On 31.3.2010 14:02, Andrea Bencini wrote:
I installed with yum lhe following pakages:
postfix, amavisd-new and spamassassin.
I have *.cf in /usr/share/spamassassin/ directory and now I would like
update them.
Is it possible? with sa-update?
If yes which is the complete command to use to
On 30.3.2010 12:04, Martin Svensson wrote:
Thanks for your response. The problem is unfortunately still not solved.
Yesterday I dropped the database and re-created it from bayes_mysql.sql
file that is bundled with the SpamAssassin package (and added a
lastupdate field).
Just a double
On 27.3.2010 0:44, Brody wrote:
Hi,
I've got a linux box running sa 3.2.5
normally sa is invoked via amavis, however for this test I'm running it
via spamassassin -D msg
It seems that sa isn't hitting any of the more useful rules i.e. ones
that should cause it to increase the score.
On 25.3.2010 10:14, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Having this in the bayes db:
335424 nspam
144915 nham
129892 ntokens
and a fairly good hit rate by Bayes in detecting both spam and ham, how
would you improve Bayes scores?
In example, would you increase every bayes
On 25.3.2010 20:30, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I have increased BAYES_00 and BAYES_99. It seems that those are pretty
good and cause no FP's, but BAYES_05 may sometimes be spam. I have
BAYES_99 as a killer, it has 5 points, sending the mail to a 'probable
spam' alone.
Ah, that is even
On 22.3.2010 16:51, micah anderson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:45:53 -0700, John Rudd jr...@ucsc.edu wrote:
Some people need to put in some alternate values for DNS timeouts, but
if you've got a local caching name server, you typically don't need
that.
There aren't any actual bugs in it
On 11.3.2010 15:18, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Martin Gregorie mar...@gregorie.org wrote:
Post the entire message to pastebin or a similar site and send the URL
here together with your explanation of what happened so we have
something to work with.
I am sorry I
On 11.3.2010 16:41, Carlos Mennens wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
You still posted not enough data. There is only the headers the link.
Here is the entire message:
http://pastebin.com/MtXWXdvc
That is hard. Only one URL in the body.
X-Spam
On 9.3.2010 20:24, Curtis MacDuff wrote:
My Bayesian filter keeps getting screwed up and causing mail flow to
stop. The problem seems to be expiring tokens out of the database. My
expiry setting is set to 200,000. I've tried many different settings for
this but they all seem to behave about
On 8.3.2010 21:33, Renata Dias wrote:
Some messages receive score 0.00/0.00 and other receive the correct
score like the example below.
...
I'm updated SpamAssassin to p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.3.0_3 and rules are
/var/db/spamassassin/3.003000/ .
Can someone help me?
You showed a
On 5.3.2010 17:23, Stephane MAGAND wrote:
Hi
ok i have put
bayes_sql_override_username
and now that's work thanks ;=)
Another small question, after bayes, can i put AWL in MySQL ?
Yes you can, it's all in the doku or wiki. Anyway:
--- local.cf --
# Enable awl
On 4.3.2010 17:07, Blake101 wrote:
Sorry if there is already a tread about this.
When trying to send a test message, I get the following error.
error closing STDOUT: Broken pipe at /usr/bin/spamassassin line 409.
any ideas why I get this
Sending a message is an alien concept to
On 5.3.2010 0:04, Walter Breno wrote:
Hi, i have some problems with false positives so i need that the e-mails
with spamassassin score 2 or 3 has being marked as spam but delivered to
the user, what is the parameter that can help me with this problem?
SpamAssassin does not do anything in order
On 3.3.2010 15:22, twofers wrote:
I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to
work. this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a
day and Spamassassin does not even check them.
Thats hundreds of these every day for weeks and weeks and weeks on
On 3.3.2010 15:34, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 3.3.2010 15:22, twofers wrote:
I have 52 of these sitting in my inbox this morning when I came in to
work. this is just the beginning. I get literally hundreds of these a
day and Spamassassin does not even check them.
Thats hundreds
I just found this rule in SA
1.6 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
digit (alv.john2[at]gmail.com)
What's the rationale? Many FreeMail users end up having a digited
username, as the wanted username is reserved. How is it a sign of
On 20.2.2010 17:29, LuKreme wrote:
On 20-Feb-2010, at 08:21, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I just found this rule in SA
1.6 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
digit (alv.john2[at]gmail.com)
What's the rationale?
