Aaron Boyles wrote on Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:39:07 -0500:
This sounds along the lines of what I'm looking for. Is there an RFC on
this protocol anywhere, and a list of some free servers hosting the
information?
In addition to all technical that has been said in this thread and as I see
from
Hi Aaron,
At 13:14 21-12-2005, Aaron Boyles wrote:
understanding is that I should shell out to nslookup
70.221.33.80.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and nab the response. However, when I
attempt this, I always get the same thing in response: Can't find server
name for address 10.0.0.1 which is our
Aaron Boyles wrote:
A number of people have mentioned that... But what is it? It's not a
command my PC recognizes.
From: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nslookup is broken. :-) Use dig instead.
Dig is a very nice dns lookup program that is fairly standard now on
Linux. Windows still does
: RE: Public Blacklists?
A number of people have mentioned that... But what is it? It's not a
command my PC recognizes.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 1:09 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Public Blacklists?
Hi Aaron
22, 2005 1:24 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Public Blacklists?
Aaron Boyles wrote:
A number of people have mentioned that... But what is it? It's not a
command my PC recognizes.
From: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
nslookup is broken. :-) Use dig instead.
Dig is a very nice dns
Hi Aaron,
At 10:14 22-12-2005, Aaron Boyles wrote:
A number of people have mentioned that... But what is it? It's not a
command my PC recognizes.
It's not part of Windows. It comes with BIND. You can download a
Win32 version at ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind/contrib/ntbind-9.3.2/BIND9.3.2.zip
, 2005 12:01 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Public Blacklists?
Hrm. I tried it, but it crapped out. :/ I used our DCs (2K3 servers)
which are our DNS servers in the .conf file, but still no dice. It
times out saying no servers could be reached.
Any ideas?
-Original Message-
From
To: Aaron Boyles; SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Public Blacklists?
IPs or DNS names?
It wants Ips in the resolve.conf.
(the version that comes with BIND is tested and works on Windows).
Earlier versions crapped out on Windows with various messages.
Steven
-Original Message-
From: Aaron
:12 PM
To: Aaron Boyles; SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Public Blacklists?
IPs or DNS names?
It wants Ips in the resolve.conf.
(the version that comes with BIND is tested and works on Windows).
Earlier versions crapped out on Windows with various messages.
Steven
-Original Message-
From
Hi Aaron,
At 11:24 22-12-2005, Aaron Boyles wrote:
I assumed that typing: dig www.yahoo.com
At the command prompt should have SOMETHING result. Instead, I get the time
out.
dig @10.0.0.1 www.yahoo.com where 10.0.0.1 is the IP address of your
name server.
Regards,
-sm
with any
app using it? And what's the air-speed velocity of a laden swallow?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:05 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Public Blacklists?
Hi Aaron,
At 11:24 22-12-2005, Aaron Boyles wrote:
I
: RE: Public Blacklists?
:o That seems to have worked! So the next question is, how would the
RBL lookup work? And why do they have us put the nameservers in the
.conf file if we're going to reference them in the dig command? And how
many of these files that came with the dig.exe are actually
Aaron Boyles wrote:
:o That seems to have worked! So the next question is, how would the RBL
lookup work? And why do they have us put the nameservers in the .conf file
if we're going to reference them in the dig command? And how many of these
files that came with the dig.exe are actually
Not to me, unfortunately... I'm just a contractor... :D
-Original Message-
From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 3:33 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Public Blacklists?
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Boyles [mailto:[EMAIL
Well... I don't know that!
Ahh..!
-Original Message-
From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 4:01 PM
To: Aaron Boyles
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: [Heading into OT land] Re: Public Blacklists?
Aaron Boyles wrote:
:o That seems
Ah, excellent! Thanks for all your help!
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: SM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 4:53 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: Public Blacklists?
Hi Aaron,
At 12:10 22-12-2005, Aaron Boyles wrote:
:o That seems to have worked! So
Aaron Boyles wrote:
On a side note, is anyone very familiar with any protocols involving
public blacklists? I'm looking for the ability to simply toss an IP at
a site somewhere, and get a simple 'yes/no' response as to whether or
not it's a spam IP?
All the common blacklists use DNS lookups,
...
On a side note, is anyone very familiar with any protocols involving public
blacklists? I'm looking for the ability to simply toss an IP at a site
somewhere, and get a simple 'yes/no' response as to whether or not it's a
spam IP?
-Aaron Boyles
ITC Applications Programmer
...
Far
21, 2005 3:26 PM
To: Aaron Boyles
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Public Blacklists?
Aaron Boyles wrote:
On a side note, is anyone very familiar with any protocols involving
public blacklists? I'm looking for the ability to simply toss an IP
at a site somewhere, and get a simple 'yes
Aaron Boyles wrote:
This sounds along the lines of what I'm looking for. Is there an RFC on
this protocol anywhere, and a list of some free servers hosting the
information?
As for an RFC, none that I know of. The best you might get would be the sendmail
docs, because it is sendmail's
Programmer
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:02 PM
To: Aaron Boyles
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Public Blacklists?
Aaron Boyles wrote:
This sounds along the lines of what I'm looking for. Is there an RFC
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Public Blacklists?
Aaron Boyles wrote:
On a side note, is anyone very familiar with any protocols involving
public blacklists? I'm looking for the ability to simply toss an IP
at a site somewhere, and get a simple 'yes/no' response as to whether
Aaron Boyles wrote:
Thus, if I wanted to check IP 80.22.221.70, my
understanding is that I should shell out to nslookup
70.221.33.80.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org and nab the response.
Yes, you should be able to, although on many systems the preferred commands are
host and dig.
However, when I
there's another option?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:34 PM
To: Aaron Boyles
Cc: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Public Blacklists?
Aaron Boyles wrote:
Thus, if I wanted to check IP 80.22.221.70, my
understanding
Aaron Boyles wrote:
Actually, no, I can't. I get that message with Yahoo as well. I vaguely
remember running into this issue before, and it having something to do with
using Windows 2K3 server behind NAT. As I recall at the time, it was
decided that the 'solution' was far more work than it
Aaron Boyles wrote:
Actually, no, I can't. I get that message with Yahoo as well. I vaguely
remember running into this issue before, and it having something to do
with
using Windows 2K3 server behind NAT. As I recall at the time, it was
decided that the 'solution' was far more work than it
My guess would be yes, though I don't have any DNS servers handy to do an
external check on.
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Mike Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:59 PM
To: SpamAssassin
Subject: Re: Public Blacklists?
Aaron Boyles wrote
From: Aaron Boyles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
attempt this, I always get the same thing in response: Can't find server
name for address 10.0.0.1 which is our gateway.
It's a bug in nslookup. nslookup expects the DNS server to be authoritive
for its own reverse address and blows up if
28 matches
Mail list logo
