> -Original Message-
> From: Michelle Konzack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 7:49 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: unsubscribed
>
>
> Hello Steve,
>
> when I subscribed to this Mailinglist I have gotten a
> CONFIRMATION message and a W
te:
>
> >Rob Sterenborg wrote:
> >> Steve Ingraham wrote:
> >>
> >>> I cannot help but comment on this post.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Neither can I.
> >>
> >>
> >>> I am one of those ignorant people th
> -Original Message-
> From: Clay Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:33 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: unsubscribed
>
>
> Steve, I hope you didn't misunderstand me... I AGREE with you! Clay
>
No! My apologies for the misunderstan
> -Original Message-
> From: Clay Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 2:16 PM
> To: Bob Proulx; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: unsubscribed
>
>
> Bob,
>
> I agree and have for a long time. I am always a little taken
> aback when an "unsubs
file descriptor
@400047028615024b1ad4 [19049] warn: prefork: select returned -1!
recovering: Bad file descriptor
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ingraham
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 12:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
users@spamassassin.apache.org
I have a couple of problems that had shown up about a month ago and now
are showing up again yesterday and today in our domain. Many of my
users are reporting quite a few duplicate emails and many are receiving
a great number of spam emails that they were not receiving before.
We are running Qma
> -Original Message-
> From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 7:50 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Fwd: RulesDuJour Run Summary on taz5.fiberhosting.net
>
>
> Daryl, note that a simple update to RDJ to add a time gap
> between individu
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:53:43AM -0600, Steve Ingraham wrote:
> > on this rule it would score higher. Can I change the score
> for that
> > rule? If so, do I just add a line in the local.cf file like so?
> >
> > SARE_ADULT2
On Thursday 09 November 2006 22:14, Steve Ingraham took the opportunity
to
say:
> Ok, I have a question on these Bayes rules related to false positives.
> It appears that many of my users are having legitimate emails scored
in
> the 8 to 9 range. These emails are scoring high basicall
> I have already decreased the Bayes_50_Body rule from 5.0 to 2.5. I
> don't want to decrease the scores with every Bayes rule because I
think
> I will start seeing some true spam delivered because it did not score
> high.
>
> Any ideas?
Daryl wrote:
Don't screw with the bayes scoring that drast
les). Is there something
straightforward that can be done to stop these legitimate scores from
scoring high on the Bayes rules?
I have already decreased the Bayes_50_Body rule from 5.0 to 2.5. I
don't want to decrease the scores with every Bayes rule because I think
I will start seeing some true spam delivered because it did not score
high.
Any ideas?
Steve Ingraham
Steve Ingraham wrote:
>> I am running qmail with spamassassin 3.1.5. I am having a problem
with
>> spamassassin scoring. I have been attempting to change the score for
>> AWL to -25. Here is a header from an email I received a short time
ago
>> with a score of 1
using AWL and why my change to the
local.cf is not having an effect on this score.
Thanks in advance,
Steve
Ingraham
Director of Information Services
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
405 522-5343
>www.rulesemporium.com
Thanks Robert,
I have been so distracted with solving several problems at the same time
it totally slipped my mind that I have been to this site for rules in
the past. It makes a guy feel really stupid when he cannot see the
forest for the trees.
Steve
Peter Lemioux wrote:
>You can modify the scoring of any rule by adding a file to
>/etc/mail/spamassassin that changes the score for specific rules. I
>named mine ZZscores.cf so it will be read after the other files in this
>directory. For instance,
>score HTML_MESSAGE_BODY1.0
Peter Lemieux wrote:
>You don't need to "bump up" the score; this one received an 8.3 which
>exceeds your 5.0 ceiling. This result is that it's tagged as spam. SA
>itself doesn't do anything other than tag likely spams. It's up to you
>to decide what to do with these messages.
>
> [...]
I wa
IL PROTECTED]>
Content-Disposition: inline;
filename="divorcee.gif"
------020701000507010709090301--
Steve
Ingraham
Director of Information Services
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
405 522-5343
ing with my education. I also still
feel the need to have an expert pair of eyes look over my system as I am
not totally convinced that everything is configured properly.
Thanks to everyone for their help,
Steve Ingraham
again. Are
any of the clients remote from the server? (this is where i noted the
problem most, notably on mobile internet devices especially on high
speed trains etc..)
All clients are networked desktop machines. There are no remote
connections.
Steve Ingraham
server.
Steve Ingraham
#x27;t, the problem isn't in your network, it is
in
>his.
You are the second person to reply similarly. As I mentioned I had some
problems a couple of weeks ago that made me concerned about Jake's
inability to dig to my mx record but I do not believe my DNS
configuration is the problem.
Steve Ingraham
n attempting to free up space on it to
see if that may be causing my sporadic email delivery problems.
I am still attempting to figure out what is causing my problems so I
appreciate all advice.
Steve Ingraham
or spamassassin so I get an
error message stating:
Bash: etc/init.d/spamassassin: no such file or directory.
The only way I have been able to restart spamassassin is to restart the
server. If spamassassin is not in /etc/init.d where would it be and how
can I find it?
Thank you,
Steve Ingraham
ion offered on the spam
filtering.
Thanks,
Steve Ingraham
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Ingraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steve Ingraham wrote:
I need help with a problem. Our users are seeing some multiple
duplicate emails coming from the same sender. This i
Steve Ingraham wrote:
I need help with a
problem. Our users are seeing some multiple duplicate emails coming from
the same sender. This is not occurring with every email so there does not
seem to be any pattern to which incoming emails will be duplicated and which
ones won’t. They
update some rules in SA using rules_du_jour
yesterday. Would these rules updates cause this problem? If so,
what would have changed?
Thanks for any help that can be provided.
Steve
Ingraham
Director of Information Services
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
405 522-5343
update some rules in SA using
rules_du_jour yesterday. Would these rules updates cause this
problem? If so, what would have changed?
Thanks for any help that can be provided.
Steve
Ingraham
Director of Information Services
Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
405 522-5343
**”
in the local.cf file below the “rewrite_subject 0” line. I am
not sure why the “report_header 1” and “use_terse_report 1”
lines had been placed in the script but commenting them out did allow the
rules_du_jour script to run.
Thanks for the info.
Steve Ingraham
.
Thanks Adam for the information. I have just pulled up a copy of the
man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf. I cannot see where it details any
information on replacing these lines. I am continuing to search for
this information. Is there specific information I should look for? Any
additional direction on these settings in the local.cf would be
appreciated.
Steve Ingraham
29 matches
Mail list logo
