL look-ups for our site for some of
the qu
Jonathan:
No need to apologize at all; you did me a favor by letting me know we
were still having these issues with our ISP's "anti-spam" methods. Will
get this sorted out one way or the other. Trying to keep your user's
mailboxes free of spam is work enough, but having to to battle with your
IS
Perhaps more a clamav question, but does anyone use the additional
definitions for clam from SaneSecurity and are they helpful in the Spam
Wars?
Thanks
Matt wrote:
>> First - use dummy MX records. Real mail retries. Botnet and must
>> spammers don't. It's easier for them to try to spam someone else than to
>> fight your filter. MX config is as follows:
>>
>> dummy - 10
>> real - 20
>> real-backups - 30
>> dummy - 40
>> dummy - 50
>> dummy - 60
>
system any more and after many user
> complaints, I've opted to turn it off. However, setting use_bayes 0
> doesn't seem to do anything; messages are still coming through with
> BAYES_99.
>
> Is anyone else having this issue? Is my database just being poisoned
> over and o
very confused now.
How does it determine which message to use for the 'old score' ?
if I wanted to assign a negative number to those addresses that are
whitelisted in order to let more of them through, what am I supposed to use
if not AWL ?
thanks,
On 31 May 2007 at 11:56, Craig
is in the auto white-list
where
did the -0.1 come from? how can i change it to -1.0 ?
thanks.
begin:vcard
fn:Dr. Craig Carriere
n:Carriere;Craig
org:Cobatco Inc.;Technology Development
adr:;;1215 NE Adams Street;Peoria;IL;61550;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work
not be called.
Clay Davis wrote:
Should I be concerned with the following as a result of "--lint
-D"?
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
check_mx_delay 5
warning: description for FS_START_DOYOU2 is over 50 chars
Thanks,
Clay
begin:vcard
fn
alled SA
> once more again via cpan, while earlier versions installed with Debian
> Sarge worked ok. Also earlier versions installed via cpan on top of
> Red Hat 7.3 worked ok.
>
>
>
begin:vcard
fn:Dr. Craig Carriere
n:Carriere;Craig
org:Cobatco Inc.;Technology Development
adr:;;1215
Stephen:
A follow up to my own message. I have been able to successfully install
3.2 on my backup SLES 10 mail server from the download source code.
CPAN still fails with the error you mentioned. When I installed 3.18 I
used CPAN without problems.
Best
Craig Carriere wrote:
> Step
examined in: log/d.spamc_z/out.1
> t/spamc_z...FAILED tests 2-9
> Failed 8/9 tests, 11.11% okay
>
> Thanks,
>
>
begin:vcard
fn:Dr. Craig Carriere
n:Carriere;Craig
org:Cobatco Inc.
adr:;;1215 NE Adams Street;Peoria;IL;61550;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:309.676.2663
tel;fax:309.676.2667
url:http://www.cobatco.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
not too spammy otherwise, but from a layman's perspective,
definitely not something that should be on a whitelist. I know how to
remove from the whitelist, but how did they get there in the first
place?
Thanks, gang.
Clay
begin:vcard
fn:Dr. Craig Carriere
n:Carriere;
ertrap.com
_
begin:vcard
fn:Dr. Craig Carriere
n:Carriere;Craig
org:Cobatco Inc.
adr:;;1215 NE Adams Street;Peoria;IL;61550;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:309.676.2663
tel;fax:309.676.2667
url:http://www.cobatco.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
your DNS server
caches the result.
Bret
begin:vcard
fn:Dr. Craig Carriere
n:Carriere;Craig
org:Cobatco Inc.
adr:;;1215 NE Adams Street;Peoria;IL;61550;USA
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:309.676.2663
tel;fax:309.676.2667
url:http://www.cobatco.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
probability is 20 to
40%
[score: 0.2729]
Thoughts?
Thanks
Craig
I utilize amavisd-maia (Maia Mailguard) which provides updated rules
stats. The program also provides an easy method to constantly train
your bayes filters. You might want to take a look at it.
