n't see any other reference in the
> docs...
See perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf, "LEARNING OPTIONS"
use_bayes 0
(default is 1)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
king on a Bayes write? Try disabling Bayes
temporarily. If that fixes it, move to a SQL-based Bayes instead of DBM.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
something.de
> Status: connect
>
> Connection closed by foreign host.
>
> The WHOIS server for .de is not RFC compliant
I agree
> Whether some whois clients decide to cater to whatever broken syntax
.de has decided to
> use is immaterial.
I agree here too
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Kenneth Porter wrote:
>> Alternatively, is there regex syntax to match all patterns *except*
>> the one given? Can I somehow express "all geocities.com subdomains
>> except www and uk" as a regex?
>
> That is a bit trickier because Perl does not currently support
> variable l
reaks this. To paraphrase Animal Farm:
.{0,50}?> and [^>]{0,50}> are functionally equivalent... except when a
non-backtracking quantifier is in effect.
> So either that non-backtracking qualifier is the fly in the whole
> ointment or I'm misunderstanding what it means.
.
.{0,50}?> and [^>]{0,50}> are functionally equivalent.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> a{m,n} matches any string of at least m and at most n copies of "a".
> a{m} is a shortcut for a{m,m}
> a{m,} has no upper bound on the length
> a{,n} is a typo, sorry. Should be a{0,n}.
> a+ is a shortcut for a{1,}
> a* is a shortcut for a{0
rtcut for a{0,}
All of these are greedy by default. Putting the ? after them means they match
the shortest possible string, rather than the longest.
So .{0,50} means "zero to fifty characters of any kind"
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispani
How about this:
full FloatingTags3 /(?>>\s?[\$%A-Z0-9]\s?<.{,50}?){90}/is
This caps the . at 50, and stops looking after it finds 90 of the groups.
I'm a little confused as to why you're using (?>>...) instead of (?:...)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com
f repeats at a reasonable level.
.* # DON'T USE
.+ # DON'T USE
.{1,17} # for some value of 17
.{n,n+17} # for some values of n and 17
This really helps performance.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Chris Edwards wrote:
>
> /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -u nobody
>
> I get these errors...
>
> [24001] warn: unix dgram connect: Socket operation on non-socket at
> /usr/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/Mail/SpamAssassin/Logger/Syslog.pm line 79
> [24001] error: no connection to syslog available at
> /usr/perl5/
Steven Stern wrote:
> Everything's tweaked to use "root" as the user.
... you've got to ask yourself a question: Do I feel lucky?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
own,
> but you'd have to Google for the SA one
Alternately you could install MIMEDefang, which is a milter that calls ClamAV
and SpamAssassin directly.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Roger Taranto wrote:
> The reason I ask is that my dad's SPF record is listed as ~all for his
> externally-visible static IP address, but when machines internal to
> his network connect to send mail, they look forged since they have a
> 192.168 address. Suggestions?
Bypass SPF checking on
* mail
Dan wrote:
> Wow,
>
> I must be confusing this with any/all is/isn't. In various software
> (mail scripts, iTunes smart playlists, etc):
>
> any IS IS IS IS
>
> equals
>
> all NOT NOT NOT NOT
Exactly backwards.
any(@criteria) = not all(not @criteria)
Consider
Lifeboat1-ha
David Flanigan wrote:
> Do most people run SA or something similar on there secondary MX
> servers?
Speaking for myself, my two MX servers are configured identically and have
equal MX weight.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Busine
> Geocities! All I've been doing is submitting damn redirect web pages.
One thing Geocities isn't doing is adding a "report abuse" link to their
javascript widget that appears on every page. That would turn every visitor
into a potential spamfighter.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
David Flanigan wrote:
> On Tue, 2 May 2006 10:04:47 -0700, Matthew.van.Eerde wrote
>> David Flanigan wrote:
>>> Since a inordinate % of spam seems to go through my secondary MX, I
>>> have been treating it as being outside of my trusted_network
>>
>> "T
David Flanigan wrote:
> Since a inordinate % of spam seems to go through my secondary MX, I have been
> treating it as being outside of my trusted_network
"Trusted" means you trust it to tell the truth. Your secondary MX should be
part of your trusted network.
--
Matth
an encrypted
archive to come up with possible passwords.
That's when you start getting viruses in emails that say "The password is
Mickey Mouse's girlfriend's name."