The rational
On 19.2.2010 12:42, tonjg wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
That is not the recipe I meant. That calls SA yes, but does not
reject. I can't provide a recipe for procmail as I personally use
maildrop, but the recipe that is needed is one filing the spam to a spam
folder (or /dev/null
On 18.2.2010 18:16, tonjg wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
you seem to be running mimedefang which takes care about the e-mail. I
have no idea how does mimedefang interact with spamassassin, but I think
you should ask your question in mimedefang mailing list, or at least
search the
On 19.2.2010 1:48, Chris wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:59 -0800, tonjg wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
How does MimeDefang reject anything if it does not scan it? Your log
header sample looked like it was scanned by MimeDefang. Propably MD
calls SpamAssassin in it's scan process just like
On 19.2.2010 1:48, Chris wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:59 -0800, tonjg wrote:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
How does MimeDefang reject anything if it does not scan it? Your log
header sample looked like it was scanned by MimeDefang. Propably MD
calls SpamAssassin in it's scan process just like
On 30.1.2010 19:14, Ralph Bornefeld-Ettmann wrote:
in the Raw Message tab you can get the plain message
(http://spamalyser.com/v/5cbffujq/raw)
It's not raw message, it has a line number on each row.
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
You may be recognized soon. Hide.
signature.asc
Will the new 3.3 be announced for Lenny (possibly via backports) or do I
need to use CPAN?
Thanks for info.
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
That secret you've been guarding, isn't.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I'm trying to install it via CPAN or debian deb, so I do not have the
sql-readme available.
The AWL format changed, can someone post the MySQL desc output please?
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
That secret you've been guarding, isn't.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 27.1.2010 10:43, Henrik K wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:38:38AM +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
I'm trying to install it via CPAN or debian deb, so I do not have the
sql-readme available.
The AWL format changed, can someone post the MySQL desc output please?
http://svn.apache.org
On 22.1.2010 10:53, Mariusz Kruk wrote:
On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 19:47 +1100, Jean-Yves Avenard wrote:
In a previous post, i have request a information, can i use one
central bayes database
for a lot of SpamAssassin Server.
I have received a answer: Yes
But what is the process ?
I use a
On 15.1.2010 10:21, geoff.spamassass...@alphaworks.co.uk wrote:
I occasionally get a spam leaking through without having been processed
by SA despite passing the part of my procmail filtering where SA is
called. These spams are always at the time of scheduled SA restarts so I
assume they slip
On 11.1.2010 10:35, Michael Monnerie wrote:
Another FP on hostkarma:
bsmtp5.bon.at[195.3.86.187]
Please investigate and fix. And put them on YELLOW, they are an ISP here
in Austria. Please check bsmtp[1-9] also.
Hello. Your PGP key has expired, my software says. Just FYI.
--
On 5.1.2010 13:09, Angel L. Mateo wrote:
Hello,
Because FH_DATE_PAST_20XX bug, I have found that when I run spamassassin
through amavisd-new (in a postfix server) I need to restart spamassassin
and amavisd-new after any change in spamassassin.
Debugging this, I found that amavisd-new doesn't
On 16.12.2009 18:15, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 16 dec 2009 16:49:52 CET, Charles Gregory wrote
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
http://www.vintage-computer.com/asr33.shtml
There was actually a time when I had one of those in my house.
For your amusement:
On 17.12.2009 23:10, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On 16.12.2009 18:15, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 16 dec 2009 16:49:52 CET, Charles Gregory wrote
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
http://www.vintage-computer.com/asr33.shtml
There was actually a time when I
On 5.12.2009 16:03, LuKreme wrote:
On Dec 4, 2009, at 13:42, Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
Content analysis details: (14.9 points, 5.0 required)
14 of your points come from the IP being listed. It was not listed
initially, and score 0.9 on your tests based on that.
