Re: [2] Bayes training question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yossim wrote: > Steve, I am not sure that i have anderstand the first script starting > with get_ham_spam were you use fetchmail (where the data is kept?) and > the last one get-ham-spam when you used wget command to get all the > ham.spam emails. Kind

Re: [2] Bayes training question

> iD8DBQFF1ay5eERILVgMyvARAk2JAJ4rXyGAcdzv14vcTreJmSpnNLP1LwCffXiS >> zoIrJH2UIIUawBbshrVJ8Sc= >> =4mR1 >> -END PGP SIGNATURE- >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-training-question-tf3237974.html#a9011746 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [2] Bayes training question

1 > -END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bayes-training-question-tf3237974.html#a9004292 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Bayes training question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yossim wrote: > Hi folks, Hi can i learn miss identified junk mail that is store on > exchange or at the otulook clients? Can i simply copy those mails to a > folder on my Linux server and run sa-learn with the required parameters? > Kindly regards, Yo

Bayes training question

/Bayes-training-question-tf3237974.html#a8999732 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: bayes training question

He's on a machine I administer. I have a "thing" about autolearn. I don't do it. So this is not a problem for Loren. (It's too big a pain to repair a self-mis-trained bayes database. So the neat selectively trained bayes databases we have work quite nicely as a result.) I cannot see the long term u

Re: bayes training question

Jim Maul wrote: It fixes my problem of list messages being autolearned incorrectly, but i'd rather not scan them at all. Someone made a suggestion (and patch) on the qmail scanner mailing list where you can optionally turn SA scanning off using tcp.smtp from certain ip's. I may use this t

Re: bayes training question

Very nice solution for my needs. Thank you ! maurizio Il giorno mar, 24-05-2005 alle 13:08 -0400, Jim Maul ha scritto: > mizzio wrote: > > Hello guys, > > sorry to bother you again: I didn't find a way to exclude this mailing > > list from SA scanning in my setup. > > I'm using qmail + qmail-scan

Re: bayes training question

Until i can come up with a way to not scan some emails selectively using qmail-scanner (without procmail) i have setteled on using the following statements in my local.cf bayes_ignore_to users@spamassassin.apache.org whitelist_to users@spamassassin.apache.org This causes (most) list messages

Re: bayes training question

mizzio wrote: Hello guys, sorry to bother you again: I didn't find a way to exclude this mailing list from SA scanning in my setup. I'm using qmail + qmail-scanner + spamassassin on my mailserver, the only posts I found are about excluding the scanning with procmail (which I'm not using). I did

Re: bayes training question

Loren, it works: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-56.2 required=4.5 X-Spam-Report: SA TESTS -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST_SA SA List 2.4 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4439] One more question: I understand that in this way the mail are never marked at spam, but they are auto

Re: bayes training question

> I did not find a way of doing this through qmail-scanner: is there a way > of doing this directly with spamassassin ? Possibly someone else knows of a way with qmail-scanner. If not, you can't "exclude" it with SA, but you *can* whitelist the list with SA. That will probably be sufficient. Th

Re: bayes training question

Hello guys, sorry to bother you again: I didn't find a way to exclude this mailing list from SA scanning in my setup. I'm using qmail + qmail-scanner + spamassassin on my mailserver, the only posts I found are about excluding the scanning with procmail (which I'm not using). I did not find a way o

Re: bayes training question

Thank very much Loren. regards, mizzio Il giorno lun, 23-05-2005 alle 04:51 -0700, Loren Wilton ha scritto: > > - I get some messages marked as SPAM coming form this mailing list, > > since the body contains URLs and text from real spam messages: do I have > > to feed them in my DB as ham or this

Re: bayes training question

> - I get some messages marked as SPAM coming form this mailing list, > since the body contains URLs and text from real spam messages: do I have > to feed them in my DB as ham or this can cause some kind of bayes > poisoning ? The best thing is to avoid having the mail from this list go through SA

bayes training question

Hi everybody, first post on this list so please be patient if I'm asking dumb questions. :-) I have a spamassassin 3.0.3 mail gateway which is working pretty well and I train the bayesian DB everyday. I have a couple of questions on this: - I get some messages marked as SPAM coming form this mai