On 2021-04-08 18:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Therefore it should work in 3.4.5
thanks. I wait until debian guys will push 3.4.5 to backports.
will be 3.4.6, if debian is awake :-)
Am 2021-04-08 17:46, schrieb Bill Cole:
On 8 Apr 2021, at 6:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
and there is no undef_whitelist_auth, and the unwhitelist_auth
does NOT work.
It does work in 3.4.5, although if you're not there yet I'd advise
waiting for 3.4.6.
See https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssa
Am 2021-04-08 17:46, schrieb Bill Cole:
On 8 Apr 2021, at 6:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
and there is no undef_whitelist_auth, and the unwhitelist_auth does
NOT work.
It does work in 3.4.5, although if you're not there yet I'd advise
waiting for 3.4.6.
See https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssa
Am 2021-04-08 17:26, schrieb Bill Cole:
On 8 Apr 2021, at 8:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google
domains
and ad
On 8 Apr 2021, at 6:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
and there is no undef_whitelist_auth, and the unwhitelist_auth does
NOT work.
It does work in 3.4.5, although if you're not there yet I'd advise
waiting for 3.4.6.
See https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7809
--
Bill Col
On 8 Apr 2021, at 8:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
>
> It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google domains
> and addresses for sendin
>On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
>>
>> It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google domains
>> and addresses for sending spam from.
On 04.04.21 14:19, RW wrote:
>If google have been foolis
On 04 Apr 2021, at 05:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
On 04.04.21 06:35, @lbutlr wrote:
The way that SA solves problems is by changing score values.
The entire foundation of SA is "playing with scores".
I disagree. The main work
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I see they are evolving now, using google redirects to google links,
further
hiding.
https://www.google.com/url?q=https://sites.google.com/
I've just created local rules to give a few points to several such
constructs ranging from a low-scoring hit on just hav
An update to this:
On 04.04.21 12:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have received spam from:
From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)"
it wasn't catches because of:
60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com
Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove
*@go
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 16:47:18 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> >> >change score to 7.5
> >> >change score to -3.5
>
> >On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with sco
On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>change score to 7.5
>change score to -3.5
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google domains
and addresses for
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> >change score to 7.5
> >change score to -3.5
>
> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
>
> It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google domains
> an
On 04 Apr 2021, at 05:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> change score to 7.5
>> change score to -3.5
>
> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
The way that SA solves problems is by changing score values.
The entire foundation of
On 2021-04-04 13:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
change score to 7.5
change score to -3.5
I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
first rule hits is local rule with imho to low score for problems on
spamassassin rules :-)
meta
On 2021-04-04 12:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have received spam from:
From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)"
it wasn't catches because of:
60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com
Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove
*@google.com from de
On 2021-04-04 12:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Hello,
I have received spam from:
From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)"
it wasn't catches because of:
60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com
Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove
*@google.com
Hello,
I have received spam from:
From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)"
it wasn't catches because of:
60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com
Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove
*@google.com from def_whitelist_* ?
the full header:
X-Spam-Repo
18 matches
Mail list logo