On Thu, February 19, 2009 15:50, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Am I missing something stupid? (Wouldn't be the 1st time)
read 25_uribl.cf (google.com is in there)
spamassassin 21 -D -t spammsg | less
see skib domains
header __NFheader ALL =~ /live\.com/i
score __NFheader 0.1
uri __NFuri
Hi All,
I've written the following rule to deal with spam a particular set of
users are getting hit by that very few of my rules are hitting.
Using --lint the rule come back clean but on testing it appears to be
ignored. It's in the spamassassin directory.
Am I missing something stupid?
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:50 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Using --lint the rule come back clean but on testing it appears to be
ignored. It's in the spamassassin directory.
Am I missing something stupid? (Wouldn't be the 1st time)
You're missing a lot of details. How do you test your rules?
Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
I've written the following rule to deal with spam a particular set of
users are getting hit by that very few of my rules are hitting.
Using --lint the rule come back clean but on testing it appears to be
ignored. It's in the spamassassin directory.
Am I
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:16:48 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann
guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:50 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Using --lint the rule come back clean but on testing it appears to be
ignored. It's in the spamassassin directory.
Am I missing something stupid?
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 15:21 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:16:48 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
Am I missing something stupid? (Wouldn't be the 1st time)
You're missing a lot of details. How do you test your rules? Try using
the -D debugging, to see if the
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Testing was done through spamassassin --lint and with debug. I used a
mail that *should* have hit the rules.
--lint is not for testing rule performance, as it uses an
internally-generated test message. It's just to check for syntax errors.
As has
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:50 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Hi All,
I've written the following rule to deal with spam a particular set of
users are getting hit by that very few of my rules are hitting.
Using --lint the rule come back clean but on testing it appears to be
ignored. It's in the
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:01:48 -0800 (PST), John Hardin
jhar...@impsec.org wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Testing was done through spamassassin --lint and with debug. I used a
mail that *should* have hit the rules.
--lint is not for testing rule performance, as it uses an
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 16:37 +, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
Many thanks to all... I have the rule working. As usual it was a
syntactical error (typo).
;) Good to see it fixed.
uri __NFuri m{^https?\://www\.google\.com/groups?}i
Aha, so it's not m,groups/, with a trailing slash, as in your
Feel free to mangle it, I'd appreciate a copy of any wider ranging
working versions though.
Here's what I've been using for quite a while. It was written when there
was a spate of spam punting LiveSpace websites:
header __MG_LSP1 From =~ /spaces\.live\.com/i
uri __MG_LSP2
11 matches
Mail list logo