Best
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:03 +0100, Chris Lear wrote:
Does this really mean that auto-learn is "out of balance"? My first
guess is that this site probably relies only on SA to combat spam and
does little at the MTA level to reject UBE mail. They may even run a
catch-all account which would markedly increase his spam count if he is
not rejecting for
Robert:
It sounds like your problem rests with your bayes database. Some SA
rules will fire on almost all mail, but a properly trained bayes filter
should be able to reduce your scores to under your spam threshold. None
of these scores rate out very aggressively so I am surprised that these
are
Mário Gamito wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can i know how many messages did already sa-learn processed ?
You mean the total number of messages learned in the bayes database
(includes sa-learn and autolearn)?
sa-learn --dump magic
Make sure you run as SA user to query the right database.
Could future versions of sa-update please be a little more vocal?
Like maybe "no new updates found | loaded xxx new updates | error xxx"
Exit codes are not evident when simply typing sa-update on the command
line...
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/sa-update-too-quiet-
correct answers.
Are there some changes I can do to SA to allow me to continue upgrading to the
latest versions of SA, or am I going to top out at 3.1.7?
Obviously I could give Missing_HB_SEP a score of 0, but I would prefer to keep
all tests.
Thanks
Craig Canfield
and if so can I get them, and
if so, how?
If not, can anyone suggest resources that might help me write
my own test(s)? Particularly of interest are routines that
measure the source length or decoded area of an image.
Thanks,
Craig MacKenna
www.animalhead.com
P.S.: those of you interested in DN
line?
If so, is this a known problem and is there a fix available?
Thanks for your consideration,
Craig MacKenna
www.animalhead.com
Los Gatos, CA
Do you have a size limit set? I.E. only messages less than xxx size
will be scanned-and are these spam greater than xxx.
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/4/2007 4:14 AM >>>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Running spamassassin 3.0 and I'm invoking it through amavisd. When I
> train the spamassassin using sa
with Guinevere, and Groupwise is my mail
application.
Any and all suggestions are welcome!
>>> Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/06/2006 5:01 PM >>>
Craig wrote:
> Yes I have asked this question previously, but with not as much detail.
>
> MY ENVIRONMEN
Yes I have asked this question previously, but with not as much detail.
MY ENVIRONMENT
SA 3.1.7
running on Windows 2000
Using Bayes
In the past 2 days my email server has received 14,973 email messages,
Spamassassin has scanned 10,951 of those messages, and my users have received @
250 spam
es backend..
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
] is just for a test.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sourceforge.net
Use this to supplement the whitelist_from addresses with a check
against the Received headers. The first parameter is the address to
whitelist, and the second is a string to match the relay’s rDNS.
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Thanks for your quick reply
Ok, I am new to this-and I am sure its a "no brainer" but "non-spam
tagging" -I do not understand. If you could explain-or if its documented
feel free to scold me-I would appreciate it.
Craig
>>> "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL
Below are the results from a Spamassassin -D test of a message that was
previously delivered this morning. How does something like this pass
through- when I run the checks on the email after it is delivered the
system clearly knows its spam.
Thanks
Craig
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=20.3
write a rule or two to offset the score.
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
procedures.
Point well taken Gary.
I didn't see much of anything on this subject in the Wiki.
Neither did I.
I've been googling a bit and the cornucopia of hits for
+spamassassin is a mess. :-)
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
rt MailScanner I see "Read 755
hostnames from the phishing whitelist"
As a follow-up: http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=maq:index
#
For whitelist: edit the spam.whitelist.rules from the rules directory
following the format shown in the file.
#
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
rt MailScanner I see "Read 755
hostnames from the phishing whitelist"
thanks for any help
[snippage]
X-English-FSU-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted),
I think you answered your own question here..
'not spam (whitelisted)' is not something SA adds.
Might wanna
me info on installing procmail ?
http://www.google.com/search?q=installing+procmail
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
se to SpamAssassin. Once SA gets a mail, it'll be scanned.
Is there a FAQ entry for this somewhere on the wiki?
If not, there should be.. This is the 3rd or 5th time in the past couple
days something similar has been asked..
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
your MTA's documentation to find the recipe though.
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
case, yes.
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
be redirected/ quarantined for further inspection) can not parse the
score directly.
