Johnson, Robert F wrote:
Hi,
I have been having a high occurrence of Japanese false positives since
upgrading from Spam Assassin 2.64 on RedHat 7.3 with MimeDefang 2.31 to
Spam Assassin 3.01 on RedHat Workstation 3.0 installed site wide via
MimeDefang 2.44. I am wondering if this is due to the
-Original Message-
From: alan premselaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 5:55 PM
To: Johnson, Robert F
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Japanese False Postives with Spam Assassin 3.01 and RH WS
3.0
Johnson, Robert F wrote:
Hi,
I have been
Johnson, Robert F [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on spt checking of a couple of dozen examples, I didn't see any
significant pattern of out of the box rules being involved, mostly SARE
or WIKI rules. The most heavily implicated were the following:
(MANGLED and SARE_SUB_CASH_CHAR were
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Johnson, Robert F [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on spt checking of a couple of dozen examples, I didn't see any
significant pattern of out of the box rules being involved, mostly SARE
or WIKI rules. The most heavily implicated were the following:
(MANGLED and
Hello Robert,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 9:25:52 PM, Daniel wrote:
DQ The problem doesn't sound like it's SpamAssassin despite the subject
DQ line of this email, rather it's third-party rulesets.
I agree.
DQ Johnson, Robert F [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on spt checking of a couple of
-Original Message-
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 9:56 AM
To: Johnson, Robert F; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re[2]: Japanese False Postives with Spam Assassin 3.01 and RH
WS
3.0
Hello Robert,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 9:25
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, December 1, 2004, 10:29:12 AM, you wrote:
JRF Could the SARE team provide a guideline regarding the best SARE
JRF and WIKI rules sets to work in an environment that supports the
JRF following languages?
Unfortunately, the SARE team is heavily North American, and as such