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
wrote:
> Is BitDefender stable?
I haven't had any troubles with it. It's free, but not open source... and most
importantly the virus definitions are updated regularly.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./Hire
wrote:
> I can say that the best, and most affordable, anti-virus package I
> have ever used was RAV. Until is was bought out by Microsoft. I
> have since been using ClamAV but it sure uses allot of RAM.
I use both ClamAV and BitDefender's free Linux product
http://www.bitdefender.com/bd/s
bers of our organization to use these sites to
send links to each other.
On our MX gateways, we check SPF and reject any that fall into -all.
Roaming users connect via SMTP AUTH to a non-MX mail server.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business
Christophe Journel wrote:
> I use spamassassin 3.0.3.. but my pb is : it's sloww :(
Disable network tests. If that helps install a caching name server.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
com/inquiry/gmail_security2
DK and SPF are very useful in proving accountability for email sent.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
\D?0\D?6\D?9\D?8\D?4\D?0\D?1\D?0\D?6|3\D?3\D?8\D?3\D?5\D?7\D?9|2\D
?0\D?6\D?3\D?3\D?8\D?6\D?0\D?6\D?1|2\D?0\D?6\D?2\D?0\D?2\D?2\D?0\D?3\D?3
/
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
easonable, though:
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/menus/demo.html
(doesn't work in IE 6, but works fine in Firefox, Safari, IE 7b2pr...)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
that makes much more sense :)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
rewards CPU and bandwidth spent* is playing into the hands
of the spammers.
* Email stamps, "factor this product of large primes" challanges, greetpause....
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
mouss wrote:
> I would conjecture that most legitimate mail has two "real" hops (the
> sending MTA and the receiving MTA).
That would be one hop.
string and NOT at internal newlines.
You can get the behavior you want by using the /m modifier:
header L_INCOMPETENT4ALL =~ /\\r\\n\s?$/m
or by specifying [\s\n] as a class:
header L_INCOMPETENT5ALL =~ /\\r\\n[\s\n]?/
$ perl -e 'print "a\nb" =~ /a$/
er, which can be used to add headers at the top... it calls
libmilter's smfi_insheader function, which allows specifying a position to
insert the header.
I've tried to convince clamav-milter to add a similar option, without success.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com
(acknowledge & reject message)
> or
>bogus_user DISCARD (drops message)
I do
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]RELAY
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]RELAY
...
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]RELAY
To:example.tld ERROR:5.1.1:"550 User unknown"
(Enumerate Goodness)
--
Matthew.van.Ee
Assassin returns, the original may have headers appended to
it (X-Spam-Status, etc.) -- or the mail might be discarded, tempfailed, or
rejected.
It might, in theory, be possible for a clever user to be able to infer that
someone was BCC'd under certain circumstances... for example, i
s stores the list of recipients)
Caveat... this only adds the recipients the MTA knows about. If something is
BCC'd to an ungodly number of recipients, the MSA will usually send it in
several MAIL FROM commands. The MTA will only know about the recipients for
the current MAIL FROM command.
le you
can set to 1 in mimedefang-filter for this.
I assume SpamAssassin uses this header?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Tristan Miller wrote:
> debug: is DNS available? 0
What is the output of
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
abeas.com/
Spam Fighter Habeas Wins One
http://www.clickz.com/news/article.php/3336631
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
the
>> same overhead as any other TCP socket.
>
> ...named pipes?
Ooh, good one. UNIX has named pipes too... but Windows named pipes are closer
to UNIX domain sockets than they are to UNIX named pipes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Named_Pipes
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com
s rule name description
> --
> --
> -1.4 ALL_TRUSTEDPassed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
> 1.3 MISSING_SUBJECTMissing Subject: header
You can probably set that up in local.cf with
clear_report_template
report _TESTS
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>> unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in
>> disjoint jails
>
> Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount
> --bind?
/me comes to his senses
Of course you can
mouss wrote:
> unix sockets can't be used if the client and the server are in disjoint jails
Really? Not even with symlinks (can you symlink a socket) or mount --bind?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com
ain sockets. The closest thing to
it would be a TCP server listening on 127.0.0.1 and only accepting connections
from 127.0.0.1 - but that has the same overhead as any other TCP socket.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
> Is spamd running?