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
Look for the TEMPLATE TAGS section, in particular the _STARS(*)_ tag.
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
sa-update, even though it's been out for months. I suggest we add a
section to the next release announcements about it.
Since its right off the home page and there is a tab for it labeled
'Docs', this would be an excellent place:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc.html
--
Crai
Michael W Cocke wrote:
I can't get the imgeinfo plugin to load with SA 3.17?
I put this in v310.pre
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ImageInfo
Try this:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::ImageInfo ImageInfo.pm
--
Craig
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Craig Morrison wrote:
Todd A. Jacobs wrote:
I was perusing the man pages for spamd in spamassassin 3.1.7, and came
across something that seems to imply that I can use spamc to tell spamd
to update a sitewide bayesian database:
-l, --allow-tell
Allow learning and forgetting (to a local
r' and 'content-length' spamd headers.
For spamc:
spamc ... -L spam|ham|forget -C report|revoke ...
--
Craig
don't know what more to do. Sometimes the same message ends up in my
junk filter, and the bayes score is in the header. I'm at a loss.
Thanks, Craig
The message got sent back to me, so i'm going to have to just paste what
I can from the headers...
To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
just your general nature, I wouldn't
trust anything you published for consumption.
--
Craig
Jack Gostl wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Craig Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "spamassassin"
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: saupdate
Please keep replies on the list fo
Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Craig Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 12:53 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: A false positive...
TZ format you should consider sa-learn'ing the messages as
ham. On your
SA
actual kill and restart?
That is highly dependent upon how spamd is invoked.
--
Craig
Thanks for the response.
It was invoked through /etc/inittab with the command:
spam:2:once:/usr/opt/perl5/bin/spamd -m20 -d -A 10.165.1.3,127.0.0.1 -i
Which means no automatic respawning. So does spamd respond
o I need an actual kill and restart?
That is highly dependent upon how spamd is invoked.
--
Craig
as ham. On your
SA setup these messages are hitting BAYES_95 which is adding 3 points to
their score.
--
Craig
ow I've asked Google why they don't have a logo change for
> > Memorial Day. Why do they choose to do logos for other non-international
> > holidays, but nothing for Veterans?
> >
> > Maybe they forgot who made that choice possible.
>
> I would think a phone call to your account manager with an appropriate
> link to the guys website would be enough to get the problem solved.
>
> http://www.blars.org/blars06c.jpg
>
> A copy of your past quarter bill from ATT would help to put the point
> into perspective.
by appearances, he doesn't seem much like that AT&T type - that picture
pretty much sums it up.
;-)
Craig
that we've been getting
hit *really* hard. After deciding that the load average was likely due to
actual spam load, I implemented a couple of RBLs at the MTA level. My load
is now back down between 1 and 3, and messages making it through to SA are
now back to around 200,000 per day.
this is very likely not what is causing your problem. But it
sometimes pays to consider the non-obvious. Your problem may be caused by
something relatively unrelated to (but affected by) mail.
Craig
Quoting Matias Lopez Bergero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello!
I was very happy using SpamAss
, and switch
to something else for the SpamAssassin server.
cheers,
Don Craig
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2006, 11:17:59 PM, Donald Craig wrote:
And Theo Van Dinter pointed out:
You're not by chance using the opendns.{com,org} folks for DNS, are you?
And Theo Van Dinter pointed out:
You're not by chance using the opendns.{com,org} folks for DNS, are you?
Of course. I'm an idiot. I switched to OpenDNS a couple of weeks back.
Time to return from whence I came. Thank you,
with lookups in http://www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi
This is SpamAssassin 3.1.5, all was fine in 3.1.2.
For now I have set both those tests to 0.00.
Don Craig
rule would be failing. Can you post one as a txt message
Sure:
http://pastebin.com/769187
Note that I am aware that I am running an older version of SA (3.0.x).
Unfortunately, upgrading is not feasible at this time.
Thanks for any help or advice you can give!
Craig
ago, I was getting
flooded with these, and I solved the problem by using the SARE_HTML_NO_BODY
rule from 70_sare_html4.cf. However, this rule does not seem to hit on this
recent crop of empty messages. I have no idea why.
