On 06/23, fchan wrote:
perl Makefile.PL ENABLE_SSL="yes"
'ENABLE_SSL' is not a known MakeMaker parameter name.
Looks like a known bug since December 2009:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6266
It's the first google hit on:Ê
"is not a know
Hi,
I didn't see it posted here but I'm checking if I'm doing something
wrong here trying to enable SSL. Here is the command I entered:
perl Makefile.PL ENABLE_SSL="yes"
and I got this:
What email address or URL should be used in the suspected-spam report
text for users who want more informat
Hello,
I noticed recently (within the past two months) I'm getting this
error message from spamassassin. Here is line from the maillog:
Jan 5 15:07:40 s1 spamd[21160]: check: exceeded time limit in
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Check::_rawbody_tests_0, skipping further
tests
I have set spamd
On 11/12/10 5:38 PM, fchan wrote:
I was trying to do sa-compile -D on my system and I got this error
message: \
first, tell us:
1) version of SA
2) version of re2c
3) what rules, other than stock SA rules do you have
4) what local rules, changes, edits do you have?
5) what operating system
I was trying to do sa-compile -D on my system and I got this error message:
cd /tmp/.spamassassin28731HM9DTNtmp
cd Mail-SpamAssassin-CompiledRegexps-body_0
re2c -i -b -o scanner1.c scanner1.re
re2c -i -b -o scanner2.c scanner2.re
re2c: error: line 85, column 12: unexpected character: 0x1E
What
Dear Sirs,
I have installed SA 3.3.1 with pyzor 0.5.0 on a server with CentOS
4.8, reviewing SA logs shows the following message:
warn: pyzor: check failed: internal error, python traceback seen in response
It should be noted that I recently updated to version 4.7 CentOS 4.8
What is wrong?
I'm recently got some spam with link to bit.ly which I did a Whois
and it appears to MX server for Google/GoogleMail which is from NTT
America, Inc and I'm checking if any other people seen this and if
this could be a compromise of Google or something. Here is an excerpt
of the message with the
I was checking some links today using Whois in a email message and
found this one:
emailfriendz.com
Note the Technical Contact name and his email address. At least he is "honest".
Frank
How do apply an SA patch,
Running SA on FreeeBSD
thx
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Information Technology
Family Care International
588 Broadway Suite 503
New York, NY 10012
Phone:212-941-5300 xt 136
Fax: 212-941-5563
Mailto: jnat...@familycareintl.org
Before you patch any f
I was trying to teach spamassassin 3.3.0 today with a rather large
spam message and I got this error message when I did sa-learn:
Feb 11 14:47:51.262 [5414] info: archive-iterator: skipping large message
The message is 279959 bytes and about 20% is Russian text and other
80% is two gif image a
Hi,
I'm getting alot of this new Google document link spam recently.
Below is an example:
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: fc...@molsci.org
Received: (qmail 11025 invoked by uid 501); 10 Nov 2009 16:55:53 -0800
Received: from 87.217.186.215 by s1.molsci.org (envelope-from
, uid 509) with qmail-scan
Don't tempt them, I already get enough spam not
only from these guys. Also they will flood the
network with smtp useless connections and unless
you have good network attack mitigation system so
you don't have a DDoS, don't tempt them.
Dnia 2009-07-11, sob o godzinie 00:18 +0200, Pawe¸ T«cza pi
I recently was checking on servers that were sending out spam and
found one of them had the hostname called "localhost" which I think
is a attempt to bypass SA. The IP address is 222.252.188.181 which
maps back to Vietnam.
Also I found that a large percentage of my spam comes from Brazil and
I
I'm getting this new spam which they use stacking of words to make a
sentence and I would like make a rule against it. How does
spamassassin handle this type of stuff? Can I use rawbody?
Below is a sample of this:
We're
interested in
hearing your
thoughts on
these articles,
and learning
abo
I was checking the mail logs and noticed this Perl exception error
occasionally:
Jan 28 14:08:26 s1 spamd[2186]: Exception: incomplete data at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS/RR.pm
line 513.
Jan 28 14:08:26 s1 spamd[2186]: caught at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8
Thank you. This is what I needed. Silly of me missing that.
Frank
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:12 -0800, fchan wrote:
I'm having much spam that has html with the common alt test portion.
The http link to where ever and the images always changes so I need
to use the alt text portion of t
, fchan wrote:
http://pastebin.ca/1274188
domain listed in URIBL
--
Benny Pedersen
Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098
I'm having much spam that has html with the common alt test portion.
The http link to where ever and the images always changes so I need
to use the alt text portion of the is html to key off. Below is the
paste link of the html:
http://pastebin.ca/1274188
Thank you,
Frank
"Their back..." the quote form Carol Anne Freeling from the movie
Poltergeist II.
I don't know about you but I seen these spikes in spam today which is
inline what spamcop.net sees:
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamstats
http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek
http://www.spam
Yes I see a drop in total messages and spam and I see similar
results from http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spammonth.
Since they knocked off McColo, my unfortunate neighbors in the San
Francisco Bay Area, my mail server has more disk space since I have
been quarantining certain spam mess
I seen the similar statistics on my mail server. I saw a drop of spam
since this morning which I normally see the daily spike of spam. I
wish this lull in spam will last awhile since my mail server needs a
break :-)
Frank
> SpamCop.net - Total spam report volume:
http://www.spamcop.net/spa
You can set up Barracuda to not to reply to spam which is default
behavior, which I hate. This is the backscatter we all experienced
from Barracuda devices. I set one up for a friend but it does take
awhile to look for the instructions and to get this setting correct
which I don't understand wh
Hi,
Sorry I don't have experience with this product.
I do have limited experience with Barracuda Networks appliance and I
think is a great product for an e-mail filter which I had experienced
with my friend to set up on their network & email server. It is easy
to set up, configure and maintain
I wish that they can modify the High speed
AntiRadiation Missile (HARM) or similar type of
missile from other country and have it find the
bot head (which is real source of the spam and
not bot slaves) the blast them with those.
Obviously, we need to get the hold of the bot
controls and defus
Hi,
What this means there there are more incoming messages than spamd
daemon can handle.
You have you need to change the spamd --max-children to an higher
setting. You need also make sure you system can handle the extra
children processes so not to lock up your system due to an spam
attack. I
On a debian linux system how can all incoming emails be retained
and copies of all emails are forwarded to gmail ?... particulars
include
It appears that you are using sendmail so you can use .forward. Here
are several URL regarding this:
http://www.feep.net/sendmail/tutorial/intro/forward.html
Hi,
Can someone tell me what is the cause of these
"autolearn=unavailable" messages and there is a possible solution. I
get them occasionally but wanted to know why are they appearing.
Below is a sample of the log:
Mar 5 11:42:27 s1 spamd[13422]: spamd: identified spam (110.5/8.0)
for qscan
Hi,
This is similar to what I'm seeing. However I get question marks on
my spam status. Here is a sample header what I'm seeing:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=? required=?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Lorena Aguilar" <[EMAIL P
--max-children setting, consider raising
it" during spam attacks.
Thank you,
Frank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/2008 05:16 PM, fchan wrote:
| Hi,
| I have set my --max-child to 30 but I look at my logs and it appears
| that this is not obeyed.
|
| Here is my spa
Hi,
I have set my --max-child to 30 but I look at my logs and it appears
that this is not obeyed.
Here is my spamd options:
SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -m 30 -H"
Here is what I see in the logs:
Feb 28 10:57:29 s1 spamd[15535]: prefork: child states: B
Feb 28 10:57:29 s1 spamd[15535]: prefork: server
Hi,
Check your spamassassin bayes directory, in your case it's
/home/spamassassin/.spamassassin/, for the bayes.lock.* files? I seen
this you need to temporarily stop spamd then remove the bayes.lock.*
files there. Then start spamd and it should clear this up.
I think the reason for this if you
Hi,
Yes, I have whitelist myself. I see it as that score without the whitelist.
Regards,
Frank
On 26/02/2008 3:21 PM, fchan wrote:
Hi,
Thank you Loren Wilton. I think this is best solution for me.
These are not from Kohl's or any other legitimate company. The subject
changes from
Hi,
Thank you Loren Wilton. I think this is best solution for me.
These are not from Kohl's or any other legitimate company. The
subject changes from month to month and the percentages change but
the format remains the same for the subject line. The body uses
legitimate text taken from various
Hi,
I don't mind taking RAM since I have 3GB. I can raise the amount of
child processes and I wanted to find out how much RAM does each child
takes so I can decide how many max children to raise it without
killing my system. Also I would like to check where to raise the
max-child and I was do
Hi,
I had the same problem before and needed to contact yahoo.com
postmaster and they resolved it within one day. Here is the yahoo.com
postmaster URL:
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/
Click on "Contact Customer Care" and select Delivery Issues.
I hope this helps.
Frank
Sorr
Hi,
I'm get alot of these February 77% OFF or variations (ie January 73%
OFF and my guess March 75% OFF next month) thereof in the subject
line for spam. The body always changes so I can't really key on this.
I would like to make rule that subject line filter this type of spam.
Thank you in a
Hello,
I thought I set this in /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamd for RedHat Linux but
maybe I'm wrong. I see this about --max-children for spamd:
-m number , --max-children=number
This option specifies the maximum number of children to spawn.
Spamd will spawn that number of children, then sleep in th
.apache.org
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0
tests=SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Subject: Re: Getting ? in spam scores.
From: Karsten BrÉckelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 04:14:40 +0100
Mes
ier...
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 16:45 -0800, fchan wrote:
Thank you. I have check my DNS and it appears to resolve the link
correctly.
What link? The spample does not show any. Also, the DNS queries relevant
for SA are those to the various blacklists. By default including URI as
well as IP blacklis
message(s)
examined)". Why I cannot get sa-learn to learn from this message also.
Thank you for your assistance,
Frank
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 14:57 -0800, fchan wrote:
I'm getting spam scores (ie No, hits=? required=?) from certain types
of spam messages. Most of them have phishing
Hi,
I'm getting spam scores (ie No, hits=? required=?) from certain types
of spam messages. Most of them have phishing links but I have no
problem with most messages with links. I'm using qmail with
qmail-scanner-2.01st on RedHat Linux ES5.
Below is excerpt of a message that I get with this:
Hi,
I updated from spamassassin 3.2.3 to 3.2.4 and I'm still getting
these question marks in score from spamassassin.
Here is a sample of the header I get with this message:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 23882 invoked by uid 501); 11 Jan 2008
Title: Fwd: Re: Adjusting the AWL
value
Since we are getting off the subject of Adjusting the AWL value.
Maybe I could use one or more of these to extricate certain parts of
ones body from another part of the body:
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/gbu-28e.htm
Seriously en
43 matches
Mail list logo