I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
Does anybody recognize the text of the message? I'd like to confirm that
there are no popular DUL lists showing 74.254.46.133 as
Dan Barker schrieb:
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
Does anybody recognize the text of the message? I'd like to confirm that
there are no popular DUL lists showing
Dan Barker schrieb:
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
Does anybody recognize the text of the message? I'd like to confirm
that there are no popular DUL
Dan Barker schrieb:
Dan Barker follows up:
I think you confirmed that my delegated rDNS is proper and that the 421
message is in error. But I'm not certain. Can you please confirm your
assessment? My ISP provides me a /26 subnet out of the 74.254.46.0 class C,
so the rDNS delegation is done with
At 07:42 12-06-2007, Dan Barker wrote:
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
That IP address is not dynamic. The reverse DNS is correct.
Does anybody recognize the
Dan Barker wrote:
I'm receiving a lot of 421 rejects with:
Unexpected connection response from server:
421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address
74.254.46.133
In case there's any doubt about whether or not the Botnet plugin tripped
up on the PTR record situation (and
sounds like a pain. It would _really_ be a pain if it didn't workg!
Dan Barker
-Original Message-
From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 1:25 PM
To: Dan Barker
Cc: 'Spamassassin'
Subject: Re: DUL Lists? - OT
Dan Barker wrote:
I'm receiving a lot of 421
Dan Barker schrieb:
Definitions:
right: follow the CNAME to get a PTR
wrong: return the CNAME as an answer.
Yes thats what I meant, the script on the other side seems to be to
stupid to realise that the first lookup isnt the final answer, in this
wrong answer it finds the own ip and