Really
On 4.12.2009 18:00, Thomas Harold wrote:
SA had a lot of trouble identifying this as spam. The IP
(174.139.37.196) is not yet listed in a lot of the DNSBLs. So it only
scored around a 1.0 on the spam meter.
http://pastebin.com/m1d0a75b7
It uses a block of foreign language spam at the
31.10.2009 23:26, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
Brilliant minds think alike ;-) I have very similar rules in my
khop-general channel:
header KHOP_BIG_TO_CC ToCc =~ /(?:[^,\...@]{1,6...@[^,]{4,30},){10,19}/
describe KHOP_BIG_TO_CC Sent to 10+ recipients instaed of Bcc or a list
score
28.10.2009 16:42, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
I scored that 0.1 ... rejecting based on sender==recipient would
effectively be scoring it far higher, and would most certainly reject
legitimate mail (lots of people send announcements via Bcc or Cc while
addressing the message back to themselves).
28.10.2009 22:07, Jeremy Davila kirjoitti:
Hi all,
I'm getting Spam which is addressed to another person in my company ,
but it getting sent to me . So in my inbox the To Field is Kristin , but
in Jeremy's inbox.
Hello. That is possible, the email is sent to whoever is in the RCPT-TO
27.10.2009 23:14, fugtruck kirjoitti:
I have an SMTP gateway setup with Postfix+SpamAssassin on a CentOS 5.3 server
that is functioning. Lately, I've noticed an increase in the amount of SPAM
getting through the gateway. That's when I discovered an error that is
showing up daily in the
23.10.2009 4:52, MySQL Student kirjoitti:
Hi,
On the message that should have been scanned:
The emails that has not been tagged at all:
[...]
From: Angus - 3idea angus.d...@3idea.com
To: supp...@3idea.com
Are you forwarding this spam from your internal account to this other
23.10.2009 18:26, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
Dan Schaefer wrote:
The emails being sent to postfix-users-dig...@cloud9.net are
messing with my head. I setup a filter to put emails sent to
users@spamassassin.apache.org into a SA folder. Whenever an email
gets sent to
23.10.2009 20:04, MySQL Student kirjoitti:
Hi,
SpamAssassin DOES NOT bypass scanning, if the internal or trusted
networks contain the server in it.
Hmm.. thanks for correcting me.
How would you, then, go about preventing SA from scanning the
localhost or a specific domain without
If you have any old portable oven and in case you don't use it anymore,
we will be very grateful to you if you can donate it to us and organize
transport of this oven to our address (200km from Moscow). This ovens
are different, usually they made from cast iron.
Dozens of these for months
22.10.2009 22:26, John Hardin kirjoitti:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
What's the business model of this scam? I can't believe they really
want millions of iron cast ovens from all around the world. Maybe I
should answer and ask directly ;D
Was the from address something
22.10.2009 23:24, Michael Scheidell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
If you have any old portable oven and in case you don't use it anymore,
we will be very grateful to you if you can donate it to us and organize
transport of this oven to our address (200km from Moscow). This ovens
22.10.2009 23:39, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
On tor 22 okt 2009 21:37:28 CEST, Jari Fredriksson wrote
The message does not have any attachments, it is a plain text from a
poor woman in Russia.
how do you know ?, was there picture in the mail ?, if so how can you be
sure its hir picture
21.10.2009 18:40, Lars Ebeling kirjoitti:
Why aren't mail from United Parcel Service scanned?
The last 24 hours have i got about 20 of them and none scanned.
Those are not scanned in *my* system just because they are scanned by
amavisd-new before they will be scanned by SA. As they
20.10.2009 16:25, jp kirjoitti:
As an admin with two years of CS education... I think Spamassassin is one of
the easiest programs to get, install, etc.. The documentation on it's tests
is great. There's no voodoo like many anti-spam products.
Stopping spam is not simple, and there are no
20.10.2009 17:27, RW kirjoitti:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:14 +0300
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I have tried to compile spamd for cygwin,
but could not make it. I would have used it as one spamd instance in
my LAN in addition to the working Linux ones,
spamd is perl, it's
20.10.2009 17:44, McDonald, Dan kirjoitti:
whitelist_from *...@enerquimica.com
whitelist_from should generally be avoided. find out if these senders
have published an spf record, or use DKIM signing, then use
whitelist_from_spf or whitelist_from_dkim instead of whitelist_from
IMO
20.10.2009 18:43, RW kirjoitti:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:12:21 +0300
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
20.10.2009 17:27, RW kirjoitti:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:14 +0300
Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi wrote:
I have tried to compile spamd for cygwin,
but could not make it. I would
18.10.2009 2:22, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson quoted himself (both on the 17th):
I have not yet analysed what whitehats cause this, but this rule seems
suspipicious to me at moment.
