Am 29.08.2015 um 12:40 schrieb websiterepairguy.:
I'm trying to get the following line to work in my user_prefs file:
whitelist_from_rcvd*bankofamerica.com
http://bankofamerica.com/bankofamerica.com http://bankofamerica.com/
Of course, this works:
whitelist_from*bankofamerica.com
Am 29.08.2015 um 13:46 schrieb RW:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:45:27 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.08.2015 um 12:40 schrieb websiterepairguy.:
I'm trying to get the following line to work in my user_prefs file:
whitelist_from_rcvd*bankofamerica.com
http://bankofamerica.com/bankofamerica.com
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 13:57:02 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.08.2015 um 13:46 schrieb RW:
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:45:27 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
helo=ealerts.bankofamerica.com by=box458.bluehost.com
bankofamerica.com != bluehost.com
The by=box458.bluehost.com is not relevant,
On Sat, 29 Aug 2015 12:45:27 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.08.2015 um 12:40 schrieb websiterepairguy.:
I'm trying to get the following line to work in my user_prefs file:
whitelist_from_rcvd*bankofamerica.com
http://bankofamerica.com/bankofamerica.com
http://bankofamerica.com/
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
Header of test message, massaged for privacy, is here:
http://pastebin.com/EV6g15aN
I have this in user_prefs:
trusted_networks 198.1.2.3/32
[...lots snipped...]
whitelist_from_rcvd *@wetransfer.com *.wetransfer.com
Why is the whitelist not
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:37:29 +0100,
Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
Ian trusted_networks 198.1.2.3/32
Ian [...lots snipped...]
Ian whitelist_from_rcvd *@wetransfer.com *.wetransfer.com
Mark It seems the:
Mark Received: (from itz@localhost)
Mark by myalias.trusted.mx
Am 27.02.2015 um 22:11 schrieb Ian Zimmerman:
Header of test message, massaged for privacy, is here:
http://pastebin.com/EV6g15aN
I have this in user_prefs:
trusted_networks 198.1.2.3/32
[...lots snipped...]
whitelist_from_rcvd *@wetransfer.com *.wetransfer.com
Why is the whitelist
Am 28.02.2015 um 16:53 schrieb Ian Zimmerman:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:37:29 +0100,
Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
Ian trusted_networks 198.1.2.3/32
Ian [...lots snipped...]
Ian whitelist_from_rcvd *@wetransfer.com *.wetransfer.com
Mark It seems the:
Mark Received: (from
http://pastebin.com/EV6g15aN
I have this in user_prefs:
trusted_networks 198.1.2.3/32
[...lots snipped...]
whitelist_from_rcvd *@wetransfer.com *.wetransfer.com
Why is the whitelist not firing?
It seems the:
Received: (from itz@localhost)
by myalias.trusted.mx
Ian Zimmerman skrev den 2015-02-28 16:53:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 13:37:29 +0100,
Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
Ian trusted_networks 198.1.2.3/32
Ian [...lots snipped...]
Ian whitelist_from_rcvd *@wetransfer.com *.wetransfer.com
Mark It seems the:
Mark Received: (from
SM wrote:
At 22:02 08-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
I have the following rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] dtdm.tomsk.ru
Please help me figure out why the rule does not work. Below is a sample
message where I think the rule should work but actually does not.
[snip]
Victor Sudakov wrote:
I have the following rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] dtdm.tomsk.ru
Please help me figure out why the rule does not work. Below is a sample
message where I think the rule should work but actually does not.
[snip]
Received: from
SM wrote:
At 22:02 08-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
I have the following rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] dtdm.tomsk.ru
Please help me figure out why the rule does not work. Below is a sample
message where I think the rule should work but actually does not.
Hi Victor,
At 00:59 09-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
No, the host shows up as gw.dtdm.tomsk.ru which matches dtdm.tomsk.ru.
You can see how the Received headers in the message are parsed by
saving the entire message to a file and running it through SpamAssassin:
spamassassin -t -D
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
SM wrote:
At 22:02 08-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
I have the following rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] dtdm.tomsk.ru
[snip..]
Received: from mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]
by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru with
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
SM wrote:
At 22:02 08-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
I have the following rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] dtdm.tomsk.ru
Please help me figure out why the rule does not work. Below is a sample
message where I think the rule
SM wrote:
No, the host shows up as gw.dtdm.tomsk.ru which matches dtdm.tomsk.ru.
