Occasionally I'd like to do something like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] /^smtp[0-9]+\.orange\.fr$/
The situation is that domain.fr is relaying mail through their provider,
which has a number of smtp servers named smtpNN.orange.fr. If I were
to stick to the current
Per Jessen wrote:
Occasionally I'd like to do something like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] /^smtp[0-9]+\.orange\.fr$/
The situation is that domain.fr is relaying mail through their provider,
which has a number of smtp servers named smtpNN.orange.fr. If I were
to stick to the
Per Jessen wrote:
Occasionally I'd like to do something like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] /^smtp[0-9]+\.orange\.fr$/
One problem.. That involves a regex, but whitelist_from is a regular
user config option.
In general, regular expressions are intentionally not used in
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:38:22PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:22:08PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, I saw that in the code - still, having a
whitelist_from_rcvdregex
would be very useful, people relay via their providers quite a lot.
I guess
Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:38:22PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:22:08PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, I saw that in the code - still, having a
whitelist_from_rcvdregex
would be very useful, people relay via their providers quite a lot.
Henrik K wrote:
Then instead of asking for a lacking addition to a poor whitelisting
method (in this case), we should enhance whitelist_from_rcvd to
process received paths:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2.3.4 2.3.4.5
Should this be read to mean whitelist from foobar if it came
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:07:59PM +0100, mouss wrote:
Then instead of asking for a lacking addition to a poor whitelisting method
(in this case), we should enhance whitelist_from_rcvd to process received
paths:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2.3.4 2.3.4.5
why? I wouldn't put 30
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:09:29PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Henrik K wrote:
Then instead of asking for a lacking addition to a poor whitelisting
method (in this case), we should enhance whitelist_from_rcvd to
process received paths:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2.3.4
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:20:17PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:09:29PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I'm not sure I like the ideas of whitelisting based on IP-addresses,
it's too inflexible. Why would you not use hostnames?
Hmm.. ok I think you both (mouss) are
Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:22:08PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Yes, I saw that in the code - still, having a
whitelist_from_rcvdregex
would be very useful, people relay via their providers quite a lot.
I guess I'll have to write something up.
If the originator is static IP,
Per Jessen wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Occasionally I'd like to do something like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] /^smtp[0-9]+\.orange\.fr$/
One problem.. That involves a regex, but whitelist_from is a regular
user config option.
In general, regular
Henrik K wrote:
why link that to trusted_networks?
Obviously the whole IP path must be trusted (excluding the last one). You
can use hostnames as well. But then you have to have trust path right, to
trust later hostnames.
maybe I misunderstood your could even work
And perhaps it
Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:20:17PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:09:29PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
I'm not sure I like the ideas of whitelisting based on IP-addresses,
it's too inflexible. Why would you not use hostnames?
Hmm.. ok I think you both (mouss)
Matt Kettler wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Occasionally I'd like to do something like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] /^smtp[0-9]+\.orange\.fr$/
One problem.. That involves a regex, but whitelist_from is a regular
user config option.
In general, regular expressions are
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 04:45:57PM +0100, mouss wrote:
With hostnames there is a bigger change of failure (by just using a domain
instead of exact hostname, letting f.e. dialup users from the domain forge
the path).
not sure I understand. people can't easily forge their rdns (in the
What
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:22:08PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
Matt Kettler wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Occasionally I'd like to do something like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] /^smtp[0-9]+\.orange\.fr$/
One problem.. That involves a regex, but whitelist_from is a
16 matches
Mail list logo