Now I have. Legitimate bulk mailers.
From: NYTimes.comnytdir...@nytimes.com
From
15.10.2009 22:43, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
A score of 6 is FREAKISHLY high, even for something with a very low FP
rate. I'd score that around 1.2 if I trusted it. I like it, so I'm
throwing it in khop-general as MC_TAB_IN_FROM scoring at 0.6 for now:
# @Mike Cappella on sa-users, 20090806
I have not yet analysed what whitehats cause this, but this rule seems
suspipicious to me at moment.
At the bright side: HOSTKARMA is a pleasant thing to have, now that my
config is fixed with the community aid.
Email: 1280 Autolearn: 765 AvgScore: 13.53 AvgScanTime: 11.23 sec
Spam: 632
17.10.2009 3:12, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
I have not yet analysed what whitehats cause this, but this rule seems
suspipicious to me at moment.
Now I have. Legitimate bulk mailers.
From: NYTimes.com nytdir...@nytimes.com
From: Iltalehti.fi iltalehti-288-d690018e-1000350
15.10.2009 8:48, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
iki.fi is a famous Finnish email forwarding service and as such should be
added as internal_networks, if you are using it. Things like this are
hard
to know unless you really understand TruthPaths..
All right. I removed internal_networks which
It seems that SpamAssassin attaches the Date header from the original
(attached) email when it creates the announcement email.
Would it be better to create a new current Date for the new email? The
idea here is to fix forged Date, as it often is. I sort my mail with
Date, and hate when the
15.10.2009 18:38, Jason Haar kirjoitti:
I just received what appeared to be a standard certain north american
country pharma spam that went straight by rules I have that normally
catch it. Within Thunderbird (and any other HTML-capable MUA) it's
blatantly shouting its wares. Clever usage of
14.10.2009 19:17, R-Elists kirjoitti:
All I can say is that if these numbers were real or typical I
would be out of business.
perkel,
i might be wrong, yet it doesnt appear to me that Jari have enough mail
volume to have a reasonable statistical base...
- rh
You are not wrong,
14.10.2009 19:52, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Eduardo Casarero wrote:
2009/10/14 Rick Knight rick_kni...@rlknight.com
mailto:rick_kni...@rlknight.com
With the help of people here, I have gotten DCCIFD working. Now I
have another question. Should I use DCCIFD with DCCPROC or instead
of DCCPROC?
14.10.2009 20:33, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not find the original. Many
scripts with the same name though..
I put that to my server as
14.10.2009 20:50, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
which works for me (Debian), the script not runs without arguments.
*now* runs. (s/not/now/g)
--
http://www.iki.fi/jarif/
Q: How many WASPs does it take to change a light bulb?
A: One.
pgpEguqewsBA6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
14.10.2009 20:51, Karsten Bräckelmann kirjoitti:
On Wed, 2009-10-14 at 13:44 -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
However, the single point of failure is your router -- assuming you
actually are using its DNS.
It's entirely possible his ISP is intercepting his DNS
14.10.2009 20:57, Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti:
If I'm not mistaken, it is always good to run a local nameserver when
using SpamAssassin anyway, and not use any router for that.
This is how I have it, I have a local bind, and OpenDNS as forwarders.
And a special zone like
14.10.2009 21:48, Benny Pedersen kirjoitti:
On Wed 14 Oct 2009 07:57:35 PM CEST, Jari Fredriksson wrote
This is how I have it, I have a local bind, and OpenDNS as forwarders.
dont put all eggs in one basket :)
(remove opendns forwards in bind)
after i learned bind more i found that its
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could not find the original. Many
scripts with the same name though..
I put
14.10.2009 22:45, Bowie Bailey kirjoitti:
I have several virtual users and I want them to all use the same Bayes
DB (and user_prefs, etc). The are all using the same UID/GID. Is it
safe to make all of the $HOME/spamassassin directories symlinks to a
common directory? I can't think of a
14.10.2009 23:55, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
14.10.2009 21:49, Mike Cardwell kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Jari,
How did you produce the great looking statistics?