You can see how the Received headers in the message are parsed by
saving the entire message to a file and running it through SpamAssassin:
spamassassin -t -D filename
The output will show whether the host
Dave Funk wrote:
I have the following rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] dtdm.tomsk.ru
[snip..]
Received: from mail.sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.5]
by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Tue, 08 Apr
Hi Victor,
At 19:38 09-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Yes, the output is here
Sorry, I missed that.
Which lines show whether the host matches dtdm.tomsk.ru and why?
From your output:
dbg: received-header: found fetchmail marker outside trusted area, ignored
The Received header inserted
Hi Victor,
At 19:54 09-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
OK, this was a poor example. Here is a better one. Let's start anew :)
The rule is
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mncs.tomsk.ru
The relay is mncs.tomsk.ru, as you see, whose forward and reverse DNS
mapping is correct.
The forward
Victor Sudakov wrote:
OK, this was a poor example. Here is a better one. Let's start anew :)
The rule is
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mncs.tomsk.ru
The relay is mncs.tomsk.ru, as you see, whose forward and reverse DNS
mapping is correct.
Why does the rule not work with the
SM wrote:
[dd]
dbg: received-header: found fetchmail marker outside trusted area, ignored
dbg: received-header: parsed as [ ip=213.183.100.11 rdns=
helo=gw.dtdm.tomsk.ru by=relay2.tomsk.ru ident= envfrom= intl=0
id=9838562 auth= msa=0 ]
dbg: received-header: relay 213.183.100.11
SM wrote:
OK, this was a poor example. Here is a better one. Let's start anew :)
The rule is
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mncs.tomsk.ru
The relay is mncs.tomsk.ru, as you see, whose forward and reverse DNS
mapping is correct.
The forward and reverse DNS mapping for that host
Hi Victor,
At 22:02 08-04-2008, Victor Sudakov wrote:
I have the following rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] dtdm.tomsk.ru
Please help me figure out why the rule does not work. Below is a sample
message where I think the rule should work but actually does not.
[snip]
Loren Wilton wrote:
d) Most of you guys are going to say Get a decent MTA. Some of you
might
Didn't you say you were using qmail? Or am I
misremembering/misinterpreting? If you are using qmail for MTA, I'm
reasonably sure I recall discussion of patches to qmail to make it Do
The Right
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wachovia.com
whitelist_from_rcvd *wachovia.com wachovia.com
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 7:21 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelist_from_rcvd not working
It occurs
[9060] dbg: Botnet: starting
[9060] dbg: Botnet: no trusted relays
[9060] dbg: Botnet: get_relay didn't find RDNS
[9060] dbg: Botnet: IP is '169.200.184.174'
[9060] dbg: Botnet: RDNS is 'sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com'
[9060] dbg: Botnet: HELO is 'sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com'
[9060] dbg:
to have
run my email with my user_prefs, but didn't provide the -D output.
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:47 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelist_from_rcvd not working
[9060] dbg: Botnet: starting
Dan Barker wrote:
[9060] dbg: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Trusted:
There are no trusted relays.
[9060] dbg: metadata: X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted: [ ip=169.200.184.174 rdns=
helo=sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com by=mail.visioncomm.net ident= envfrom=
intl=0 id=
A1253F3B0064 auth= msa=0 ] [
-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 12:39 PM
To: Dan Barker
Subject: Re: Whitelist_from_rcvd not working
Dan Barker wrote:
I don't know why you'd think there is no rDNS.
dig -x 169.200.184.174
Says: sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com.
Is there some place
I had some old, 3.1.7 files saved for a VBounce question last summer. They
show:
Header:
Received: from vsmtp107.tin.it [212.216.176.208] by mail.visioncomm.net with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A08C12EF0080; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:14:20 -0400
...
Debug lines:
...
[2456] dbg: generic: SpamAssassin
I had some old, 3.1.7 files saved for a VBounce question last summer. They
show:
Header:
Received: from vsmtp107.tin.it [212.216.176.208] by mail.visioncomm.net
with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A08C12EF0080; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 15:14:20 -0400
Debug lines:
...
[2456] dbg: received-header: parsed as
Eureka! Problem solved/hacked/understood/whatever.
a) My MTA is crap, and puts the HELO name and IP in the received header, but
no rDNS.
a1) This P.O.S. MTA has an option to Check rDNS. It will check for you,
and then return SUCCESS or FAILURE on the existence of a PTR or A record
(does not look
From: Loren Wilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 2008, January 05 10:37
I had some old, 3.1.7 files saved for a VBounce question last summer.
