Re: RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS and "deep headers"

Hello, May I kindly ask you all discuss this off-list? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 "Die Verkaufsschlager des Buchmarkts geben Auskunft über den Zustand einer Gesellschaft bzw. sind, was diese Zeiten a

Re: Can your bayes do this?

now. Not Bayesian > > -- > Marc Perkel - Sales/Support > supp...@junkemailfilter.com > http://www.junkemailfilter.com > Junk Email Filter dot com > 415-992-3400 Some how all this thread smells as advertisement for some company, or is it only me, who feels this?

Re: bayes problem?

El día Thursday, December 17, 2015 a las 11:47:50AM +0100, Reindl Harald escribió: > > Am 17.12.2015 um 10:54 schrieb Matthias Apitz: > > Since some days (I think(!) after I run 'sa-update') a lot of technical > > mails are declared as SPAM due to BAYES_99 (99-100%

sa-learn from mails which passed SA

ens of the lines of SA Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

bayes problem? (was: Re: feed spamassassin with a catch-all address)

gt; rh.debug The results are here http://www.unixarea.de/SA/rh.mail http://www.unixarea.de/SA/rh.out http://www.unixarea.de/SA/rh.debug Can some kind soul help me please having a look what is now wrong with my bayes ? Thanks in advance matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de,

missing Mail/SpamAssassin/CompiledRegexps/body_0.pm

there could be some other reason. Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

pts rule name description -- -- 1.0 NO_RDNS_FOR_LAST_EXTERNAL DNS: Last External really has no rdns -4.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

27;check_dsn_rdns', ^^ > 'check_dns_sender', > ]; > > @@ -373,6 +374,25 @@ > } > } > > +sub check_dns_rdns { ^^ -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

ge $packet->... by $pkt-> ...) but it gives the following warning when I run it through -tD: nov 25 08:12:51.207 [2017] warn: rules: failed to run NO_RDNS_FOR_LAST_EXTERNAL RBL test, skipping: nov 25 08:12:51.207 [2017] warn: (Can't locate object method "check_dns_rdns" via package "Mail: [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.16/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/Check.pm line 271.) Why I do miss? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

open Internet again and send all answers out upstream at once; do you get my point? > if i would be you i would rop the ISP, point the MX to a cheap > VPS and install my own MTA + Postscreen + SpamAssassin + IMAP there what is a VPS? matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

he reason RDNS_NONE is triggered for *every* mail Exactly. I was asking me (and the list) why all got RDNS_NONE fired, and now we know it: ISP's fault. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

y it would be not a "outgoing DNS request" because it's cached > > it's obvious that the info is missing in the header, otherwise for a > remote IP with no PTR on that place would appear "unknown" so you can > even fire that DNS request only when it is ne

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

El día Tuesday, November 24, 2015 a las 11:30:31AM +0100, Benny Pedersen escribió: > Matthias Apitz skrev den 2015-11-24 11:22: > > > As I get all my mails with this missing rDNS symbol in the Received: > > line, I have only two options: unconfigure the RDNS_NONE test or

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

line, I have only two options: unconfigure the RDNS_NONE test or change the ISP. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

e without RDNS_NONE. It's total clear: a fault in the MX of my ISP. I contacted them already yestarday, until now without any reaction. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

id 1a0rRx-0006CK-Gq for g...@unixarea.de; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:46:33 +0100 has something todo with my local configuration? ms-10.1blu.de is the front MX of my ISP and is not doing a rDNS for the IP addr 140.211.11.3, or at least is not putting its result in the Receiv

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

rep -i 'DOMIN|GATE' /tmp/apache.d > > honestly *what* do you expect? Honestly, I wanted to see if the above 'meta ...' statement has any effect, it has no visible effect; the same is true, when I set meta RDNS_NONE 0 when I set 'score RDNS_NONE 0', then RDNS_NONE is switched off. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

El día Monday, November 23, 2015 a las 01:38:12PM +0100, Reindl Harald escribió: > Am 23.11.2015 um 13:34 schrieb Matthias Apitz: > > El día Monday, November 23, 2015 a las 01:26:25PM +0100, Benny Pedersen > > escribió: > > > >> its known 2 mta that makes incorrec

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

)) but it still gives always RDNS_NONE matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

El día Monday, November 23, 2015 a las 01:04:07PM +0100, Benny Pedersen escribió: > Matthias Apitz skrev den 2015-11-23 10:43: > > > meta RDNS_NONE (__RDNS_NONE && !__CGATE_RCVD && !__DOMINO_RCVD) > > meta RDNS_NONE (__RDNS_NONE && !(__

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

> > Received: from [140.211.11.3] (helo=mail.apache.org) > by ms-10.1blu.de with smtp (Exim 4.76) > (envelope-from > ) > id 1a0c7H-0003WU-3m > for g...@unixarea.de; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 22:24:11 +0100 > ____ >

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

//wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/RDNS_NONE > > RDNS_NONE checks more than just the PTR (reverse) DNS record. > It really should be named FCRDNS_NONE Then the wiki is wrong. header __RDNS_NONE X-Spam-Relays-External =~ /^[^\]]+rdns= / header __DOMINO_RCVD Received =~ /by \S+ \(Lotus Domino / header __CGATE_RCVD Received =~ /by \S+ \(CommuniGate Pro/ meta RDNS_NONE (__RDNS_NONE && !__CGATE_RCVD && !__DOMINO_RCVD) -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

p=140.211.11.3 rdns= " you can find the full -D output of such a mail here: http://www.unixarea.de/apache.d.txt matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

n with * 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS Maybe it's the SA version, mine is 3.4.0, yours 3.4.1? matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

El día Monday, November 23, 2015 a las 10:23:26AM +0200, Jari Fredriksson escribió: > On 23.11.2015 8.54, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > El día Sunday, November 22, 2015 a las 09:23:40PM +, RW escribió: > >>> https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Rules/RDNS_NONE > >>

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

.211.11.3 rdns= " nov 23 07:46:39.203 [1927] dbg: check: tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,RDNS_NONE ... and 140.211.11.3 has a rDNS: $ host 140.211.11.3 3.11.211.140.in-addr.arpa domain name point

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

On Saturday, 21 November 2015 17:40:58 CET, Antony Stone wrote: There is not much I can do when the dynamic IP addr which the ISP gives to me was used for spamming, bots or other bad stuff. True. Which is why running a mail server on a dynamic ISP-assigned IP address will result in a lot o

Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE

Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:35:54 + From: David Jones To: spamassassin-users , Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: question re/ RDNS_NONE Read the Received headers from the bottom up. Thanks for the reply. I did so before sending the question to the list and could not find any IP addr

question re/ RDNS_NONE

Hello, I've sent myself an email which gets marked with RDNS_NONE. Can someone please be so kind and explain to me which IP addr exactly triggers this RDNS_NONE qualification? Thanks in advance. matthias - Forwarded message from Matthias Apitz - X-Spam-Checker-Ve

Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

El día Thursday, November 05, 2015 a las 04:24:04PM +0100, John Wilcock escribió: > Le 05/11/2015 15:54, Matthias Apitz a écrit : > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on c720-r276659 > > X-Spam-Flag: YES &

Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

TP > > * -0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received > > * headers > > ... > > > > Why auto-learn wants the mail as HAM? Again, why it wants to declare the SPAM message as autolearn=ham? matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045

why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

MTP * -0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received * headers ... Why auto-learn wants the mail as HAM? matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ g...@unixarea.de, 🌐 http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045