>
> A most excellent question! =)
> How do I find out?
ps -ax | grep spamd
(ignore any lines that contain "grep spamd")
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] log]# /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin status
> spamd is stopped
That works to
uldn't think you should train the filter with the markup in it
> that it can key off of. Is that right
SpamAssassin will ignore its own markup when training Bayes.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> When automatically set, yes. When you manually define your
> trusted/internal networks, no -- you really get to define them.
OK, that makes sense.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDi
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> You might as well through in trusted_networks 127.0.0.1
... that's not hardcoded?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
assin/attachment.cgi?id=3312
Oops. That's what I get for linking to the attachment rather than the bug.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
i?id=3210
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
, I should probably note
C:\custom-path>ls /b
alias.bat
cat.bat
cp.bat
less.bat
ls.bat
man.bat
mv.bat
rm.bat
xargs.bat
C:\custom-path>type man.bat
@echo off
help %*
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
:SpamAssassin::Plugin::DomainKeys
in your init.pre or v310.pre
Also make sure you have Mail::DomainKeys installed
There is also a patch you need to make it work with 3.1.0
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
7;s fine. That just means we can't distinguish
legitimate mail from that business vs. spoofed mail from that business based on
the sending relay.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> pass: 467
> none: 3297
> softfail: 139
> fail: 106
> error: 2
Oops, forgot "neutral"
none: 3357
pass: 486
neutral: 91
softfail: 140
fail: 110
error: 2
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Busine
my domain
publishes a "-all" record, and the most-frequently-spoofed domain for mail I
receive is my own.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
se backtracking shouldn't be possible, the
> meta should actually be a little slower than the single regex.
Exactly.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Jeremy Fairbrass wrote:
> What's the difference? Your meta rule is fundamentally identical to
> Loren's rule, is it not?!
They are identical, yes. Loren brought up .* as a potential red flag, and I
suggested a way to avoid it.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com
Subject =~ /^Re:\s/i
header _SUBJECT_ENDSWITH_NEWS Subject =~ /\bnews$/i
meta SUBJECT_IS_RE_NEWS (_SUBJECT_STARTSWITH_RE && _SUBJECT_ENDSWITH_NEWS)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
> Is there ever a legit reason to Base64 encode plain text?
Microsoft Outlook Web Access for Exchange Server 2000 base64-encodes plain text.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.
Duane Hill wrote:
> Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
>> delete from bayes_(token|seen|expire) where id in
>> (select id from bayes_vars where username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]');
>
> Cool! I haven't gotten too deep yet into MySQL. I knew there was a
> shorter way of
seen|expire) where id in
(select id from bayes_vars where username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]');
The awl deletion can be simplified too:
delete from awl where username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
is
> allowed to
> relay mail through the mailserver. (either via an entry in the access
> database, or because the IP or machine name matches a line in
> /etc/mail/relay_domains.
Couldn't you just copy the access/relay_domains hosts over to your
trusted_networks config?
--
ed' to source mail for "artesyncp.com".
>
> Aye; thanks. Unfortunately, our current external DNS server doesn't
> yet support SPF records. =(
Your DNS server doesn't support TXT records??
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Xavier Sudre wrote:
> I read that an SPF aware smtp server should introduce the Received-SPF
> header in the email headers.
There are patches for Postfix to support SPF... for example:
http://www.ipnet6.org/postfix/spf/
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.455
Xavier Sudre wrote:
> Is there a way to get spamassassin record a Recevied-SPF header in the
> email headers?
Only MTAs can add headers.
Xavier Sudre wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/EnvelopeSenderInHeaders
>
> My postfix version is compatible.
Is there a Return-Path header on the file that spamc is told to scan?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 80
f postfix?
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/EnvelopeSenderInHeaders
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
cf andlocate
>> user_prefs this will tell you all of the files and you can check them
>
> Tried that
...
> Any other ideas?
grep the source of VHCS for spamassassin or required_score?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> James Smith wrote:
>> On running 'spamassassin -D --lint' it claims to use those config
>> files, and does indeed (as shown by the TEST_E at the end of the
>> output) but it must be using diferent configs when invoked from the
>> mai
in this list, and only
> requires a score of 4 wheras this output is requiring 5 as it
> should...
It must be that VHCS is invoking SpamAssassin in some fashion that ignores
local.cf. How does VHCS invoke SpamAssassin?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.455
if there are new
> versions available for download - complete with logging and optional
> email reports. Works very well for me - I'd be happy to make it
> available if anyone was interested...