They
show:
Header:
Received: from vsmtp107.tin.it [212.216.176.208] by mail.visioncomm.net
with
ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.15) id A08C12EF0080; Wed, 15
d) Most of you guys are going to say Get a decent MTA. Some of you might
Didn't you say you were using qmail? Or am I
misremembering/misinterpreting? If you are using qmail for MTA, I'm
reasonably sure I recall discussion of patches to qmail to make it Do The
Right Thing that are available
]
Dan
-Original Message-
From: McDonald, Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 9:22 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelist_from_rcvd not working
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:12 -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
My whitelist_from_rcvd tags don't hit. I
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:12 -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
My whitelist_from_rcvd tags don't hit. I believe this has been happening
since my upgrade from 3.1.7 to 3.2.3.
I don't see anything interesting in -D, but I can get it to show an error
if I mis-spell it whitelist_fxxxrom_rcvd, so I know
: Whitelist_from_rcvd not working
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:50 -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
Dan McDonald points out that gadental.org has a mismatched rDNS and
posits that is the reason whitelist_from_rcvd fails.
So, here is a different email with the same symptom, but with matched
rDNS.
[EMAIL
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 09:50 -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
Dan McDonald points out that gadental.org has a mismatched rDNS and posits
that is the reason whitelist_from_rcvd fails.
So, here is a different email with the same symptom, but with matched rDNS.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dig -x
Dan Barker wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com
gives the same result (ie, nothing in debug nor report).
I think that should work. Try 'spamassassin --lint' to make sure that
there isn't a syntax error in the file somewhere that is preventing
the
Barker
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelist_from_rcvd not working
Dan Barker wrote:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sls-sn-smtp-pmail3.wachovia.com
gives the same result (ie, nothing in debug nor report).
I think that should work. Try 'spamassassin --lint' to make
Dan Barker wrote:
Debug http://www.visioncomm.net/temp/080104Debug3.txt.
What is the name of the file that you have your configuration in? Do
you see it in the debug output? Is this it?
[8840] dbg: config: using C:\Documents and
Settings\dbarker/.spamassassin/user_prefs for user prefs file
Dan Barker wrote:
My whitelist_from_rcvd tags don't hit. I believe this has been happening
since my upgrade from 3.1.7 to 3.2.3.
snip
Just in case there is something [else] I've done silly, my local.cf is at
http://www.visioncomm.net/temp/080104Local.txt):
Here's what may be a thoroughly
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Whitelist_from_rcvd not working
Dan Barker wrote:
My whitelist_from_rcvd tags don't hit. I believe this has been
happening since my upgrade from 3.1.7 to 3.2.3.
snip
Just in case there is something [else] I've done silly, my local.cf is
at
http
-Original Message-
From: Dan Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 5:48 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Whitelist_from_rcvd not working
It's NATted. I'll add the public versions and see. (Assuming you mean
internal_networks - If you mean local_networks
[9420] dbg: check: is spam? score=-5.141 required=5 [9420] dbg: check:
tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED
How the heck did you get 5+ points with those tests hitting???
Content analysis details: (-0.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
From my understanding the whitelist entry should contain and address then the
domain
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] cecinfo.org
-Original Message-
From: Robert Fitzpatrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 9:13 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject:
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
Can someone point out what I am doing wrong hereI have this in my
local.cf file:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail*.magnetmail.net
But messages are getting blocked that I believe should match this?
What about the below suggests this mail is [EMAIL
James Long wrote:
James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
^^
Your IP for the ns.museum.rain.com comes back as
James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
^^
Your IP for the ns.museum.rain.com comes back as 65.75.198.49, are you
James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
^^
Your IP for the ns.museum.rain.com comes back as
On 3/12/2006 2:21 PM, James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns.umpquanet.com
...
yet messages that I had hoped would match that
On 3/12/2006 2:21 PM, James Long wrote:
In my SpamAssassin-3.1.0 (p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0_6) local.cf, I
use:
...
trusted_networks 127.0.0.0/8 65.75.198.48/28 63.105.30.37/32
...
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] ns.umpquanet.com
...
yet messages that I had
On 3/12/2006 8:13 PM, James Long wrote:
Mail sent via SMTP should have all of it's headers parsed correctly and
your whitelist_from_rcvd should work.
Yet, it doesn't. One of the nightly server log messages has been
getting rejected because SA thinks it is spam, and doesn't see the
54 matches
Mail list logo
