Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-09-03 Thread Richard Hobbs
> Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit > http://www.verizonbusiness.com/uk > > -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshiba Research Europe Ltd. - Speech Technology Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.toshiba-europe.com/research/ Tel: +44 1223 376964Mobile: +44 7811 803377

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-30 Thread Richard Hobbs
ssin --lint && echo "Done, now restarting spamd..." && /etc/init.d/spamassassin restart && echo "Done" ========== However, whether there are updates or not, the script still exits - do you know wh

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-30 Thread Richard Hobbs
:/etc/cron.weekly# But, if i remove the "rewrite_subject 1" line, it stops rewriting the subject line (i think)! Any suggestions? Thanks again, Richard. John D. Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Richard Hobbs wrote: > >> Would you guys also recommend putting the command

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-30 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, What does "spamassassin --lint" do? I can't find the lint option in the man page... Thanks again, Richard. John D. Hardin wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Richard Hobbs wrote: > >> Would you guys also recommend putting the command "/usr/bin/sa-update"

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-29 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, Would you guys also recommend putting the command "/usr/bin/sa-update" in the crontab as well? If so, should i be using any particular parameters? And how often should it be run to be worthwhile? Thanks again, Richard. Richard Hobbs wrote: > Hello, > > Thank you

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-29 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, Thank you - this is now done! :-) I shall see how it goes... Richard. Anthony Peacock wrote: > Hi, > > Richard Hobbs wrote: >> Hello, > > >>>> >>>> Is this all correct? >>> Yes. Set up expiration in a cron job, once per day i

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-29 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, Anthony Peacock wrote: > Hi, > > Richard Hobbs wrote: >> Hello, >> >> John D. Hardin wrote: >>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Richard Hobbs wrote: >>> >>>> Could the size of "bayes_seen" and "bayes_toks" be causing this

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, John D. Hardin wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Richard Hobbs wrote: > >> Could the size of "bayes_seen" and "bayes_toks" be causing this timeout? > > Yes. > >> If so, what can i do about this? > > Disable automatic Bayes expiry and do

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, Michael Parker wrote: > Richard Hobbs wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Could the size of "bayes_seen" and "bayes_toks" be causing this timeout? >> > > No, those aren't really that big, but it does look like you have an > expiration p

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
504 2007-08-28 12:52 bayes_toks.expire7925 -rw-r--r-- 1 spamcheck spamcheck 1175 2005-07-20 14:23 user_prefs mail:/home/spamcheck/.spamassassin# == If so, what can i do about this? Thanks again, Richard. Richard Hobbs wrote: > Hello, &

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
would love to do this, but it's not the same messages all the time - in a batch of identical messages, some get through and others cause the hanging. It seems to be completely random. Do you have any other ideas? Thanks again, Richard. -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshi

Re: spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
op it... Any advice greatly appreciated. Thanks again, Richard. Richard Hobbs wrote: > Hello, > > We are running SpamAssassin version 3.1.7-deb running on Perl version > 5.8.4 on a Debian Sarge box with exim4. > > I am usi

spamd keeps running at 99% CPU until i kill the process

2007-08-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
st_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ====== Thanks in advance for any assistance! It's greatly appreciated! Richard. -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshiba Research Europe Ltd. - Speech Technology Group Email: [EMAIL

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-03-01 Thread Richard Hobbs
s > clean, as the network tests which help identify spam won't be used. > > > Adam. > > _ > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Verizon Business Internet Managed > Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit > http:/

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-03-01 Thread Richard Hobbs
;tm=y&search=mortgage_text_links_88_h27f6&disc=y&vers=743&s=4056&p=5117 > > > > _ > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Verizon Business Internet > Managed Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further > information visit http://www.mci.com > > -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshiba Research Europe Ltd. - Speech Technology Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.toshiba-europe.com/research/ Tel: +44 1223 376964Mobile: +44 7811 803377

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
wrong, but this is most likely the case. Also, with regards to --local, what does this do, and how can i actually run it this way? Thanks again, Richard. Gary V wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:26:52 + >> Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, Which startup scripts? There are a lot of them, some of which might call others... am i going to have to trawl through rc3.d or is there an easier way? Thanks again, Richard. Adam Wilbraham wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:20:28 + > Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
it's relevant in terms of getting sa working generally! Thanks again people... i'm going to tackle sa-update again as soon as sa actually works :-) So... any ideas? Thanks again, Richard. Gary V wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 11:26:52 + >> Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
::Country::Fast - Unknown > Razor2::Client::Agent - Unknown > Net::Ident - libnet-ident-perl For the "Unknown" package names, do you have any suggestions? Thanks again, Richard. Bram Mertens wrote: > Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 02/28/20

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
_ > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Verizon Business Internet > Managed Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further > information visit http://www.mci.com > > -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshiba Research Europe Ltd. - Speech Technology Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.toshiba-europe.com/research/ Tel: +44 1223 376964Mobile: +44 7811 803377

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
which has meant only some messages have > been getting through... Again I apologise as I'm probably not the best > person to help solve your issue seeing as I've no experience in the > exim side of things. > > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:59:39 + > Richard Hobbs <

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
braham wrote: > Looks like an exim problem to me, how is exim calling spamc? > Unfortunately I have no exim experience whatsoever (I use qmail / > qmailscanner) but maybe you need to revisit your exim config after the > upgrade... This link may be of use but I'm not sure... > &g

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-28 Thread Richard Hobbs
annel for the SARE rulesets you want. This has been > discussed a lot the last couple of days. > > _____ > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Verizon Business Internet > Managed Scanning Services - power

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-27 Thread Richard Hobbs
m that repository, eg: > > apt-get install -t sarge-backports spamassassin spamc > > Adam. > > > On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:32:39 + > Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Thank you for this... i've added that line to /etc/apt

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-27 Thread Richard Hobbs
spam catching rates due to the ability to run > sa-update. Backports repo is: > > deb http://www.backports.org/debian sarge-backports main contrib non-free > > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:55:40 + > Richard Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello, >>

Re: sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-26 Thread Richard Hobbs
Hello, Is it just as stable? i.e. ours hasn't hung or crashed so far for over 200 days... can you say whether this is true of 3.1 via backports? Also, is there an apt repo for 3.1 for sarge? Thanks again, Richard. John Fleming wrote: > > - Original Message ----- From: &qu

sa-update doesn't exist on my system

2007-02-26 Thread Richard Hobbs
ndering how "sa-update" worked. BUT... the "sa-update" command doesn't seem to exist on my system... any ideas? Thanks in advance, Richard. -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshiba Research Europe Ltd. - Speech Technology Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: htt

RE: Whitelist not working...

2005-08-24 Thread Richard Hobbs
this isn't too much of a concern. Thanks again, Richard. -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshiba Research Europe Ltd. - Speech Technology Group Web: http://www.toshiba-europe.com/research/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1223 376964Mobile: +44 7811 803377 > -

RE: Whitelist not working...

2005-08-18 Thread Richard Hobbs
... Any ideas? Thanks again, Richard. -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshiba Research Europe Ltd. - Speech Technology Group Web: http://www.toshiba-europe.com/research/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1223 376964Mobile: +44 7811 803377 > -Original Message- > From

Whitelist not working...

2005-08-16 Thread Richard Hobbs
vd [EMAIL PROTECTED] domain.co.jp But, they are being ignored. Any ideas? Also, are they case sensitive? i.e. if I always allow [EMAIL PROTECTED] will it block [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well? Thanks in advance, Richard. -- Richard Hobbs (Systems Administrator) Toshiba Research Europe Ltd. - Speech