At 09:37 -0600 03/22/2005, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
>I don't even allow mail from this list to go through SA. In my
>~/.procmailrc, I have a recipe prior to the call to spamc like this:
I do something similar but different. All of my white lists are outside of my
procmailrc so I can edit them more
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 03:47, List Mail User typed:
> Several people have suggested it. Clearly it is just my latent
> paranoia that make me think this way. (Notice, everybody adds "yet";
> Though it would take a stupid spammer to purposely target this list, such
> creatures do exist. Also,
>...
>> >
>> >This header is relatively stable:
>> >
>> >List-Id:
>> >
>> >Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
>> >Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
>> >perl -e"map{y/a-z/l-za-k/;print}shift" "Jjhi pcdiwtg Ptga wprztg,"
>> >
>> And t
From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >...
> >Subject: RE: How do I whitelist this list?
> >Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:25:54 -0800
> >...
> >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >...
> >
&
List Mail User wrote:
...
Subject: RE: How do I whitelist this list?
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:25:54 -0800
...
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
...
Loren Wilton wrote:
Normally this would work very well, but this list changes its name and
description and other charac
>...
>Subject: RE: How do I whitelist this list?
>Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:25:54 -0800
>...
>From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>...
>
>Loren Wilton wrote:
>> Normally this would work very well, but this list changes its name and
>
Matt Kettler wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
bayes_ignore_to users@spamassassin.apache.org
(along with a whitelist_to for the same address).
Doh! I guess it goes to show that AFAIK is more or less nothing :)
More like, just about everything. With the number of problems you solve
for people on
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> bayes_ignore_to users@spamassassin.apache.org
>
> (along with a whitelist_to for the same address).
Doh! I guess it goes to show that AFAIK is more or less nothing :)
Matt Kettler wrote:
This is exactly what i am trying to prevent. I really couldnt care
less if the list messages get marked as spam. What i DONT want to
happen is list messages to get autolearned as ham. Am i correct in
saying that adding the whitelist_from_rcvd will not prevent this from
happen
>...
>"whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache.org" worked when I used static
>whitelists.
>
>I had a bunch of similar entries for various mailing lists in a big
>whitelists.cf file in /etc/mail/spamassassin
>
>
>--
>Eric A. Hallhttp://www.ehsco.com/
>
Loren Wilton wrote:
> Normally this would work very well, but this list changes its name and
> description and other characteristics so often (and without any
> announcement whatever!) that it was impossible to keep up with
> list-of-the-day syndrome.
This header is relatively stable:
List-Id:
From: "Robert Markin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hey everybody,
>
> RH9
> SA 3.0.0 (invoked by procmail spamc/spamd)
> Sendmail 8
> Procmail
>
> I tried to search for this on GMANE but was unsuccessful.
>
> I would like to know how some of you guys are whitelisiting this actual
> mailing list. I h
> I'll mention this again since i have yet to come up with a solution.
> While the above works great for people using procmail, does anyone have
> a solution that works without procmail? Im stuck passing all list
> traffic through SA because of this. Just this morning someone on this
I had a man
>...
>>
>> I'll mention this again since i have yet to come up with a solution.
>> While the above works great for people using procmail, does anyone have
>> a solution that works without procmail? Im stuck passing all list
>> traffic through SA because of this. Just this morning someone on t
Matt Kettler wrote:
Check out the technique used to bypass scanning mail from 127.0.0.1 on
this page:
http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/
So all you need to do is add a tweak to your tcpserver/smtp.rules to
directly deliver messages from the list server's IP directly to
qmail-queue.pl, instead o
Jim Maul wrote:
>
> Ok, so if the autolearner ignores the -100 from the
> whitelist_from_rcvd and uses the score without the -100 to determine
> whether or not it should be autolearned, what is the point of adding
> the whitelist_from_rcvd entry at all? I understand that it will
> pretty much pre
Matt Kettler wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
This will not work as all it does is assign -100 points to the
message. This could cause an autolearn=ham on every message, even the
spam that people post to the list!