Is anyone else seeing these, and more importantly, does anyone have a rule for
them?
Craig
http://www3.2cah.com/spam/sa_slowhtml.txt
I got inundated with messages similar to this today. The average scan
time here for these is 25+ seconds when the box is under _low_ load.
My guess is that it has to do with the number of URLs.
Any thoughts on this?
--
Craig
d whatever is calling SpamAssassin
(MailScanner) should be at least faking it in the message it hands SA.
Daryl
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/EnvelopeSenderInReceived
Is also useful for the bag of tricks too..
--
Craig
add_header all Status _YESNO_, hits=_HITS_ required=_REQD_ tests=_TESTS_
autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_
report_safe1
The point is, who or what is calling spamassassin..
You have to have something in the mix of things that is screwing with
your headers. Even with report_safe 0, SA adds the X-Spam* headers..
--
Craig
r better yet, use mockingbirds instead of pigeons,
I think this new internet architecture will stop the spammers in their
tracks. No, really, it will.
Either that or get them shat on, which would be a messy affair. :-D
/me goes back to lurking...
--
Craig
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 16:02 -0600, Nels Lindquist wrote:
> On 25 Jul 2006 at 14:17, Craig White wrote:
>
>
>
> > http://www.mailscanner.info/linux.html
> >
> > This is the information page for installing MailScanner on RPM based
> > Linux system.
> >
Cabell
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Craig White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 12:00 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Help for beginner
>
> On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:16 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > FWIW, Dale
ds a lot of requisite perl packages and
finally mailscanner itself into rpm files and installs the rpm's (or not
if you already have newer versions of the rpm's installed already). It's
a sophisticated, comprehensive approach to installing a whole lot of
stuff and doing it the way the system is configured (via rpm).
Craig
other lists locally ? Commercial agreements
also are ok.
Are you running a local caching nameserver?
For my group that seems to help a great deal.
--
Craig
mple 555.555., 555-555-, 555 555 , 555-
555-, (555)555., etc etc. So you have to write your rules to take
that into account.
Craig
efraud me. Maybe I won't bother
> playing their game.
>
> Loren
Heh, got this one yesterday:
From: "Lazarus Dennis"
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bastard
And thought, why's he calling me a bastard? Maybe he knows his crap
isn't going to get through.
ago.
FWIW I have had real success using FBSD-6.0-RELEASE, SA from CPAN and
spamass-milter and sendmail from the ports collection. Just lately I've
moved away from the milter, towards a procmail-based SA setup for better
configurability. Ping me if you want more details.
C.
- --
Craig McLea
.
> Some humor was needed.)
You mean calling GPL License 'nonsense' wasn't your best effort of the
day?
You hurled similar bombshells on other lists?
Craig
>
Don't know about 3.1.3, but Axel hosts 3.1.2 at atrpms.net:
http://atrpms.net/dist/fc4/spamassassin/
instructions on setting up yum to use the atrpms repo can also be found
on the site:
http://atrpms.net/install.html
C.
- --
Craig McLeanhttp://fukka.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello all,
I've had a good look around but am unable to find an answer to this
exact scenario. I've had a bash @ using global settings on the
user_pref's file, but didn't appear to work, so figured I'd ask. If you
are aware of a reference to this that I've missed, I apologise.
Pretty much al
supported as vendor-supported. This is not being thorough,
for what seems like an urgent issue.
--Sandy
.
FREE emoticons for your email! click Here!
<http://www.incredimail.com/index.asp?id=98432>
--
Craig
e message according to the result code is
too good to give up :)
Thanks,
Craig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig McLean wrote:
>
> Razor and multi.uribl.com RBL for the first 3
Oops, and multi.surbl.org...
C.
- --
Craig McLeanhttp://fukka.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where the fun never starts
Powered by FreeBSD, and GIN!
rect plugin
and a rule which gives any geocities URL a healthy dose of points (a la
http://fukka.co.uk/sa-rules/local/misc.cf) for the second 2.
XBL and spamcop (no flames please) for all, plus make sure you get your
bayes trained on this type of spam to drive the score up there, too.