Thanks,
Rick
It's a perl script called sa-stats.pl
I tried not google it for you, but could
14.10.2009 23:55, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari,
Thanks again for putting the script up. I found the original site and
downloaded the 3.1 version. In the instructions it says If your top 5
does not contain URIBL_BLACK, see http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml;. On
my system URIBL_BLACK is number
15.10.2009 0:21, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Here's the url for the newer version
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt;.
It's not newer, it's exactly the same version, without or later additions.
Please to not reply to my INBOX, I get confused. My Thunderbird sees
your
15.10.2009 0:42, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
15.10.2009 0:21, Rick Knight kirjoitti:
Here's the url for the newer version
http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt;.
It's not newer, it's exactly the same version, without or later
additions.
Please
15.10.2009 6:41, Adam Katz kirjoitti:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
3.0 RCVD_IN_BRBL_RELAY RBL: received via a relay rated as poor by
Barracuda
[187.10.243.78 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
Hmm, a different IP.
...
Any chance your internal and
15.10.2009 4:33, Karsten Bräckelmann kirjoitti:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:44 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
-1.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: HostKarma: relay in white list (first pass)
[212.16.98.53 listed in
hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]
$ host 212.16.98.53
15.10.2009 3:37, Marc Perkel kirjoitti:
TOP HAM RULES FIRED
--
RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
--
1 RCVD_IN_JMF_W 1115 6.88 0.06 74.98
This
15.10.2009 8:29, Henrik K kirjoitti:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 03:33:54AM +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 02:44 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
-1.0 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WRBL: HostKarma: relay in white list (first pass)
[212.16.98.53 listed
Email: 911 Autolearn: 603 AvgScore: 13.10 AvgScanTime: 12.16 sec
Spam: 462 Autolearn: 414 AvgScore: 33.17 AvgScanTime: 10.80 sec
Ham:449 Autolearn: 189 AvgScore: -7.55 AvgScanTime: 13.55 sec
Time Spent Running SA: 3.08 hours
Time Spent Processing
This looks worrying. I have it at 2.2 pts, and not caused any false positives,
but still, odd. Or is it? I know it is a SPAM indicator but a bulk indicator.
But it is triggered for example by some mailing list posts which are genuine
and not bulk.
Is someone trying to poison DCC?
sa-stats:
Auto correct: That should be 'I know it is *not* a spam
indicator but a bulk indicator.'
Correct ;)
You have to whitelist the mailing list in the dcc
whiteclnt file.
Ok, have to learn something new here. I have whiteclnt now in my vi as a
starting point.
Thanks all for your
Auto correct: That should be 'I know it is *not* a spam
indicator but a bulk indicator.'
Correct ;)
You have to whitelist the mailing list in the dcc
whiteclnt file.
Ok, have to learn something new here. I have whiteclnt
now in my vi as a starting point.
Thanks all for your
Is someone trying to poison DCC?
Yes, you are(:-) If you haven't whitelisted the
mailing list then
you are reporting the email from the mailing list to DCC,
which will
increase the DCC count.
Me? But I do report to DCC/Razor2/SpamCop only spam. I do not report ALL my
email.
From: Jari Fredriksson ja...@iki.fi
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:25:15 +0300
Is someone trying to poison DCC?
Yes, you are(:-) If you haven't whitelisted the
mailing list then
you are reporting the email from the mailing list to
DCC, which will
increase
DCC identifies mail that has been sent often. That's what
the rule checks for, if other recipients have seen it,
too.
You voluntarily installed DCC, knowing SA will use it.
This was on your discretion, and it's your duty to
evaluate if it actually is, what you want.
[1] Once, mind
Thank you all guys, on list and especially off list.. You know who you are.
Thanks. I Put this to the list because I have certain difficulties to write a
letter to each of you separately.
Thanks.
Spamassassin Version 3.2.5
I am curious if it is possible to rewrite the subject
based on the value of the score. A example of this would
be if a score of 4.0 was given the subject would state
[Potential Spam], but if it was 5.0-10.0 then it is
[SPAM] if it was greater then 10.0 it would
Keep getting similar obvious (to me) spam - tuning
recommendations? My threshold is torqued down to 3.5
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=3.5
tests=BAYES_50,RAZOR2_CHECK, SPF_HELO_PASS,US_DOLLARS_3
autolearn=no version=3.2.4
Please don't send spam to the list.