Sounds like good wikifood.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.
Marc Dufresne wrote:
> I think it was Steve that said his database is in SQL format. How do I
> convert the spamassassin database on FreeBSD 5.4 to SQL?
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BetterDocumentation/SqlReadmeBayes
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.455
ss. The worst they could be
accused of is slander.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
y $object = spam_assassin_init(@_);
return undef unless $object;
}
return $SASpamTester->parse([EMAIL PROTECTED]);
} else {
return Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit->new(data=>[EMAIL PROTECTED]);
}
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
where... ;)
BerkeleyDB uses sparse files.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
ject of
Subject: Left-Handed Elvis Impersonator Conference ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
marked as spam.
Well... I suppose you could require AOL users to put down a deposit every time
they subscribe to a list...
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
as
to send to, and the other embedded in the link sent in the reply.
The tokens are not connected in any predictable fashion.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
res off a reply:
"One final step remaining. Please click this link to verify your registration."
If AOL complains about that reply, you pull up your logs and ask them "how
could it be spam when THEY emailed ME first??"
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
hen
you can rely on being able to extract the AOL address from any TOS reports in
response to mail you forward.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
ry instance of the AOL members mail
> address from the attach message with [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
? Not true. The TOS notices include the AOL member's email address
unobfuscated.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> FWIW, the new Windows Live Mail Beta service uses SpamAssassin.
Er, wait, no it doesn't. Never mind. I was misreading the headers.
Clickability uses SpamAssassin. They power CNN's "Email this story" tool. I
had sent myself a CNN story to a
e new Windows Live Mail Beta service uses SpamAssassin.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
7;s Clickability send-to-friend tool still uses the visitor's email as MAIL
FROM:, which breaks SPF.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
then your point is accurate, and the rules should be re-scored.
Otherwise the rules are fine.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
-q -m 2
Try adding a -D to the init.d spamd call and see if it gives you any more info
on why it's failing.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Unfortunately, that's not likely to change, as there's more than just
> this list hosted on the apache list server. The other lists benefit
> greatly from the filter.
There's no way to bypass spam-checking based on the envelope-recipient?
-
> Not entirely. The list has a higher than default threshold.
I too had missed that the bounce was from the list server. GTUBE idea
withdrawn.
10.0, as I see from the X-ASF-Spam-Status header.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Evan Platt wrote:
> IIRC, the list runs spamassassin and would block your message before
> it would make it to the list members.
... which kind of defeats Chris's point.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com
Chris Santerre wrote:
> Come on guys. You can't spam filter a list that talks about spam.
> Expect to see examples posted. Either stop filtering this list, or
> unsubscribe.
(must fight back evil ideas of sending a GTUBE to the list...)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde
Ed Russell wrote:
> 1.Does anyone have an opinion as to what RBL to contact? I know
> there are quite a few.
openrbl.org has a reasonably comprehensive list.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
eceived: headers are by trustworthy servers.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Randy Smith wrote:
> Then I run spamc like so:
>
> spamc -s 512000 -u $RECIPIENT
>
> $RECIPIENT is set by my MTA and is replaced with the user's account
> name.
>
> [snip]
What do you do for mail with multiple recipients?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.c
figure your server to skip SpamAssassin checks on email received
by trusted sources (SMTP AUTH, POP-before-SMTP, internal networks,
what-have-you)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
s.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4623
(bug, patch attached)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
.2 and review your configuration -- a lot
changed between 2.* and 3.*
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> Yusuf Ahmed wrote:
>> SCENARIO: I am the owner of "sample.com.au". I have email accounts
>> named "info" and "joeblow", therefore their email addresses would be
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> PROB
uld probably REJECT mail to invalid addresses at RCPT TO time.
This will allow people who are legitimately trying to send you mail at a
mistyped address to receive an undeliverable report, rather than assuming the
message went through.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.45
etation is that 22.74% of mail is "HTML spam", and 22.34%
of mail is "HTML ham".
Adding the two together, 45.08% of mail matches HTML_MESSAGE (for this sample
data.)
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
result in a DATA so
there's nothing to spam-scan. If these are counted in %ofmail, but not in
%ofspam or %ofham, that would explain the apparent discrepancy.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
70% of spam is HTML, and 55% of ham is HTML?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
1 - 100 of 301 matches
Mail list logo
