On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 15:21 +0000, Nigel Frankcom wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:16:48 +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > Am I missing something stupid? (Wouldn't be the 1st time)
> >
> > You're missing a lot of details. How do you test your rules? Try using
> > the -D debugging, to see if the sub-rules actually hit. No sample, so we
> > can't tell if your rules are correct.
> Testing was done through spamassassin --lint and with debug. I used a
> mail that *should* have hit the rules. Tried it with and without
> scores for meta's... just in case.
Still missing the details. :) Like pasting the exact command you used
for testing. Anyway, seeing that "and" above -- you didn't happen to try
testing while still keeping the --lint?
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
