-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
yossim wrote:
> Hi folks, Hi can i learn miss identified junk mail that is store on
> exchange or at the otulook clients? Can i simply copy those mails to a
> folder on my Linux server and run sa-learn with the required parameters?
> Kindly regards, Yo
He's on a machine I administer. I have a "thing" about autolearn.
I don't do it. So this is not a problem for Loren. (It's too big
a pain to repair a self-mis-trained bayes database. So the neat
selectively trained bayes databases we have work quite nicely as
a result.) I cannot see the long term u
Jim Maul wrote:
It fixes my problem of list messages being autolearned incorrectly,
but i'd rather not scan them at all. Someone made a suggestion (and
patch) on the qmail scanner mailing list where you can optionally turn
SA scanning off using tcp.smtp from certain ip's. I may use this t
Very nice solution for my needs.
Thank you !
maurizio
Il giorno mar, 24-05-2005 alle 13:08 -0400, Jim Maul ha scritto:
> mizzio wrote:
> > Hello guys,
> > sorry to bother you again: I didn't find a way to exclude this mailing
> > list from SA scanning in my setup.
> > I'm using qmail + qmail-scan
Until i can come up with a way to not scan some emails selectively
using qmail-scanner (without procmail) i have setteled on using the
following statements in my local.cf
bayes_ignore_to users@spamassassin.apache.org
whitelist_to users@spamassassin.apache.org
This causes (most) list messages
mizzio wrote:
Hello guys,
sorry to bother you again: I didn't find a way to exclude this mailing
list from SA scanning in my setup.
I'm using qmail + qmail-scanner + spamassassin on my mailserver, the
only posts I found are about excluding the scanning with procmail (which
I'm not using).
I did
Loren,
it works:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-56.2 required=4.5
X-Spam-Report: SA TESTS -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST_SA SA List 2.4 BAYES_50
BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4439]
One more question: I understand that in this way the mail are never
marked at spam, but they are auto
> I did not find a way of doing this through qmail-scanner: is there a way
> of doing this directly with spamassassin ?
Possibly someone else knows of a way with qmail-scanner. If not, you can't
"exclude" it with SA, but you *can* whitelist the list with SA. That will
probably be sufficient.
Th
Hello guys,
sorry to bother you again: I didn't find a way to exclude this mailing
list from SA scanning in my setup.
I'm using qmail + qmail-scanner + spamassassin on my mailserver, the
only posts I found are about excluding the scanning with procmail (which
I'm not using).
I did not find a way o
Thank very much Loren.
regards,
mizzio
Il giorno lun, 23-05-2005 alle 04:51 -0700, Loren Wilton ha scritto:
> > - I get some messages marked as SPAM coming form this mailing list,
> > since the body contains URLs and text from real spam messages: do I have
> > to feed them in my DB as ham or this
> - I get some messages marked as SPAM coming form this mailing list,
> since the body contains URLs and text from real spam messages: do I have
> to feed them in my DB as ham or this can cause some kind of bayes
> poisoning ?
The best thing is to avoid having the mail from this list go through SA
11 matches
Mail list logo