On 04/25/2018 01:19 PM, Amir Caspi wrote:
On Apr 25, 2018, at 11:08 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
actually, no. it changes to users as needed. This way multiple users can use
spamd with per-user config files.
Sorry, let me be more clear: if spamc is invoked by root, such that spamd would t
On 04/25/2018 04:24 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
spamc connects to spamd, which may run under different user than
spamassassin. That way, different users' settings are used.
check how does your spamd run (which user, if any)
Sorry I should have mentioned that. I was aware of that issue.
I recently setup a new install of an email server on a CentOS 7 server.
Everything is working correctly except for this problem:
>spamassassin --test-mode
Content analysis details: (9.6 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
-
On 11/30/2014 11:50 AM, Dave Pooser wrote:
On 11/30/14 12:34 PM, "Paul R. Ganci" wrote:
So just so I understand something is it expected that those of us with
RHEL 5.11 and RHEL 6.6 servers are expected to upgrade our perl versions
just for spamassassin's sa-update? The whole
On 11/30/2014 04:08 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Sat, 2014-11-29 at 20:39 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
But this effectively means we cannot add new features to SA conditionals
because they might do this to older installs.
Can SA set a $too_old flag to say that that the Perl version number
check f
Loren Wilton wrote:
I predict that the US will be the first country in the 21th century to
abandon English as the national language, while almost all other countries
seem to be mandating that their citizens learn English.
Loren
The problem with the US is that we are linguistic idiots
Matt Kettler wrote:
Regex suggestion: the ^.* at the beginning is pointless. Why force-match the
start of a line, but allow any number of any character immediately following?
/bulk Body=/s will have the exact same matches, and do it faster with less
memory.
Good point.
For optimization sa
I am using DCC-1.3.23 to do greylisting (dccd greylisting server with
the dccm sendmail milter). As a result DCC checksums are performed prior
to the Spamassassin 3.1.0 scan. Therefore rather than repeat the DCC
checks in Spamassassin I have constructed a custom ruleset to perform
the check off
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
[32010] dbg: bayes: unable to initialize database for ganci user,
aborting!
Why can I not "initialize database"? I am running 3.1.0 on a FC1 box
if that matters.
I think the problem is due to an old Postgres. I just discovered that
the Postgres bayes_pg.
I was trying to convert my DBM bayes database to Postgres. I felt I was
following the documention appropriately. I created a user/password
combination. Created a database and then created the tables ala:
psql -U ganci -f bayes_pg.sql ganci_bayes
Then logged in as user ganci I tried to migrate
Alan Premselaar wrote:
perhaps all I am really asking is if there is a way to allow
spamassassin to just stop processing a message that is in a blacklist
to save the cycles? I am not asking for spamassassin to become an
MTA/MDA.
In that case it would be ultimately more efficient to add a rej
Alan Premselaar wrote:
Philosophically, it makes more sense for SpamAssassin to focus on
identifying SPAM, and let another application (MTA, procmail, etc)
focus on what it was primarily designed for: processing
(delivery,rejection,etc) of said email. It's certainly no more of a
hassle to ad
This is somewhat a philosophical question, but I will ask it anyways.
Recent discussions have occurred on this list regarding what
Spamassassin should do with Spam. The recent consensus seems to be that
it is only Spamassassin's job to tag Spam and that some other program
should decide what to
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
I assume this message implies my Bayes database is corrupted and that
is why I keep finding stale lock files. Namely every
bayes_journal_max_size = 102400 Bytes (or whatever unit) the system
attempts to sync the Bayes database which crashes leaving behind the
lock file
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
I am running Spamassassin 3.0.2 on a RaQ 550 using spamd and calling
spamc from procmail. I have found several instances now where the
spamd child is respawned just as it is about to start processing a
message.
Can anybody give me even a wild guess on this one? Believe
Matt Kettler wrote:
Paul R. Ganci wrote:
-rw-rw-rw-1 prganci users 165988 May 14 10:05 bayes_journal
-rw---1 pangione users 34 May 14 10:00 bayes.lock
That's a little troubling.. are you having problems with spamd instances
crashing? The lock is at le
I am running Spamassassin 3.0.2 on a RaQ 550 using spamd and calling
spamc from procmail. I have found several instances now where the spamd
child is respawned just as it is about to start processing a message.
For example check these log entries:
Jun 15 09:11:05 citlatepetl sendmail[547]: j5F
Loren Wilton wrote:
Any hints are graciously accepted and greatly appreciated.
You can't, so far as I know, do exactly what you want. However, you may be
able to come close.
Oh heck. I started the ruleset above, I just finished the thing. File
attached.
Note these rules are UNTESTED, and m
I run the Email servers for a small, rural mountain WISP and have a
situation where all Email 1st comes into a "scrubber" server (RaQ 550)
and once it passes an initial set of virus/spam tests is sent on to a
2nd server (alsa a RaQ 550) where the actual user accounts reside. On
the first server
Matt Kettler wrote:
bayes_auto_expire 0
With this setting you've got a cronjob running sa-learn --force-expire. Right?
Yes.
If not, fix that.
rw-rw-rw-1 prganci users 165988 May 14 10:05 bayes_journal
-rw---1 pangione users 34 May 14 10:00 bayes.lock
That's
I am at my wits end regarding this issue. I am getting very frequent:
May 14 09:58:05 citlatepetl spamd[5125]: Cannot open bayes databases
/home/spam-filter/etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File
exists
messages. From what I have googled I have done just about everything I
could f
21 matches
Mail list logo
