> I didn't want to cloud the situation, as we were progressing
> in very small steps in improving the scoring of the OPs SA.
> As he was already using RDJ for the SARE rules I thought the
> easiest first step would be to get sa-update set up for the
> default ruleset and then once the OP was h
Hi,
Jon Armitage wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Anthony Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 February 2007 15:56
To: SpamAssassin Users
sa-update updates the stock rules that are distributed with
SA. Rules Du Jour is used to update add-on rulesets like the
SARE rules.
If yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> I believe there a way to use sa-update to get the SARE rules from
> saupdates.openprotect.com.
There's a good guide here: http://daryl.dostech.ca/sa-update/sare/sare-
sa-update-howto.txt
HTH
-- A.
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Peacock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 February 2007 15:56
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> sa-update updates the stock rules that are distributed with
> SA. Rules Du Jour is used to update add-on rulesets like the
> SARE rules.
>
> If you are not r
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
The other thing to do is to run sa-update to make sure you
are running the latest versions of the standard SA rules.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-update.html
I already use rules_du_jour.. It's OK? Or I can obtain further
improvement using sa-update?
> The other thing to do is to run sa-update to make sure you
> are running the latest versions of the standard SA rules.
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.1.x/doc/sa-update.html
I already use rules_du_jour.. It's OK? Or I can obtain further
improvement using sa-update?
rocsca
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Your network tests are still not working. Run spamassassin
-D again to make sure the Net::DNS installation is being used by SA.
Infact, I'm tryng to install it cos it is not installed..
I have succeded..
Attached there is the output of spamassassin -D before and after
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Your network tests are still not working. Run spamassassin
-D again to make sure the Net::DNS installation is being used by SA.
Infact, I'm tryng to install it cos it is not installed..
I have succeded..
Attached there is the output of spamassassin -D before and
Hi,
Keep replies on the list.
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
[30482] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver available? no
[30482] dbg: dns: is DNS available? 0
Ive installed Net::DNS::Resolver. DNS server is local.
And have you run spamassassin -D to make sure it is picking it up correctly?
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
I think the next thing you need to do is run the command with
the -D switch.
The output is attached..
There are a few problems that jump out at me here, I am sure others will
pick up on any I have missed:
1.
[30482] dbg: dns: is Net::DNS::Resolver availabl
> I think the next thing you need to do is run the command with
> the -D switch.
The output is attached..
> It doesn't look like you are running any network tests, you
> are certainly not running any Bayes tests.
I have executed the command you've sayed me after lauching spamd..
> Can you rem
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
If you have the email saved in a text file called email.txt,
run this command making sure that you are logged in as the
user who spamd run as.
spamassassin -t < email.txt
If you want a lot more information you can use the debug switch
spamassassin -D -t < email.t
> If you have the email saved in a text file called email.txt,
> run this command making sure that you are logged in as the
> user who spamd run as.
>
> spamassassin -t < email.txt
>
> If you want a lot more information you can use the debug switch
>
> spamassassin -D -t < email.txt
Thanks.
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Can you so us which tests these emails hit on your system?
Please tell me how I have to do..
If you have the email saved in a text file called email.txt, run this
command making sure that you are logged in as the user who spamd run as.
spamassassin -t < email.txt
I
> Can you so us which tests these emails hit on your system?
Please tell me how I have to do..
rocsca
> Enable network tests. You may have to set up several things
> correctly to get this to work, but just removing "-L" from
> the spamd startup line may be enough as a start.
I don' understand.. If I have a message in mbox format, what I have to
do so that I can see what score SA should assign
> > Put a full email (including all headers) on a web page somewhere.
>
> http://www.rocsca.it/it_by_confocal.out
>
> That's not a drug spam, that's a stock spam. It just happens
> to be for a pharmacutical company.
Sorry! I'm not very experienced with the kinds of spam..
I'ld very to learn t
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
>> Antidrug has been mereged into 20_drugs.cf from the standard
>> ruleset. If you read through the file, you'll find the
>> antidrug rules. It's about halfway down.
>>
>
> OK. Now Its all clear!! I have an old 'antidrug.cf' file in SA config
> dir.. maybe this overco
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
My scores:
Content analysis details: (10.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
0.0 DK_POLICY_S
How I have to do to get the score for the same message on my platform?
Enable network tests. You may have to set up several things correctly to
get this to work, but just removing "-L" from the spamd startup line may be
enough as a start.
Looking at this my Bayes scores it highly, but s
Put a full email (including all headers) on a web page somewhere.
http://www.rocsca.it/it_by_confocal.out
That's not a drug spam, that's a stock spam. It just happens to be for a
pharmacutical company.
Get the SARE stocks ruleset and you will have some better luck. Often these
are GIF ima
> My scores:
>
> Content analysis details: (10.4 points, 5.0 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> --
> --
> 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
> 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME D
> Put a full email (including all headers) on a web page somewhere.
http://www.rocsca.it/it_by_confocal.out
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Put a full email (including all headers) on a web page somewhere.
http://www.rocsca.it/it_by_confocal.out
My scores:
Content analysis details: (10.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
Hi,
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
Antidrug has been mereged into 20_drugs.cf from the standard
ruleset. If you read through the file, you'll find the
antidrug rules. It's about halfway down.
OK. Now Its all clear!! I have an old 'antidrug.cf' file in SA config
dir.. maybe this overcome 20_drugs.cf?
> Antidrug has been mereged into 20_drugs.cf from the standard
> ruleset. If you read through the file, you'll find the
> antidrug rules. It's about halfway down.
OK. Now Its all clear!! I have an old 'antidrug.cf' file in SA config
dir.. maybe this overcome 20_drugs.cf? I don't know.. but I hav
Rocco Scappatura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> SA doesn't blocks emails cointaining spam email with pharmaceutical
> contents..
>
> I think of missing some ruleset. I cant figure out what..
>
> I think that the more appropriate is antidrug.cf but on SA site I have
> read that it is unnecessary..
>
> But if I
Rocco Scappatura ha scritto:
> Hello,
>
> SA doesn't blocks emails cointaining spam email with pharmaceutical
> contents..
>
> I think of missing some ruleset. I cant figure out what..
>
> I think that the more appropriate is antidrug.cf but on SA site I have
> read that it is unnecessary..
>
>
Hello,
SA doesn't blocks emails cointaining spam email with pharmaceutical
contents..
I think of missing some ruleset. I cant figure out what..
I think that the more appropriate is antidrug.cf but on SA site I have
read that it is unnecessary..
But if I look into the dir of conf file of spamass
29 matches
Mail list logo
