On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Same thing here, except that it also eats as much memory as it can...
Scan times keep growing bigger and bigger in time...
I saw this problem too on our scanning machine (dual Xeon HT 1GB
RAM), upgraded to SA 3.0 over the weekend. After awhile (4-8
I posted some graphs of my Mem and Swap utilization under 3.0 and 2.64 but
I didn't realize provide a legend. The green is memory/swap used and the
blue is free. You can see that under 3.0 (the first half of the graph)
about 1/2 of my swap was used and under 2.64, just a tiny fraction is used.
Same thing here, except that it also eats as much memory as it can...
Scan times keep growing bigger and bigger in time...
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:56:01 -0600, Shane Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I take it that no one is seeing these weird spamd delays but me? Rats.
Shane Hickey [EMAIL
I agree about the memory. But my problem also seemed to be that it was eating
a fair amount of swap. This is on a machine with 500M of ram. I finally gave
up and went back to 2.64.
Here's a link to some pngs that illustrate the symptoms.
http://www.howsyournetwork.com/mem-day.png
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:56:01 -0600, Shane Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I take it that no one is seeing these weird spamd delays but me?
Rats.
Hum. Are you also perchance out of swap space as well as memory?
Loren
Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-10-01 15:13]:
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:56:01 -0600, Shane Hickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I take it that no one is seeing these weird spamd delays but
me?
Rats.
Hum. Are you also perchance out of swap space as well as memory?
I posted some
So, I take it that no one is seeing these weird spamd delays but me? Rats.
Shane Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-09-29 14:11]:
Howdy all. I'm running version 3.0.0 on Gentoo Linux (using the
3.0.0-r1 ebuild). The machine is a dual P3/450 and it is also running
sendmail 8.12.11 and it handles
