Henrik K wrote: > Then instead of asking for a lacking addition to a poor whitelisting > method (in this case), we should enhance whitelist_from_rcvd to > process received paths: > > whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2.3.4 2.3.4.5 >
Should this be read to mean "whitelist from foobar if it came via 1.2.3.4 AND 2.3.4.5"? That's an interesting option, but I can't see much immediate use. Maybe when I've thought about it for a bit. > Perhaps it could even work with hostnames as long as they stay inside > trusted_networks. I'm not sure I like the ideas of whitelisting based on IP-addresses, it's too inflexible. Why would you not use hostnames? > And perhaps it could support basic wildcards instead of regexps. I appreciate Matts explanation about whitelist_from_rcvd being a regular user option, so maybe the right way would be a "whitelist_from_rcvdregex" ? /Per Jessen, Zürich