We have been running Spamassassin for maybe eight years
now. But, my coworkers do not like OpenSource. So they
have finally complained enough that my boss is going to
replace our reliable FreeBSD/Spamassassin boxes. They
are planning on purchasing something that runs ON
Exchange. What a
Some just mentioned sa-stats.pl statistics, and I then wrote a script for me to
post daily stats for me into email.
This is not nuclear science, but I still share it.
It is HTML formatted because I use Outlook Express to read mail, but it is easy
to fix
The file is named so that it runs
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 20:45 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Sendmail command is available with sendmail and postfix
emailers, dunno about others.
You don't need to use sendmail: if the cron job writes
anything to stdout (or stderr) this is automatically
mailed to root.
If you'd rather
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/
If you are capable of processing your mail nightly in
cron, why don't you join the nightly mass check? You can
help to test the rules and make the sa-update channel
better. We especially need non-English ham in the
nightly masscheck.
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/
If you are capable of processing your mail nightly in
cron, why don't you join the nightly mass check? You can
help to test the rules and make the sa-update channel
better. We especially need non-English ham in the
nightly masscheck.
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 21:33 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 20:45 +0300, Jari Fredriksson
wrote:
Sendmail command is available with sendmail and postfix
emailers, dunno about others.
You don't need to use sendmail: if the cron job writes
anything to stdout
On Fri, 2009-10-02 at 23:28 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
There is a blank line between Content-Type and Hello,
but the Content-Type line WILL get to the body, and the
html gets injected after it as raw html code, not as
html (because the actual content type will be text not
html).
Cron
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 00:03 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
This is something that I have no knowledge.
It was a surprise to me too!
Could you see the source format of the mail? I can't
think anything except it being in HTML format, as there
is no AFAIK no other formats for rich text
It seems that people have already been using the rules
copied from your site. It will be confusing to them if
we change the official name. Some will accidentally have
your lists twice.
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BL Black
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_WL White
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_YL Yellow
RCVD_HOSTKARMA_BR Brown
On tir 29 sep 2009 23:30:15 CEST, Warren Togami wrote
Could you please decide between the existing JMF rule
names or the above proposed HOSTKARMA names? It seems
opinions are split here.
let it be the long names that loose ?
ironical you wanted to be shurt names but created a
longer
Hello
if I restarted the spamd
You need more words when communicating ;)
Does this mean the report still does not show up, even if you restarted SA
after the setting?
Well. SpamAssassin does not have a Quarantine. Something in your system has,
and that is what is calling the
I ran this command:
ALTER TABLE bayes_seen ADD lastupdate timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP;
It chugged for ~1.5N rows and the result is that all of the lastupdate
fields
have a value of 0's. All new lastupdate columns get set to the current
time
dears Srs,
I have added the option report_safe 1, but the mail
deposited in the quarantine folder
not have any attached and SA report
Do not use the amavis, if not the simscan
Did you restart Spamd after the change?
24.9.2009 21:55, Kris Deugau wrote:
Steven W. Orr wrote:
The questions is this: I thought that InnoDB was going
to consume *more* resources because the purpose of it was to support
transactions. Am I wrong? If I convert to a higher rev of MySQL and
get InnoDB
will I get *better*
24.9.2009 23:57, LuKreme kirjoitti:
On 24-Sep-2009, at 13:46, Jorn Argelo wrote:
Using InnoDB is absolutely vital and you cannot use MyISAM at all
from my experience. My bayes_token table is 12 million rows and
increasing every day, and performance is still just fine.
Is there a
On 23.09.09 00:04, Steven W. Orr wrote:
Every so often, I see some large MySQL accesses taking
place from SA. Is there any regular maintenance needed
or should I just leave it alone?
It depends on what you use mysql for. IF you store bayes
and AWL databases there, you need bayes
Hi out there,
Sep 22 15:17:17 web14 amavis[21065]: SA info: config:
failed to parse line, skipping, in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/teltarifregeln.cf: rawbodyfull
X_SMALLFONTLONGTEXT
/FONT\\s+(FACE=[^]*\\s)?size=?1?(br|p|\\/p|[^]|\\r|\\n){160}/is
but all this rules worked fine on the old
301 - 400 of 669 matches
Mail list logo
