[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Wetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED];
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Messages Not detected as Spam
Paul Wetter wrote:
To answer your questions:
1. I ran spamassassin -t as root.
amavis runs
something? Is this correct?
From what I see my SpamAssassin install is not doing the razor checks.
Thanks in advance.
-Paul
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Wetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED];
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent
Paul Wetter wrote:
Ok, I added what you said. I think things may be back on the up and in
operation. Some spam however is still not detected, which brings me to
my next question.
I have one other question about razor checks. They do not appear to be
working. If I do a manual check
Paul Wetter wrote:
Here is what I get when I reproduce the email:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.002 tagged_above=-1 required=1.5
tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
spamassassin -t gives me this:
Content analysis details: (9.1 points, 2.5 required)
pts rule name
For the last week now I have been receiving
severalvery similar messages that are spam and not being detected as
spam. I have done an sa-learn on every one of them but they still come in
not even being tagged. Is there something wrong with my bayes
detection? Is there any way to log what
I forgot to note thatI have flagged 50+ of
these similar emails. It seems to me that something is not working
correctly.
- Original Message -
From:
Paul
Wetter
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:30
PM
Subject: Messages
[81.121.100.79 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org]
They are very different!
Where do we go from here?
Thanks again!!
-Paul
- Original Message -
From: Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Wetter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April
