ee use_pyzor\t1 on the log)
On 2023-04-30 09:33, Henrik K wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 12:42:43PM +0200, i...@servermx.com wrote:
Hello,
we have installed Spamassassin (debian 11.6) vesion 4.0 from source.
With backend MariaDB 10.5.18-MariaDB-0+deb11u1 - Debian 11.
Spamassassin is
Hello,
we have installed Spamassassin (debian 11.6) vesion 4.0 from source.
With backend MariaDB 10.5.18-MariaDB-0+deb11u1 - Debian 11.
Spamassassin is raising these messages
info: config: not parsing, administrator setting: use_pyzor\t0
info: config: failed to parse line in (sql config) (line
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
Am 08.02.2017 um 11:16 schrieb i...@lauf-forum.at:
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
I also don't understand why I didn't have the problem till some
months ago.
I can't remember that I changed anything on the Mailserver
Zitat von Reindl Harald :
I also don't understand why I didn't have the problem till some months ago.
I can't remember that I changed anything on the Mailserver configuration.
Does anyone have an idea what's going wrong?
that messages within the server itself are
I seem to be having a hard time writing rules which anchor
a string to the start of the line in the body of a text message.
e.g., suppose I get a lot of phish which contain text (not html)
like this:
Username:..
Password:..
I try what seemed intuitively easy:
body__PHISH1
Hi,
Before I try to roll my own, does anyone have a set of rules or a plugin
designed to detect all these webmail account phishes. You know -- the kind
that pretend to be a webmail administrator who informs the user his/her
webmail account is being upgraded or has exceeded quota or whatever ..
Hi
Can someone suggest a rule (or rules) which will count the number of
lines in the body of a mail message? Or alternatively, a rule which
will tell me if a message contains less than N lines in its body?
Suppose, for example, I am looking to penalize messages which contain
a specific url and
Eloise Carlton writes:
Thank you for taking the time to report and share this information. We
have initiated an investigative process on this report and during the
investigative period we have downgraded the sender's accreditation
level.
Thank you, Eloise. I greatly appreciate Habeas'
not convinced that spamd has ever found it, or that it is ever actually
being used.
If I telnet to port 783 I do get spamd debug messages.
Paul Hilton
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:04, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:57:02PM -0500, Info wrote:
Why is spamd running with a home directory
,
and I currently have SPAMD_ARGS=-d -a -L -D -x -u vscan, and
/etc/init.d/spamd does:
startproc -p /var/run/spamd.pid $SPAMD_BIN $SPAMD_ARGS
Paul Hilton
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 10:01, Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 09:51 AM 12.7.2004 -0500, Info wrote:
Theo,
Thanks for the reply, and there may be some
spamd was never being used, and
wouldn't benefit me if it were.
Conclusion: Don't use spamd.
Thanks for the help
Paul Hilton
On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 15:04, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:57:02PM -0500, Info wrote:
Why is spamd running with a home directory under /tmp
Hello
Why is spamd running with a home directory under /tmp ?
I have spamassassin working as a mail filter under Amavis and Postfix
and SuSE.
I am trying to use spamd to speed things up.
I have two problems
1) I don't think that Amavis is actually using spamd
2) Spamd is not configuring
12 matches
Mail list logo