Sorry Jim, but that's 100% pure fallacy.. The autolearner explicitly
ignores whitelist and b
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:20:32AM -0800, Robert Markin wrote:
Hey everybody,
RH9
SA 3.0.0 (invoked by procmail spamc/spamd)
Sendmail 8
Procmail
I tried to search for this on GMANE but was unsuccessful.
I would like to know how some of you guys are whitelisiting this actual
Jim Maul wrote:
>
> This will not work as all it does is assign -100 points to the
> message. This could cause an autolearn=ham on every message, even the
> spam that people post to the list!
Sorry Jim, but that's 100% pure fallacy.. The autolearner explicitly
ignores whitelist and blacklist sco
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_from mail.apache.org
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_from_rcvd mail.apache.org
This will not work as all it does is assign -100 points to the message.
This could caus
Andy Norris wrote:
>
> Sorry about the oversite. I saw this email this morning after a
> not-very-good night's sleep at a motel. Struck close to my heart, as I
> just could not get the whitelist_from_rcvd to work on my box. Very
> frustrating, and a lot of time spent
If you can't get whitelist_fr
Jim Maul wrote:
> While the above works great for people using procmail, does anyone have
> a solution that works without procmail?
"whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] apache.org" worked when I used static
whitelists.
I had a bunch of similar entries for various mailing lists in a big
whit
Sorry about the oversite. I saw this email this morning after a
not-very-good night's sleep at a motel. Struck close to my heart, as I just
could not get the whitelist_from_rcvd to work on my box. Very frustrating,
and a lot of time spent. I finally resorted to the MailScanner way. But I'm
tune
Robert Markin wrote:
Hey everybody,
RH9
SA 3.0.0 (invoked by procmail spamc/spamd)
Sendmail 8
Procmail
I tried to search for this on GMANE but was unsuccessful.
I would like to know how some of you guys are whitelisiting this
actual mailing list. I have the following in my local.cf, but I still
Andy
Robert uses procmail and spamd/spamc so your MailScanner setup (and
mine!) won't work.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Andy Norris wrote:
Hi Robert,
I put this in the (on my machine)
/etc/MailScanner/rules/spam.whitelist.rules:
From:
Hi Robert,
I put this in the (on my machine) /etc/MailScanner/rules/spam.whitelist.rules:
From: jiscmail.ac.uk yes # MailScanner mailing list
From: spamassassin.apache.org yes # SpamAssassin mailing list
Those are tabs, and not spaces.
I tried a bunch of other things... but thi
I'll mention this again since i have yet to come up with a solution.
While the above works great for people using procmail, does anyone have
a solution that works without procmail? Im stuck passing all list
traffic through SA because of this. Just this morning someone on this
list posted a sp
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:20:32AM -0800, Robert Markin wrote:
Hey everybody,
RH9
SA 3.0.0 (invoked by procmail spamc/spamd)
Sendmail 8
Procmail
I tried to search for this on GMANE but was unsuccessful.
I would like to know how some of you guys are whitelisiting this actual
m
Bob McClure Jr wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:20:32AM -0800, Robert Markin wrote:
Hey everybody,
RH9
SA 3.0.0 (invoked by procmail spamc/spamd)
Sendmail 8
Procmail
I tried to search for this on GMANE but was unsuccessful.
I would like to know how some of you guys are whitelis
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 07:20:32AM -0800, Robert Markin wrote:
> Hey everybody,
>
> RH9
> SA 3.0.0 (invoked by procmail spamc/spamd)
> Sendmail 8
> Procmail
>
> I tried to search for this on GMANE but was unsuccessful.
>
> I would like to know how some of you guys are whitelisiting this actual
Hey everybody,
RH9
SA 3.0.0 (invoked by procmail spamc/spamd)
Sendmail 8
Procmail
I tried to search for this on GMANE but was unsuccessful.
I would like to know how some of you guys are whitelisiting this actual
mailing list. I have the following in my local.cf, but I still get
quite a few email
31 matches
Mail list logo