Mine doesn
>> 3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is
classified
>> as spam (spamassassin.bat -e < mailfilein > mailfileout) Known
>> issue/bug?
>There is something about exit codes in the changelog.
I had checked the changelog and didn't see anything obviously relevant.
Craig
Windows Server 2003 SP1
ActivePerl 5.8.8.817
Upgrade from a working 3.1.1 installation
3.1.2 is not setting a non-zero exit code when a message is classified
as spam (spamassassin.bat -e < mailfilein > mailfileout) Known
issue/bug?
Craig
> i've come up with this
>
> #!/bin/bash
>
> for i in $( ls /home/MYDOMAIN); do
> sa-learn --spam /home/MYDOMAIN/i$/mail/Junk
> done
>
> If i set it to run as a cron job once a week, Will that do what I want it
> to do?
>
Almost certainly no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chan, Wilson wrote:
> Any else having this problem with spamass-milter with spamassassin?
Nope.
(ask a vague question...)
C.
- --
Craig McLeanhttp://fukka.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where the fun never starts
Powered
ad, Given:
> --
> 4.8 FROM_KING_COM From known spammer 'king.com'
and:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd say that the FROM_KING_COM rule might be misfiring, and for 4.8
points too!
C.
- --
Craig McLeanhttp://fukka.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where the fun never
ned...
Thanks,
C.
[1] http://fukka.co.uk/sa-rules/local/PhoneBL.pm
[2] http://fukka.co.uk/sa-rules/local/phone.cf
[3] http://fukka.co.uk/sa-rules/local/evilnumbers.db
- --
Craig McLeanhttp://fukka.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where the fun never starts
Powered by FreeBSD, and GIN!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> Craig,
>
> How do you have procmail set up to deliver to the spam vs. likely spam
> folders?
Use the "X-Spam-Level" marker. Anything with < 10 stars and a
"X-Spam-Status" of "Yes"
#x27;t
>> even have to scan them.
>>
>>
>
> Which brings up the subject... How legitimate is email sent as
> windows-1252?
I have a bunch of stuff from paypal and ebay, and much more, which
include this charset.
I'm not attempting to answer the philosophical question,
spam into different folders.
This means we can quickly see misfires either way, and has the added
benefit over milter-level bounces that bayes gets to see everything too.
C.
- --
Craig McLeanhttp://fukka.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where the fun never starts
Powered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David B Funk wrote:
> On Tue, 16 May 2006, Craig McLean wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> [snipped]
>>
>> I use this style to catch a couple of common text formatting oddities
_DODGY_DIVS m'(?:\s{0,}?[\$%\w]\s{0,}?.{1,40}?){30}'i
Stick with rawbody, you don't need full. Also, you'll probably want
case-insensitive, and \s{0,}? to match zero or more whitespace.
C.
- --
Craig McLeanhttp://fukka.co.uk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Where the fun ne
27;i
describe T_4_DODGY_DIVS Testing...
score T_4_DODGY_DIVS0.01
(note, the regexp should be on one line with no spaces)
That will catch it. You'd have to see what it FPs on though.
You could also get it to pick on single alphas between html tags with a
little tweaking.
C.
- --
Craig M
XT_LOANBODY: Loan at a certain rate.
2.0 TVD_DEAR_HOMEOWNER BODY: TVD_DEAR_HOMEOWNER
1.5 CM_CREDIT_SCOREBODY: Your score doesn't matter
1.0 CM_IMMEDIATE_CASH BODY: Immediate cash
1.0 CM_DEAR_HOMEOWNER BODY: Dear Homeowner
Plus BAYES_99 for 4 points, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig McLean wrote:
> Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> These homeowner spasm are still getting through ( a lot less though since
>>> adding the KAM_GEO_STRING2 rule.
>>>
>>> I do NOT
ozen "%" characters.
If you are going to match, try doing it with patterns, like (off the top
of my head, and untested!)
/(?:£\$}\s?\d+(?:[\.,]\d+)?.{1,20}\d.{1,10}%/
might attempt to match:
"$250,000 loan at 6.35%"
"£ 1 for you just 6%!"
C.
- --
Craig McLean
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo