some host information (whois).
I know it's a bad idea to feed my blacklist directly, so I will check
and edit the output by hand and after that add it to rbl. This won't be
too much work as most spam is coming to me from only few ips (or ip
ranges) at this time.
Thinline Maillist wrote:
Hi,
I'd
Hi,
I'd like to log IPs from Received headers to spamd's log file for
statistics and further analysis (but only from messages marked as spam).
I tried to modify the code of spamd program, but unsuccessfully, since I
chose to add it to parse_headers() subroutine, where only protocol
specific
Hi guys,
slackware 11.0
spamassassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.64
sendmail 8.14
I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it looks
like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam message, and
run it through spamassassin
Bowie Bailey wrote:
maillist wrote:
Hi guys,
slackware 11.0
spamassassin version 3.2.5
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.64
sendmail 8.14
I am getting a lot of spam. I did some investigating, and it
looks like I have something set up incorrectly. If I get a spam
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
RBL hits. They most likely have been updated since the original scan.
Since you get this result with a subsequent spamc run, too, we pretty
much can rule out permanent DNS failures or local tests option. Still, a
(potentially local) temporary DNS issue might explain
Theodore Heise schrieb am 09.03.2008 19:15:
Occasionally I get unsolicited bulk e-mail on a topic that is of
borderline interest to me. My tendency is to deleted it from my spam
folder before training the Bayes functions on my spam. I've
considered training Bayes on these messages as ham,
Sg wrote:
Hi
After modifying the configurations and scores should we restart
the SA. How to start the SA-3.2.3?
--
Sg
you really should be able to just type in \usr\bin\spamd at the
command prompt, and it will start. man spamd will show you the
switches involved.
I do this
slackware 11.0
spamassassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang 2.63
sendmail 8.14.0
My issue is that it appears that spam is getting through without being
scanned. I get a spam message, then run spamassassin -t message and
it scores high enough to get marked as spam. I
Kenneth Porter wrote:
A teammate called my attention to this interesting project:
http://stupidfilter.org/main/index.php?n=Main.About
The solution we're creating is simple: an open-source filter software
that can detect rampant stupidity in written English. This will be
accomplished with
Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:36 PM maillist wrote:
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
Check for either /etc/mail/sa-mimedefang.cf or
/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-mimedefang.cf
Jason
SpamAssassin version 3.2.3
running on Perl version 5.8.8
mimedefang version 2.63
sendmail Version 8.14.0
I have been running spamassassin for over 2 years now, and suddenly, the
required score has changed. I have it set to 7.0, but it has suddenly
changed back to the default of 5.0. I only
Skip wrote:
Guess this would help:
Using sendmail 8.13.8 with SA 3.2.3
- Skip
From: Chris 'Xenon' Hanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usually you do this with a combination of trusted_networks
and exclusion in your scanner.
You may want to look into mimedefang. It works well
mel goldberg wrote:
I’m new to the list, apologize in advance if I should be posting this
somewhere else.
I am attempting to SPAM filter and forward from my server to another.
Spamassassin filters but the server will not forward. Has anyone found
a way to do this?
You can use mimedefang.
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
2007/9/12, Jon Trulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Jason Bertoch wrote:
On Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:07 PM Marc Perkel wrote:
The details are a little to complex for this forum ...
OK - had quite a few trolls here who
Miguel wrote:
Dear All, im using SA in a central system wide dedicated filter, so i
dont have any account in it, the clean emails are forwarded to the
final destination servers.
In this scenario, nobody will be training SA, so, does it make sense
to use the bayesian filter at all? ,or SA will
As you want a site-wide Bayes, you also need the bayes_path
parameter. What setting do you have for bayes_path (note it
isn't a simple directory name).
bayes_path /usr/spamassassin/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0777
OK, is the directory /usr/spamassassin writable by the user-ID that
you are
RinkWorks wrote:
I'm trying to run Spam Assassin 3.1.7 as root
Let me stop you right there. You cannot run spamd as root. It drops
privs, and runs as user nobody.
/usr/sbin/spamd --create-prefs --max-children 5 --helper-home-dir -d
--pidfile=/var/run/spamd.pid
It would be best to create a
Igor Chudov wrote:
Read this jaw dropping article about how someone patented what has
been done by procmail for many, many years.
http://informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201802746
First of all, how can you sue someone or an organization for something
like this? How
Ray Dzek wrote:
Just as a side note...
I am a charter customer. I have spoken with their techincal assistance
many times, and at various levels, for myself and on behalf of others I
have tried to assist. They are by far the most incompetent ISP I have
ever dealt with. They only have one
on the mimedefang maillist, and found this
It's bug 5444. Mimedefang needs to call Mail::SA::Message-finish().
I'll see what I can figure out, and get back with you.
-=Aubrey=-
Lanfranco Fabriani wrote:
Dear sirs,
I'm sorry for my bad english, and I don't know if this is the
right mailinglist.
For a long time that I ran spamassassin 3.1.[4-8] on a
mail server Linux Box with sendmail 8.13 and mimedefang (I think it is
the release 2.5.1). Spamassassin and
Michael Chapman wrote:
Well, nothing has worked so far ... every message that I have coming
in (except for the specifically white-listed messages from this
mailing list) have USER_IN_BLACKLIST flagged. Where on earth is it
getting this? You've seen my local.cf, I don't have a user_prefs
Michael Chapman wrote:
Hi there:
This should be a fairly simple question for the experts out there ...
everything I'm receiving is being blacklisted, and the reports
indicate that all these messages are flagged as USER_IN_BLACKLIST.
Where? I don't have a user_prefs, and my global is really
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
wrote on 16 Aug 2007 17:26:42 -:
One thing I noticed when experimenting with pre-filters: bayes no longer knows
about
certain kinds of spam. If, for some reason, the prefilter does not catch (i.e.
you are
one of the first to get a new spam run) then SA might pass
Henry Weber wrote:
Hello,
We are an email hosting provider and are interested in finding
sometime who could help tighten the spamassassin setup on our servers.
We are willing to pay for services as long as there is a good result.
If you are interested, please email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris wrote:
On Tuesday 29 May 2007 9:52 am, ram wrote:
This is a very intelligently written scam mail
http://ecm.netcore.co.in/tmp/missed.txt
I set my servers to pretty aggressive custom rules , but I am not able
to catch this spam
Bayes has messed up agreed but even not counting bayes
Ming Hou wrote:
Thank all of your replies.
I did try the following option:
perl Makefile.PL INC='-I/usr/local/ssl/include'
LIBS='-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -lssl -lcrypto'
The make test still failed for the SSL portion. Any ideal?
Thanks.
ming
After fighting with many problems with this
Pradeep Mishra wrote:
Hello Friends
I am a newbie on spamassassin and would like to know..
1) How can we train the spamassassin using bayesian to FILTER ALL
OUTGOING AS WELL AS INCOMING messages from my server.
2) Some really Best Practices for implementing and running Spamassassin.
Thanks
BG Mahesh wrote:
hi
I want to pass the comments/text entered by users on a form to
SpamAssassin for approval. If it approves it only then I want to
accept the text, else I want to inform the user that the text is Spam
and reject the user's comments.
We use PHP and want to know how to
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
I have a customer that needs to setup their reverse DNS. The mail server
identifies itself as, for example, abc.com. The Address record for
abc.com points to our web hosting server here naturally since we host
the web site. They have an Address record of mail.abc.com
jpff wrote:
Since I upgraded to SpamAssassin version 3.1.8 running on Perl version
5.8.4 I have had problems. The mailer get swamped and I get lots of
odd mesages; simple example.
Apr 13 21:07:26 snout spamd[17853]: Attempt to free non-existent shared string 'test_names_hit' at
porterj wrote:
I just set-up spamassassin on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 mail server and it
appears that spamassassin is working as I am seeing messages that are now
tagged as spam.
However, in my /var/log/maillog I keep seeing a message similar to the
following and am unsure how to fix it.
porterj wrote:
Thanks for your replies. I did not realize this message was being spawned by
'spamc'. I had established a -u username but had it kicking off with the
'spamd' process. I corrected this and the errors went away.
Speaking of auto whitelist. Is this not a good feature to use?
Joey Davis wrote:
Sorry, I intended to included this entry from the messages log:
Apr 10 00:00:02 msop sendmail[1622]: unable to dlopen
/usr/lib/sasl2/libcrammd5.so.2: /usr/lib/sasl2/libcrammd5.so.2: failed to
map segment from shared object: Cannot allocate memory
Thanks,
Joey
Walter Keen wrote:
I've been told there is some sort of a subscription service for SA rules
to check messages against
Does such a thing exist, I havent had any luck on google...
Yes, I have a service. It is $5000.00 per year, payable up front. I
will run sa-update for you, from
I have seen a few people present, on this mail list, nicely detailed
graphs, that obviously were the result of some server output, but they
focused on email, mainly spam. I am interested in having the same.
Does anyone have any recommendations for a good package that can do this?
All I
a charm
almost out-of-the-box. Though it should be available as a package for
another distros...
Luix
2007/4/4, maillist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have seen a few people present, on this mail list, nicely detailed
graphs, that obviously were the result of some server output
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
Are you using (SMTP) Sender Address Verifications?
You might see that as filtering, but to the systems (including
both spam traps and SMTP servers) you connect to in order to
verify falsified senders your system looks and
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 03:48:33PM +1000, James Lees Vodanovich wrote:
Spamass-milter crashes about once a week.
Here is the backtrace from spamass-milter.core (72MB)
Any idea's
Talk to the spamass-milter people.
...or use mimedefang. I've heard a lot of
David Gibbs wrote:
--[ UxBoD ]-- wrote:
Yes image spam can be a real pain.
While I agree that image spam is a PITA ... I have to wonder how ANYONE
in the right mind could fall for that garbage.
I mean, be real ... if the message you get contains an image, surrounded
by garbage text,
The only tests that they score for me are BAYES_99, which should be
enough to get them sent to my spam-drop, but they get to the users
instead. When I --lint -D I don't see anything that tells me that I
have a config problem.
I start spamd this way, as root...
/usr/bin/spamd -r
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
As per the title, I'm seeing a pretty big rise this last week. So far
this week has seen the most spam I've ever had to deal with in over 10
years.
RBLs and SA are catching more, as is greylisting. That said, yesterday
saw double my 'usual' amount of spam. Though
Lance Albertson wrote:
I recently updated SA on our machines from 3.1.1 to 3.1.8 and I started
noticing a new issue crop up. I also noticed that someone else had a
similar problem and reported it on this last back in January [1], but it
never got an answer back about it. I've looked elsewhere
I've been on this mail list only for a few months now, and am wondering
if I am the smallest guy here. I often have questions, and usually find
the answer just by browsing in past mails, which is really cool. I see
most of the folks that are questioning/replying are admins of rather
large
Marc Perkel wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
The don't seem to have any contact info. Anyone know anything about
them?
Whoops - typo. - I mean apews.org
Dunno. Tar-pit?
Joey Davis wrote:
Greetings ...
I can not get spamassassin to work. I have seen this problem in some
newgroups but no definitive solution. Here is the information
OS Version: FC5
Sendmail: 8.13.7
Spamassassin: 3.1.3
Log entries:
Mar 19 17:28:32 obwat sendmail[29903]: l2JMSW21029903:
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
What version of SA are you running? If not 3.1.8 then upgrade.
# spamassassin -V
SpamAssassin version 3.1.8
running on Perl version 5.8.8
rocsca
I was having the same problem with v 3.1.7, and when I upgraded to
3.1.8, they stopped.
Do you get the same
Mark Adams wrote:
Hi All,
I have not got to the bottom of this. Does anyone know how to report on
whether a mail is having points deducted because it is whitelisted?
Regards,
Mark
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 03:34:58PM +, Mark Adams wrote:
Thanks for that,
The lint has not complained
sushma wrote:
hi,
Iam running spamassassin in another machine and relaying mails to
local machine(i.e i am not running spamassassin in local machine). In
this case how to reject mails destined to unknow user.
Mail that comes to your server that is destined for a user that you
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Hello,
I receiveid a spam message this morning in my mailbox. So I submit it to
spamassassin to calculate the score that spamassassin give it.
Here the result:
Content preview: Diable! bird market light sort said Monte Cristo
compassionately,
it i Villefort pressed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I am relativley new to SA with this my first major install hopefully of many
The current server is RHEL4 running
spamass-milter-0.3.1-3.el4.kb
spamassassin-3.1.8-2.el4
sendmail-8.13.1-3.RHEL4.5
From the log there seems to be multiple errors and I am not sure
YN Verma wrote:
Hi
We have configured SpamAssisn3.1.5 and integrated with Sun Jave Messaging
Server. The system seems to be working perfectly. In the Spam Log I can find
that messages are getting filtered.
But in the log I can not find the username or the sender mail address.
I would
Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
Hi !
Is there a way to save/archive mails that are scanned by spamd to an
eml-file on the spamd-server ???
Ove Starckjohann
Yes there are many ways to do that, but what is your setup?
-=Aubrey=-
Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
HI!
Mailflow is as follows:
Internet - Mail is received by a Proxy-Server (closed source) - mail is
forwarded to spamd - score is reported back to proxy
So - because i cannot pipe the mail through other servers / programs the spamd
is my only chance to archive the
Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
Hi!
What line may i add in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
to archive all mails that are checked by spamd ???
Ove
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: maillist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 13:25
Cc: users
Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
It was Aubreys Mail:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: maillist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
It should be /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
-=Aubrey=-
Ove Starckjohann
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet
Marc Perkel wrote:
What would cause then when trying to run sa-learn. Running FC6 - what
am I missing?
Can't locate IO/Socket/INET.pm
Download IO::Socket from CPAN
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/G/GB/GBARR/IO-1.2301.tar.gz
-=Aubrey=-
Michał Jęczalik wrote:
Hello,
after upgrading from 3.1.7 I have numerous problems with my spamd. It
hangs up during high load and become permamently unresponsive.
According to advices I have found on devel list, I'm using
--round-robin now and it hangs less often. But now I have a lot of
Michał Jęczalik wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, maillist wrote:
Michał Jęczalik wrote:
Hello,
after upgrading from 3.1.7 I have numerous problems with my spamd.
It hangs up during high load and become permamently unresponsive.
According to advices I have found on devel list, I'm using
Mark Adams wrote:
Hi All,
Quick questions regarding whitelisting. I have read that whitelisting
applies -50 points whether using whitelist_from or whitelist_from_rcvd.
My question is can this amount be altered?
Thanks for any help.
Regards,
Mark
Yes edit your
Dave Williss wrote:
I've started recieving a few spams a day that aren't even getting
scanned by Spamassassin. Or at least they don't get any X-Spam
headers added on.
The messages in question all have forged senders to make them look
like they came from an existing user within my own domain
Michael Connors wrote:
On 14/02/07, *maillist* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Connors wrote:
Hi,
I have been getting a lot of spam messages as indicated in the
content
preview below.
Content preview: ENERGY COMPANY ALERT
Content analysis details: (8.6 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
2.4 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (softfail)
[SPF failed: Please see
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
On Wednesday 14 February 2007 14:55, maillist wrote:
Content analysis details: (8.6 points, 7.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
2.4 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO
Michael Connors wrote:
Hi,
I have been getting a lot of spam messages as indicated in the content
preview below.
Content preview: ENERGY COMPANY ALERT!! Search for: UTEVCurrent price:
$0.016 Market: bullish!!! TRADE SMART AND WIN WITH US NOW!! [...]
Content analysis details: (7.1
Bahram Fahnestock wrote:
Hi,
Save over 50% on your medication
http://www.ledrx .com
Remove space in the above link
Christmas, but... well, I expect youre all going to want to stay at
Hogwarts, what with... one thing and another.
Mum! said Ron irritably. What dyou three know that we dont?
OS - slackware 11.0
# spamd -V
SpamAssassin Server version 3.1.7
running on Perl 5.8.8
with SSL support (IO::Socket::SSL 1.02)
sendmail Version 8.13.8 - MBOX format
mimedefang version 2.58
A few spam messages that are all pretty similar are getting through my
server. I don't know why,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
There has been quite a bit of discussion of these spams recently.
See the current TVD_SILLY_URI_OBFU thread.
I will do..
Thanks,
rocsca
I feel that, that thread is being watched by many. Even spammers.
I'm new, but I think it's interesting how there were
Philip Seccombe wrote:
Does anyone have any ideas how I can get the emails back on the
server, or keep a copy on the server to create a bayes database on?
I thought of forwarding emails back, but then its a forwarded email
and not the actual one which will mess up the database.
I've no
Matt Kettler wrote:
Monty Ree wrote:
Hello, list.
I would like to ask some about bayes.
If I have recevied ham mail which written ***SPAM***, So in order to
train bayes this mail with sa-learn to ham, I forwarded this mail
using outlook or outlook express to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and this
Not every time I respond, but sometimes, when I reply to this maillist,
I get a bounce-back that starts off like this:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apache.org.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Dhaval Patel wrote:
I am running a Debian stable system and have perl 5.8.4 installed
from the Debian packages.
I had a problem with the Net::DNS module a while back and upgrade
perl to 5.8.8 using
CPAN. This upgrade installed perl 5.8.8 as the default perl version
Matthew Bickerton wrote:
I am having a problem with the Net::DNS module. It just hangs up when trying
to resolve a domain to get the TXT data for SPF tests in spanassassin. If I
try to reinstall the module it fail the make test. How did you solve the
problem?
Matthew
-Original Message-
Kim Christensen wrote:
Hey list,
I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my
personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts.
% sa-learn --dump magic
...
0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0475
maillist wrote:
Kim Christensen wrote:
Hey list,
I've recently started training our bayesian filter with spam/ham from my
personal mailbox, to prepare for live usage on our customer accounts.
% sa-learn --dump magic
...
0.000 0340 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000
R Lists06 wrote:
Is it ok to sa-learn train forwarded messages that end up in my local
account mailboxes from accounts on remote servers (out of my admin control)
that are spam?
- rh
--
Robert - Abba Communications
Computer Internet Services
(509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net
I
Kurt Buff wrote:
Missed the beginning of this conversation.
If it's about 'naughty' words, then I've got a word for you:
Scunthorpe
It's a small town in the UK, and their local government had almost no
incoming mail when they implemented a naive naughty word filter, until
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running spamassassin 3.0 and I'm invoking it through amavisd. When I train
the spamassassin using sa-learn for ham and spam respectively, it seems to
only work for the ham not the spam. The command runs fine, but spam e-mail
that I trained spamassassin with still show up
Bret Miller wrote:
I am looking for an easy way for my spamassassin to relearn messages
marked as spam that users would like to get. Would it be
safe and avoid
bayesian poisoning if I were to setup an email box such as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and have users forward nonspam emails to this email
Thomas Schlosser wrote:
Hi,
I have a SUSE 9.3 mailserver with Postfix and SA 3.1.7 running.
Unfortunately the commands (run as root)
spamassassin mail
and
spamc mail
calculate different results. In fact they seem to run different tests.
I postet the details in a german forum:
Guido van Brakel wrote:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Im trying to install SpamAssasin under Windows,I installed perl and nmake.
But I'm getting these errors:
---
C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe version.h.pl
version.h.pl: creating version.h
copy config.h.win config.h
copy spamc.h.win spamc.h
C:\Perl\bin\perl.exe
Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 26 December 2006 05:53:12 + Monty Ree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello, list.
I have used well SA with procmail well against incoming mail.
But there are lots of outgoing spam-mails using web programs or using
sendmail at my server.
(There are several domains are
JamesDR wrote:
David Flanigan wrote:
James,
Thanks for the reply. I was not planing on double scanning, the BCC
idea is basically the same, though I would be doing it vial the
/etc/aliases mapping to make it transparent. I am running Sendmail as
the MTA.
The real question is how do to the
Vernon Webb wrote:
I have a ton of these emails getting through that have the sender's name and the word
Present getting through and they are the same as the insider information from last
week. I have MailScanner, SpamAssassin, SARE, Botnet, Razor2, Pyzor, ClamAv and f-prot
all installed and
Exal de Jesus Garcia Carrillo wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I have already install spamassassin locally on my machine, now, I
want tell to spamassassin which message is spam and which isn't, I have
read about spamc and sa-learn, but how is you use exactly?, I mean I
85 matches
Mail list logo
